NCT05149651

Brief Summary

An experimental prospective double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) with parallel design. To evaluate the outcome of using 2 pulpotomy agents: Totalfill® as study group and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA®) as a control.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2017

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 11, 2018

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2018

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2020

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 8, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

November 22, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

May 11, 2018

Last Update Submit

November 17, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

TotalfillMTABioactivecalcium silicate cementPulpotomyPrimary molarsBioceramics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Clinical evaluation

    Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Clinical scoring criteria adapted from Zurn \& Seale (2008). Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.

    6 months follow-up

  • Clinical evaluation

    Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Clinical scoring criteria adapted from Zurn \& Seale (2008). Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.

    12 months follow-up

  • Radiographic evaluation

    Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Radiographic scoring criteria adapted from Zurn \& Seale (2008). Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.

    6 months follow-up

  • Radiographic evaluation

    Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Radiographic scoring criteria adapted from Zurn \& Seale (2008). Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.

    12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Time needed to place the material

    Immediately after each intervention for a maximum of the intervention

Study Arms (2)

Totalfill

EXPERIMENTAL

Totalfill® Bioceramic Root Repair Material -Fast Set Putty used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy

Drug: Totalfill

MTA

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

ProRoot White MTA® used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy

Drug: MTA

Interventions

Totalfill® Bioceramic Root Repair Material -Fast Set Putty is a pre-mixed, bioactive calcium silicate cement which used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy.

Also known as: Totalfill® Bioceramic Root Repair Material -Fast Set Putty
Totalfill
MTADRUG

ProRoot White MTA® is a bioactive calcium silicate cement which used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy.

Also known as: ProRoot White MTA®
MTA

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Years - 9 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA 1 patient, Patient is a completely healthy \& fit. No allergy or medical conditions.
  • Patient is indicated for treatment under General Anesthesia: young age, uncooperative and extensive treatment plan.
  • Parent agreed to participate in the study, and signed the written consent.
  • Patient attended the out-patients pediatric dental clinic in UZ Gent.
  • Vital primary molars (first or second) with deep caries cavity with pulpal exposure.
  • Only mandibular primary molar were included
  • No spontaneous pain
  • No history of swelling
  • No sinus tract/ fistula
  • Absent of tenderness in percussion
  • No pathological mobility
  • Restorable tooth (stainless steel crown can be placed)
  • Hemostasis can be achieved with a dry cotton pellet after removal of Coronal pulp.
  • At least 2/3rd of root is present
  • Absence of internal or external root resorption
  • +2 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • If one or more of the criteria mentioned above is not fulfilled, the teeth were excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ghent University hospital

Ghent, 9000, Belgium

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Pemetrexed

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

GuanineHypoxanthinesPurinonesPurinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsGlutamatesAmino Acids, AcidicAmino AcidsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsAmino Acids, Dicarboxylic

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The included teeth were assigned randomly into two groups (Totalfill or MTA) using randomized sequences generated by the computer using Random Integer Generator (RANDOM.ORG, Randomness and Integrity Services Ltd.). The allocation ratio to the groups was set to be equal. To ensure double blinding at both patients and evaluators level during treatment, the type of material was concealed from the patient, and the patient had no information which material was used. In addition, the type of material was not mentioned in the patient file. Instead, it was replaced by a 4 digit code. The operators were also blinded for the type of material during the whole procedure starting from tooth preparation till the hemostasis was achieved and then were only informed at the time of material placement.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: An experimental prospective double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) with parallel design.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2018

First Posted

December 8, 2021

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion

December 31, 2018

Study Completion

December 31, 2020

Last Updated

November 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The data will be available in the literature in the manuscript after publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
After publication

Locations