NCT05153473

Brief Summary

Total hip arthroplasty is the preferred treatment for hip disease (primary or secondary osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, for example) and femoral neck fractures. Revision risk factors reported when considering the main surgical approaches. Studied from the Dutch arthroplasty registry found a revision rate in hemiarthroplasty (HA) of 1.6% at 1 year and 2.5% at 5 years postoperatively. For total hip replacement (THA), the rate was 2.4% at 1 and 4.3% at 5 years postoperatively. Analyze shows that the risk factors for hemiarthroplasty were male sex, age under 80 (regardless of gender), posterolateral approach and uncemented fixation. The risk factors for HAT were exactly the same, but they found that smoking also played a role. It should be noted that age as a risk factor for revision is not a risk during the first year after the fracture, but becomes one in the years that follow. In order to maintain compliance with the directive on medical devices (93/42 / EEC \[M5\]) and the future regulation (EU) (2017/745) relating to medical devices, SERF has set up post-market clinical follow-ups ( PMCF). This PMCF study aims to improve knowledge related to the performance, safety and benefit / risk ratio of the Sagitta EVL-R stem and to monitor patient care strategy through this clinical evaluation. Significant clinical results as well as safety must be confirmed with this patient cohort. It is important to note that this cohort reflects the specific care strategy of the University Hospital of Poitiers. Therefore, the strategy could be different between hospitals and countries.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2019

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 24, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 26, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 8, 2019

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 29, 2021

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 10, 2021

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 29, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 29, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 days

First QC Date

November 29, 2021

Results QC Date

September 21, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 22, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Survival Rate of Stems

    at 5 years follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Patient Satisfaction

    at 5 years follow-up

  • Functional Improvement

    at 5 years follow-up

  • Pain Release

    at 5 years follow-up

Interventions

Hip revision surgery is performed to repair an artificial hip joint (prosthesis) that has been damaged over time due to an infection, or due to normal wear and tear of the prosthetic hip. Revision surgery helps to correct the problem so the hip can function normally again.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Recruitment 120 adults patients representing 124 hips operated between 2011 and 2014.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients over 18 years old.
  • Patients that were treated with the sagitta EVL-R stem for an indication of arthroplasty and according to the Instruction For Use (IFU).
  • Primary or secondary arthrosis,
  • Advanced joint destruction resulting from rheumatoid arthritis or traumatic arthritis,
  • A fracture or an avascular necrosis,
  • Following a previous surgical operation, on condition that the new device does not interfere with the material in place.
  • indicated in the case of primary or secondary arthrosis, displaced sub-capital or transcervical fracture as well as stages I and IIB bone loss according to the PAPROWSKI classification.
  • The SAGITTA EVOLUTION for REVISION implant is recommended for indications according to the bone loss classifications of SOFCOT stages I to VI, PAPROSKY types I to VI and the AAOS types Ia to Ic.
  • Dysplasia

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient presenting a contraindication indicated in the IFU.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU de Poitiers

Poitiers, 86000, France

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Delaunay C, Epinette JA, Dawson J, Murray D, Jolles BM. Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 HIP score to the French speaking population. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Apr;95(2):89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Apr 3.

    PMID: 19345630BACKGROUND
  • Girard J, Roche O, Wavreille G, Canovas F, Le Beguec P. Stem subsidence after total hip revision: 183 cases at 5.9 years follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Apr;97(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.10.006. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

    PMID: 21435964BACKGROUND
  • Maradit Kremers H, Larson DR, Crowson CS, Kremers WK, Washington RE, Steiner CA, Jiranek WA, Berry DJ. Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 2;97(17):1386-97. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01141.

    PMID: 26333733BACKGROUND
  • Moerman S, Mathijssen NMC, Tuinebreijer WE, Vochteloo AJH, Nelissen RGHH. Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in 30,830 patients with hip fractures: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register on revision and risk factors for revision. Acta Orthop. 2018 Oct;89(5):509-514. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1499069. Epub 2018 Aug 6.

    PMID: 30080985BACKGROUND
  • Tangsataporn S, Safir OA, Vincent AD, Abdelbary H, Gross AE, Kuzyk PR. Risk Factors for Subsidence of a Modular Tapered Femoral Stem Used for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jun;30(6):1030-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

    PMID: 25701193BACKGROUND

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Louis Etienne GAYET
Organization
CHU de Poitiers

Study Officials

  • Louis-Etienne GAYET, MD

    Poitiers University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2021

First Posted

December 10, 2021

Study Start

June 24, 2019

Primary Completion

June 26, 2019

Study Completion

November 8, 2019

Last Updated

November 29, 2024

Results First Posted

November 29, 2024

Record last verified: 2022-09

Locations