NCT05151939

Brief Summary

Therefore, a high number of procedures is necessary to achieve EUS competency, but interobserver agreement still varies widely. Artificial intelligence (AI) aided recognition of anatomical structures may improve the training process and inter-observer agreement. Robles-Medranda et al. developed an AI model that recognizes normal anatomical structures during linear and radial EUS evaluations. We pursue to design an external validation of our developed AI model, considering an endoscopist expert as the gold standard.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2021

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 26, 2021

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 30, 2021

Status Verified

December 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

November 26, 2021

Last Update Submit

December 10, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Endoscopic ultrasoundArtificial intelligence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Overall accuracy of Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) artificial intelligence (AI) model for identifying normal mediastinal and abdominal organ/anatomic strictures

    Overall accuracy features will be calculated: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, and observed agreement. In addition, there will be defined the following probabilities: * True-positive (TP): mediastinal/abdominal organ/anatomic stricture recognized by the EUS-AI model. The expert endoscopist previously correctly identified it. * False-positive (FP): mediastinal/abdominal organ/anatomic stricture recognized by the EUS-AI model. The expert endoscopist previously correctly discharged its visualization. * False-negative (FN): mediastinal/abdominal organ/anatomic stricture not recognized by the EUS-AI model. The expert endoscopist previously correctly identified it. * True-negative (TN): mediastinal/abdominal organ/anatomic stricture not recognized by the EUS-AI model. The expert endoscopist previously correctly discharged its visualization.

    Three months

Study Arms (1)

Patients with normal mediastinal and abdominal organ/anatomic strictures

Adult patients with normal mediastinal and abdominal organ/anatomic strictures after imaging test and EUS assessment due to chronic dyspepsia.

Diagnostic Test: Identification or discharge visualization of mediastinal and abdominal organ/anatomic strictures through Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) videos by an expert endoscopistDiagnostic Test: Recognition of mediastinal and abdominal organ/anatomic strictures through Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) videos using artificial intelligence (AI)

Interventions

An expert endoscopist will select a dataset of mediastinal and abdominal EUS videos (one per patient). An expert endoscopist will identify or discharge visualization of the following organs correctly: aorta, vertebral spine, aortic arch, trachea, AP window, left kidney, liver, spleen, pancreas body, pancreas tail, coeliac trunk, splenic artery, splenic vein, inferior vena cava, adrenal gland, right kidney, gallbladder, common bile duct, ampulla of Vater, portal vein.

Patients with normal mediastinal and abdominal organ/anatomic strictures

Using the same previous dataset of mediastinal and abdominal EUS videos, the EUS-AI model will recognize the following organs: aorta, vertebral spine, aortic arch, trachea, AP window, left kidney, liver, spleen, pancreas body, pancreas tail, coeliac trunk, splenic artery, splenic vein, inferior vena cava, adrenal gland, right kidney, gallbladder, common bile duct, ampulla of Vater, portal vein. Considering each patient (and not data frame videos) as the study unit, a contingency table per each mediastinal and abdominal organ/anatomic stricture will be designed.

Patients with normal mediastinal and abdominal organ/anatomic strictures

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 79 Years
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients with normal mediastinal and abdominal organ/anatomic strictures after imaging test and EUS assessment due to chronic dyspepsia.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with no history of the thorax and abdominal abnormalities confirmed through an imaging test requested for healthcare purposes in the last twelve months (e.g., thorax X-ray and abdominal ultrasound or thorax and abdominal CT)
  • Patients who undergo EUS assessment due to chronic dyspepsia.

You may not qualify if:

  • Morphological alteration on at least one mediastinal and abdominal organ/anatomic strictures documented through any imaging test or EUS.
  • Uncontrolled coagulopathy, kidney/liver failure, or any comorbidity with a meaningful impact on cardiac risk assessment (NHYA III/IV);
  • Refuse to participate in the study or to sign corresponding informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases

Guayaquil, Guayas, 090505, Ecuador

RECRUITING

Related Publications (9)

  • Zhang J, Zhu L, Yao L, Ding X, Chen D, Wu H, Lu Z, Zhou W, Zhang L, An P, Xu B, Tan W, Hu S, Cheng F, Yu H. Deep learning-based pancreas segmentation and station recognition system in EUS: development and validation of a useful training tool (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Oct;92(4):874-885.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.071. Epub 2020 May 6.

    PMID: 32387499BACKGROUND
  • Kuwahara T, Hara K, Mizuno N, Haba S, Okuno N, Koda H, Miyano A, Fumihara D. Current status of artificial intelligence analysis for endoscopic ultrasonography. Dig Endosc. 2021 Jan;33(2):298-305. doi: 10.1111/den.13880. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

    PMID: 33098123BACKGROUND
  • Robles-Medranda C, Oleas R, Del Valle R, Mendez JC, Alcívar-Vásquez JM, Puga-Tejada M, Lukashok H. Intelligence for real-time anatomical recognition during endoscopic ultrasound evaluation: a pilot study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2021; 93(6), AB221. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIE.2021.03.491

    BACKGROUND
  • Udristoiu AL, Cazacu IM, Gruionu LG, Gruionu G, Iacob AV, Burtea DE, Ungureanu BS, Costache MI, Constantin A, Popescu CF, Udristoiu S, Saftoiu A. Real-time computer-aided diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses from endoscopic ultrasound imaging based on a hybrid convolutional and long short-term memory neural network model. PLoS One. 2021 Jun 28;16(6):e0251701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251701. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34181680BACKGROUND
  • Yao L, Zhang J, Liu J, Zhu L, Ding X, Chen D, Wu H, Lu Z, Zhou W, Zhang L, Xu B, Hu S, Zheng B, Yang Y, Yu H. A deep learning-based system for bile duct annotation and station recognition in linear endoscopic ultrasound. EBioMedicine. 2021 Mar;65:103238. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103238. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

    PMID: 33639404BACKGROUND
  • Tonozuka R, Mukai S, Itoi T. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Disorders. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;11(1):18. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11010018.

    PMID: 33374181BACKGROUND
  • Marya NB, Powers PD, Chari ST, Gleeson FC, Leggett CL, Abu Dayyeh BK, Chandrasekhara V, Iyer PG, Majumder S, Pearson RK, Petersen BT, Rajan E, Sawas T, Storm AC, Vege SS, Chen S, Long Z, Hough DM, Mara K, Levy MJ. Utilisation of artificial intelligence for the development of an EUS-convolutional neural network model trained to enhance the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gut. 2021 Jul;70(7):1335-1344. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322821. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

    PMID: 33028668BACKGROUND
  • Minoda Y, Ihara E, Komori K, Ogino H, Otsuka Y, Chinen T, Tsuda Y, Ando K, Yamamoto H, Ogawa Y. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound with artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Gastroenterol. 2020 Dec;55(12):1119-1126. doi: 10.1007/s00535-020-01725-4. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

    PMID: 32918102BACKGROUND
  • Cazacu IM, Udristoiu A, Gruionu LG, Iacob A, Gruionu G, Saftoiu A. Artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer: Toward precision diagnosis. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Nov-Dec;8(6):357-359. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_76_19. No abstract available.

    PMID: 31854344BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Congenital AbnormalitiesConstriction, Pathologic

Interventions

Endosonography

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

UltrasonographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Study Officials

  • Carlos Robles-Medranda

    Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Carlos Robles-Medranda

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2021

First Posted

December 9, 2021

Study Start

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion

March 30, 2022

Study Completion

June 30, 2022

Last Updated

December 30, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations