Assessment of the Safety and the Performance of the SAGITTA EVL R Stems in Hip Arthroplasties
Retro-prospective and Observational Study of 120 Patients for the Assessment of the Safety and the Performance of the SAGITTA EVL R Stems in Hip Arthroplasties
1 other identifier
observational
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Total hip arthroplasty is the preferred treatment for hip disease (primary or secondary osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, for example) and femoral neck fractures. Revision risk factors reported when considering the main surgical approaches. Studied from the Dutch arthroplasty registry found a revision rate in hemiarthroplasty (HA) of 1.6% at 1 year and 2.5% at 5 years postoperatively. For total hip replacement (THA), the rate was 2.4% at 1 and 4.3% at 5 years postoperatively. Analyze shows that the risk factors for hemiarthroplasty were male sex, age under 80 (regardless of gender), posterolateral approach and uncemented fixation. The risk factors for HAT were exactly the same, but they found that smoking also played a role. It should be noted that age as a risk factor for revision is not a risk during the first year after the fracture, but becomes one in the years that follow. In order to maintain compliance with the directive on medical devices (93/42 / EEC \[M5\]) and the future regulation (EU) (2017/745) relating to medical devices, SERF has set up post-market clinical follow-ups ( PMCF). This PMCF study aims to improve knowledge related to the performance, safety and benefit / risk ratio of the Sagitta EVL-R stem and to monitor patient care strategy through this clinical evaluation. Significant clinical results as well as safety must be confirmed with this patient cohort. It is important to note that this cohort reflects the specific care strategy of the University Hospital of Poitiers. Therefore, the strategy could be different between hospitals and countries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 24, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 29, 2024
CompletedNovember 29, 2024
September 1, 2022
2 days
November 29, 2021
September 21, 2022
November 22, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Survival Rate of Stems
at 5 years follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Patient Satisfaction
at 5 years follow-up
Functional Improvement
at 5 years follow-up
Pain Release
at 5 years follow-up
Interventions
Hip revision surgery is performed to repair an artificial hip joint (prosthesis) that has been damaged over time due to an infection, or due to normal wear and tear of the prosthetic hip. Revision surgery helps to correct the problem so the hip can function normally again.
Eligibility Criteria
Recruitment 120 adults patients representing 124 hips operated between 2011 and 2014.
You may qualify if:
- Patients over 18 years old.
- Patients that were treated with the sagitta EVL-R stem for an indication of arthroplasty and according to the Instruction For Use (IFU).
- Primary or secondary arthrosis,
- Advanced joint destruction resulting from rheumatoid arthritis or traumatic arthritis,
- A fracture or an avascular necrosis,
- Following a previous surgical operation, on condition that the new device does not interfere with the material in place.
- indicated in the case of primary or secondary arthrosis, displaced sub-capital or transcervical fracture as well as stages I and IIB bone loss according to the PAPROWSKI classification.
- The SAGITTA EVOLUTION for REVISION implant is recommended for indications according to the bone loss classifications of SOFCOT stages I to VI, PAPROSKY types I to VI and the AAOS types Ia to Ic.
- Dysplasia
You may not qualify if:
- Patient presenting a contraindication indicated in the IFU.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers, 86000, France
Related Publications (5)
Delaunay C, Epinette JA, Dawson J, Murray D, Jolles BM. Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 HIP score to the French speaking population. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Apr;95(2):89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
PMID: 19345630BACKGROUNDGirard J, Roche O, Wavreille G, Canovas F, Le Beguec P. Stem subsidence after total hip revision: 183 cases at 5.9 years follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Apr;97(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.10.006. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
PMID: 21435964BACKGROUNDMaradit Kremers H, Larson DR, Crowson CS, Kremers WK, Washington RE, Steiner CA, Jiranek WA, Berry DJ. Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 2;97(17):1386-97. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01141.
PMID: 26333733BACKGROUNDMoerman S, Mathijssen NMC, Tuinebreijer WE, Vochteloo AJH, Nelissen RGHH. Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in 30,830 patients with hip fractures: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register on revision and risk factors for revision. Acta Orthop. 2018 Oct;89(5):509-514. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1499069. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
PMID: 30080985BACKGROUNDTangsataporn S, Safir OA, Vincent AD, Abdelbary H, Gross AE, Kuzyk PR. Risk Factors for Subsidence of a Modular Tapered Femoral Stem Used for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jun;30(6):1030-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
PMID: 25701193BACKGROUND
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Louis Etienne GAYET
- Organization
- CHU de Poitiers
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Louis-Etienne GAYET, MD
Poitiers University Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2021
First Posted
December 10, 2021
Study Start
June 24, 2019
Primary Completion
June 26, 2019
Study Completion
November 8, 2019
Last Updated
November 29, 2024
Results First Posted
November 29, 2024
Record last verified: 2022-09