NCT05152199

Brief Summary

Rigid cystoscopy is a common procedure to evaluate lower urinary tract symptoms in females. This procedure can be done with or without an instrument called a sheath obturator. Both techniques are used by surgeons and are considered safe, but have never been studied to see if one technique leads to less discomfort with the patient's first void after the procedure. The obturator's use may potentially reduce urethral irritation and bothersome postprocedural symptoms, primarily dysuria. The investigators aim to determine whether there is a difference in dysuria outcomes postoperatively when cystoscopy is performed with or without an obturator.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
68

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 23, 2021

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2021

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 22, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 29, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 29, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 7, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

November 23, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 29, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Rigid CystoscopyObturator SheathUrogynecology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post-Procedure Dysuria

    The participant will be asked to void within 10 minutes of the completed procedure. The participant will then complete a Visual Analog Numeric Pain Scale, where 1 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain, within 10 minutes of voiding.

    Post intervention pain scale assessment within 10 minutes following first void after the procedure.

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Strength of stream

    Within 10 minutes following the first post-procedure void.

  • Bladder pain

    Within 10 minutes following the first post-procedure void.

  • Hesitancy

    Within 10 minutes following the first post-procedure void.

  • Straining

    Within 10 minutes following the first post-procedure void.

  • Incomplete Emptying

    Within 10 minutes following the first post-procedure void.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Cystoscopy with use of obturator sheath

OTHER

This intervention arm will include the use of the obturator sheath upon entry into the urethra during rigid cystoscopy.

Procedure: Cystoscopy - with use of obturator sheath

Cystoscopy without use of obturator sheath

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This intervention arm will not include the use of the obturator sheath upon entry into the urethra during rigid cystoscopy, but will consist of using the telescope under direct visualization.

Procedure: Cystoscopy - without use of obturator sheath

Interventions

The intervention arm will include the use of the obturator sheath upon entry into the urethra during rigid cystoscopy.

Cystoscopy with use of obturator sheath

The intervention arm will not include the use of the obturator sheath upon entry into the urethra during rigid cystoscopy, but will consist of using the telescope under direct visualization.

Cystoscopy without use of obturator sheath

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female patients scheduled for gynecological procedures where cystoscopy is indicated
  • Ability to comprehend and participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • \< 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Current pelvic mesh erosion
  • Exposure or pain complications from mesh
  • Genitourinary malignancy;
  • History of recurrent urinary tract infection (e.g., 2 in 6 months)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Michigan State University

East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, United States

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Ellerkmann RM, Dunn JS, McBride AW, Kummer LG, Melick CF, Bent AE, Blomquist JL. A comparison of anticipated pain before and pain rating after the procedure in patients who undergo cystourethroscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):66-9. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.377.

    PMID: 12861140BACKGROUND
  • Nguyen CT, Babineau DC, Jones JS. Impact of urologic resident training on patient pain and morbidity associated with office-based cystoscopy. Urology. 2008 May;71(5):782-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.032.

    PMID: 18455622BACKGROUND
  • Quiroz LH, Shobeiri SA, Nihira MA, Brady J, Wild RA. Randomized trial comparing office flexible to rigid cystoscopy in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Nov;23(11):1625-30. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1777-0. Epub 2012 May 9.

    PMID: 22569690BACKGROUND
  • Yerlikaya G, Laml T, Elenskaia K, Hanzal E, Kolbl H, Umek W. Pain perception during outpatient cystoscopy: a prospective controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Feb;173:101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

    PMID: 24300559BACKGROUND
  • Greenstein A, Greenstein I, Senderovich S, Mabjeesh NJ. Is diagnostic cystoscopy painful? Analysis of 1,320 consecutive procedures. Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Jul-Aug;40(4):533-8. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.04.13.

    PMID: 25251958BACKGROUND
  • Seklehner S, Remzi M, Fajkovic H, Saratlija-Novakovic Z, Skopek M, Resch I, Duvnjak M, Hruby S, Librenjak D, Hubner W, Breinl E, Riedl C, Engelhardt PF. Prospective multi-institutional study analyzing pain perception of flexible and rigid cystoscopy in men. Urology. 2015 Apr;85(4):737-41. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.01.007.

    PMID: 25817101BACKGROUND
  • Casteleijn NF, Vriesema JL, Stomps SP, van Balen OL, Cornel EB. The effect of office based flexible and rigid cystoscopy on pain experience in female patients. Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Jan;58(1):48-53. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.1.48. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

    PMID: 28097268BACKGROUND
  • Dougher E, Zoorob D, Thomas D, Hagan J, Peacock L. The Effect of Lidocaine Gel on Pain Perception During Diagnostic Flexible Cystoscopy in Women: A Randomized Control Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):178-184. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000680.

    PMID: 30807424BACKGROUND
  • Rappaport YH, Beberashvili I, Zisman A, Stav K. Is Meatal Analgesia Necessary for Pain Reduction During Cystoscopy in Females? A Prospective Randomized Study. Urology. 2020 Dec;146:79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.052. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

    PMID: 32920032BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dysuria

Interventions

Cystoscopy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisDiagnostic Techniques, UrologicalMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeUrologic Surgical ProceduresUrogenital Surgical Procedures

Study Officials

  • Todd Moyerbrailean, DO, FACOG

    Michigan State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2021

First Posted

December 9, 2021

Study Start

December 22, 2021

Primary Completion

March 29, 2022

Study Completion

March 29, 2022

Last Updated

April 7, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will be shared with members of the investigation team.

Locations