Anatomical Feasibility of an Off-the-shelf Scalloped Stent-graft for Infrarenal Abdominal Aneurysm With a Hostile Neck
ReSTHoNe
1 other identifier
observational
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In clinical practice a lot of EVAR cases are performed IFU for adverse neck anatomy(6) with acceptable short- and mid-term outcomes, but the long-term durability is currently an issue (7). Neck length shorter than 15 mm and angulation are two of. neck charteristics. that contribute more to define an "hostile neck" (8). The issue linked to the anatomical not feasibility of standard EVAR in patients not eligible for OR can be solved with custom made devices (CMD), but they were limited by high production costs and long time for creations (10-12 weeks)1. Nowadays no one off-the-shelf device aimed to overcome neck hostility in AAA is available on the market. The present study aims at evaluating the anatomical applicability of an off-the-shelf scalloped stent-graft to treat infrarenal AAA with a short and/or angulated neck.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2022
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedFebruary 6, 2024
February 1, 2024
5 months
November 25, 2021
February 4, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Anatomica feasibility and applicability of an "off-the-shelf" scallopped stent-graft measured mesured fitting three device model with data recorded from CTA of patients with AAA treted in our unit
observational study on the anatomical applicability in the coordinator center of an off-the-shelf scalloped device to treat infrarenal AAA with short and/or angulated neck. 3 different endograft designs were constructed. The preoperative measurements were made according to a previously described methodology. The models were matched with each preoperative CTA measure in order to evaluate if they fit or not in the index patients.
6-months
Study Arms (1)
Patients ttreatted for AAA
Patients affected by AAA and treated att our institution with EVAR and/or Open Repair between 2010 and 2020
Interventions
Any pre-operattive CTA of the patients of the cohort will be carefully evaluated to determine the theoric anatomical feasibility of an off the shelf Endograft, particularly in patients with an angulated and short aortic neck
Eligibility Criteria
All patients affected by AAAs and electively treated with EVAR or OR in the Vascular Surgery Unit of Modena e Reggio Emilia from 2010 to 2020 were considered eligible for the ex-vivo feasibility study. Mandatory condittion for tthhe enrollemnt is an available 2.5mm CTA.
You may qualify if:
- Patients Electively treated with EVAR or AAA at the coordinator center
- Age \>18
- Both sex
- Preoperative 2.5mm CTA available
- Written informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
AOU di Modena, OCB
Baggiovara, Modena, 411266, Italy
Related Publications (10)
Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, Allaire E, Bown M, Cohnert T, Dick F, van Herwaarden J, Karkos C, Koelemay M, Kolbel T, Loftus I, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell J, Szeberin Z, Esvs Guidelines Committee, de Borst GJ, Chakfe N, Debus S, Hinchliffe R, Kakkos S, Koncar I, Kolh P, Lindholt JS, de Vega M, Vermassen F, Document Reviewers, Bjorck M, Cheng S, Dalman R, Davidovic L, Donas K, Earnshaw J, Eckstein HH, Golledge J, Haulon S, Mastracci T, Naylor R, Ricco JB, Verhagen H. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;57(1):8-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Dec 5. No abstract available.
PMID: 30528142BACKGROUNDGimenez-Gaibar A, Gonzalez-Canas E, Solanich-Valldaura T, Herranz-Pinilla C, Rioja-Artal S, Ferraz-Huguet E. Could Preoperative Neck Anatomy Influence Follow-up of EVAR? Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;43:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.12.011. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
PMID: 28390913BACKGROUNDCaradu C, Berard X, Midy D, Ducasse E. Influence of Anatomic Angulations in Chimney and Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;43:104-114. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
PMID: 28258015BACKGROUNDSpeziale F, Sirignano P, Setacci F, Menna D, Capoccia L, Mansour W, Galzerano G, Setacci C. Immediate and two-year outcomes after EVAR in "on-label" and "off-label" neck anatomies using different commercially available devices. analysis of the experience of two Italian vascular centers. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Nov;28(8):1892-900. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.06.057. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
PMID: 25011083BACKGROUNDMuhs BE, Jordan W, Ouriel K, Rajaee S, de Vries JP. Matched cohort comparison of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with and without EndoAnchors. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jun;67(6):1699-1707. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.059. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
PMID: 29248241BACKGROUNDAbuRahma AF, DerDerian T, AbuRahma ZT, Hass SM, Yacoub M, Dean LS, Abu-Halimah S, Mousa AY. Comparative study of clinical outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysms repair in large diameter aortic necks (>31 mm) versus smaller necks. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;68(5):1345-1353.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.02.037. Epub 2018 May 22.
PMID: 29802043BACKGROUNDChaikof EL, Fillinger MF, Matsumura JS, Rutherford RB, White GH, Blankensteijn JD, Bernhard VM, Harris PL, Kent KC, May J, Veith FJ, Zarins CK. Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002 May;35(5):1061-6. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.123991. No abstract available.
PMID: 12021728BACKGROUNDMarone EM, Freyrie A, Ruotolo C, Michelagnoli S, Antonello M, Speziale F, Veroux P, Gargiulo M, Gaggiano A. Expert Opinion on Hostile Neck Definition in Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (a Delphi Consensus). Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;62:173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.049. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
PMID: 31394211BACKGROUNDGallitto E, Faggioli G, Spath P, Pini R, Mascoli C, Ancetti S, Stella A, Abualhin M, Gargiulo M. The risk of aneurysm rupture and target visceral vessel occlusion during the lead period of custom-made fenestrated/branched endograft. J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;72(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.273. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
PMID: 32063442BACKGROUNDChaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, Jackson BM, Lee WA, Mansour MA, Mastracci TM, Mell M, Murad MH, Nguyen LL, Oderich GS, Patel MS, Schermerhorn ML, Starnes BW. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):2-77.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044.
PMID: 29268916RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor in Vascular Surgery, Chief of department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2021
First Posted
December 9, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
February 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share