Study Stopped
Main researcher (Jonathan Lee) left the institution. Once he left, recruitment did not occur.
Trigger Point Injections Versus Lidocaine Patch for Myofascial Pain in the Emergency Department
A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Trigger Point Injections With 1% Lidocaine Versus 5% Lidocaine Patch for Myofascial Pain in the Emergency Department
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this trial is to investigate the efficacy of trigger point injections with 1% lidocaine in reducing myofascial back and neck pain in the Emergency Department compared to lidocaine patches 5%.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Nov 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2022
CompletedFebruary 13, 2026
November 1, 2023
8 months
September 8, 2021
February 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
absolute change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain
Pain on a scale of 1-10. Minimum value is 1, maximum value is 10. Higher score means higher level of pain while lower score means lower level of pain.
0 minutes and 20-minutes post- treatment, and every 30-60 minutes thereafter until discharge or admission and we will give the patient a hand out so that they can record their pain scores for up to 5 days after their emergency department visit.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
use of other medications for treatment of pain including medications administered
From initiation of the study up to 5 days post discharge
disposition times
From initiation of the study up to the point the patient is discharged from the emergency department
satisfaction/experience surveys regarding their treatment
Immediately after the intervention is performed/administered
Study Arms (2)
Trigger point with 1% Lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALThe physician will withdraw 1cc of 1% lidocaine in a 25g needle, sterilely prep the field with a Chloraprep applicator, use index, and middle finger to squeeze the borders of the trigger point and raise the central aspect of the trigger point, insert the needle at 90-degree angle up to 5/8' deep, inject 1cc of the 1% lidocaine after ensuring needle is not in a blood vessel, removing the needle, and then covering the insertion site with a sterile bandage.
5% Lidocaine Patch
ACTIVE COMPARATOR5% lidocaine patch will be placed at the point of maximal tenderness upon palpation. Location of placement will be described and instructed by physician and placed by nursing staff.
Interventions
Will place lidocaine patch onto skin overlaying point of maximal tenderness
Previously discussed in prior section.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- Diagnosed with myofascial pain of the posterior neck or back. \*The diagnosis of myofascial pain was based on established criteria of having a palpable taut band (trigger point) that when depressed reproduced the patient's pain.
You may not qualify if:
- midline spinal tenderness
- evidence of radiculopathy
- pregnant
- have an allergy to lidocaine
- altered or deemed incapable of making informed consent
- had signs of infection or skin breakdown over the trigger point.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Emergency Room at UCI Medical Center
Orange, California, 92868, United States
Related Publications (6)
Yanuck J, Saadat S, Lee JB, Jen M, Chakravarthy B. Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial on Trigger Point Injections With 1% Lidocaine Versus Conventional Approaches for Myofascial Pain in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):364-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
PMID: 32712034BACKGROUNDSkootsky SA, Jaeger B, Oye RK. Prevalence of myofascial pain in general internal medicine practice. West J Med. 1989 Aug;151(2):157-60.
PMID: 2788962BACKGROUNDScott NA, Guo B, Barton PM, Gerwin RD. Trigger point injections for chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Pain Med. 2009 Jan;10(1):54-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00526.x. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
PMID: 18992040BACKGROUNDGarvey TA, Marks MR, Wiesel SW. A prospective, randomized, double-blind evaluation of trigger-point injection therapy for low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Sep;14(9):962-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198909000-00008.
PMID: 2528826BACKGROUNDAnnaswamy TM, De Luigi AJ, O'Neill BJ, Keole N, Berbrayer D. Emerging concepts in the treatment of myofascial pain: a review of medications, modalities, and needle-based interventions. PM R. 2011 Oct;3(10):940-61. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.06.013.
PMID: 22024326BACKGROUNDAffaitati G, Fabrizio A, Savini A, Lerza R, Tafuri E, Costantini R, Lapenna D, Giamberardino MA. A randomized, controlled study comparing a lidocaine patch, a placebo patch, and anesthetic injection for treatment of trigger points in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: evaluation of pain and somatic pain thresholds. Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):705-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.006.
PMID: 19446144BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jonathan Lee, MD
UCI Department of Emergency Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Given the trigger point injection is physician performed, and very different from placing a lidocaine patch, we cannot blind investigators nor the patient to the intervention. We will, however, blind our outcome assessors in regards to which intervention the patient had received.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2021
First Posted
December 9, 2021
Study Start
November 1, 2021
Primary Completion
June 30, 2022
Study Completion
June 30, 2022
Last Updated
February 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share