Study Stopped
PI employment status change inhibiting continued recruitment
Pain Outcomes During Rigid Cystoscopy in Females With and Without Cystoscopic Sheath Obturator
The Assessment of Pain Outcomes During Rigid Cystoscopy in Females With and Without the Use of the Rigid Cystoscope Obturator: A Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
68
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rigid cystoscopy is a common procedure to evaluate lower urinary tract symptoms in females. This procedure can be done with or without an instrument called a sheath obturator. Both techniques are used by surgeons and are considered safe, but have never been studied to see if one technique leads to less discomfort with the patient's first void after the procedure. The obturator's use may potentially reduce urethral irritation and bothersome postprocedural symptoms, primarily dysuria. The investigators aim to determine whether there is a difference in dysuria outcomes postoperatively when cystoscopy is performed with or without an obturator.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 29, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 29, 2022
CompletedApril 7, 2022
March 1, 2022
3 months
November 23, 2021
March 29, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-Procedure Dysuria
The participant will be asked to void within 10 minutes of the completed procedure. The participant will then complete a Visual Analog Numeric Pain Scale, where 1 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain, within 10 minutes of voiding.
Post intervention pain scale assessment within 10 minutes following first void after the procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Strength of stream
Within 10 minutes following the first post-procedure void.
Bladder pain
Within 10 minutes following the first post-procedure void.
Hesitancy
Within 10 minutes following the first post-procedure void.
Straining
Within 10 minutes following the first post-procedure void.
Incomplete Emptying
Within 10 minutes following the first post-procedure void.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cystoscopy with use of obturator sheath
OTHERThis intervention arm will include the use of the obturator sheath upon entry into the urethra during rigid cystoscopy.
Cystoscopy without use of obturator sheath
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis intervention arm will not include the use of the obturator sheath upon entry into the urethra during rigid cystoscopy, but will consist of using the telescope under direct visualization.
Interventions
The intervention arm will include the use of the obturator sheath upon entry into the urethra during rigid cystoscopy.
The intervention arm will not include the use of the obturator sheath upon entry into the urethra during rigid cystoscopy, but will consist of using the telescope under direct visualization.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients scheduled for gynecological procedures where cystoscopy is indicated
- Ability to comprehend and participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- \< 18 years
- Pregnancy
- Current pelvic mesh erosion
- Exposure or pain complications from mesh
- Genitourinary malignancy;
- History of recurrent urinary tract infection (e.g., 2 in 6 months)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Michigan State University
East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, United States
Related Publications (9)
Ellerkmann RM, Dunn JS, McBride AW, Kummer LG, Melick CF, Bent AE, Blomquist JL. A comparison of anticipated pain before and pain rating after the procedure in patients who undergo cystourethroscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):66-9. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.377.
PMID: 12861140BACKGROUNDNguyen CT, Babineau DC, Jones JS. Impact of urologic resident training on patient pain and morbidity associated with office-based cystoscopy. Urology. 2008 May;71(5):782-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.032.
PMID: 18455622BACKGROUNDQuiroz LH, Shobeiri SA, Nihira MA, Brady J, Wild RA. Randomized trial comparing office flexible to rigid cystoscopy in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Nov;23(11):1625-30. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1777-0. Epub 2012 May 9.
PMID: 22569690BACKGROUNDYerlikaya G, Laml T, Elenskaia K, Hanzal E, Kolbl H, Umek W. Pain perception during outpatient cystoscopy: a prospective controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Feb;173:101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
PMID: 24300559BACKGROUNDGreenstein A, Greenstein I, Senderovich S, Mabjeesh NJ. Is diagnostic cystoscopy painful? Analysis of 1,320 consecutive procedures. Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Jul-Aug;40(4):533-8. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.04.13.
PMID: 25251958BACKGROUNDSeklehner S, Remzi M, Fajkovic H, Saratlija-Novakovic Z, Skopek M, Resch I, Duvnjak M, Hruby S, Librenjak D, Hubner W, Breinl E, Riedl C, Engelhardt PF. Prospective multi-institutional study analyzing pain perception of flexible and rigid cystoscopy in men. Urology. 2015 Apr;85(4):737-41. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.01.007.
PMID: 25817101BACKGROUNDCasteleijn NF, Vriesema JL, Stomps SP, van Balen OL, Cornel EB. The effect of office based flexible and rigid cystoscopy on pain experience in female patients. Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Jan;58(1):48-53. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.1.48. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
PMID: 28097268BACKGROUNDDougher E, Zoorob D, Thomas D, Hagan J, Peacock L. The Effect of Lidocaine Gel on Pain Perception During Diagnostic Flexible Cystoscopy in Women: A Randomized Control Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):178-184. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000680.
PMID: 30807424BACKGROUNDRappaport YH, Beberashvili I, Zisman A, Stav K. Is Meatal Analgesia Necessary for Pain Reduction During Cystoscopy in Females? A Prospective Randomized Study. Urology. 2020 Dec;146:79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.052. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
PMID: 32920032BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Todd Moyerbrailean, DO, FACOG
Michigan State University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2021
First Posted
December 9, 2021
Study Start
December 22, 2021
Primary Completion
March 29, 2022
Study Completion
March 29, 2022
Last Updated
April 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will be shared with members of the investigation team.