NCT05153265|Completed
The CIA Score: a Learner's Tool
Critical, Intervention, Assess: Using the CIA System as a Learning Tool to Assess Bleeding Risk in Regional Anesthesia.
Loading search results
Critical, Intervention, Assess: Using the CIA System as a Learning Tool to Assess Bleeding Risk in Regional Anesthesia.
Sponsor study identifier
observational
69
1 country
1
Study Start
November 23, 2021
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
December 23, 2021
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 23, 2021
Actual (reported)The goal of this project is to use a previously described scoring system - the CIA system - as a teaching tool to help learners assess the bleeding risk of peripheral nerve blocks. We will teach the CIA system to residents, then they will complete a survey in which they apply the system to various peripheral nerve blocks. We hypothesize that the CIA system will allow learners to reach the same consensus about bleeding risk as expert opinions.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
December 23, 2021
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
November 23, 2021
Actual (reported)November 29, 2021
Actual (reported)December 10, 2021
Actual (reported)December 23, 2021
Actual (reported)December 23, 2021
Actual (reported)CIA score by trainees
The bleeding risk of each peripheral nerve block as assessed by trainees, using the CIA scoring system.
2 months
We plan to distribute a survey to the Stanford anesthesiology residents to determine their assessment of the bleeding risk of nerve blocks. The survey will list the most common nerve blocks and ask the resident anesthesiologists at Stanford whether the block is low/intermediate/high risk based on a scoring system of location relative to critical structures, compressibility, and whether bleeding or hematoma would be readily apparent.
We plan to distribute a survey to the Stanford anesthesiology attending physicians to determine their assessment of the bleeding risk of several different nerve blocks. The survey will list the most common nerve blocks and ask Stanford anesthesiologists whether the block is low/intermediate/high risk based on their experience with nerve blocks.
There will be no interventions for study participants. Participants will be asked to complete a survey.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Stanford Regional Anesthesia attending physicians and residents
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Tsui BCH, Kirkham K, Kwofie MK, Tran Q, Wong P, Chin KJ, Sondekoppam RV. Practice advisory on the bleeding risks for peripheral nerve and interfascial plane blockade: evidence review and expert consensus. Can J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;66(11):1356-1384. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01466-w. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
Tsui BCH. A systematic approach to scoring bleeding risk in regional anesthesia procedures. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Sep;49:69-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 15. No abstract available.
69 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
November 29, 2021
First Posted
December 10, 2021
Study Start
November 23, 2021
Actual (reported)Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
December 23, 2021
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 23, 2021
Actual (reported)Last Updated
March 16, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: