Efficacy of Totalfill® and ProRoot MTA® as Pulpotomy Agent in Primary Molars
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Pulpotomy of Primary Molars Using Totalfill® Bioceramic Root Repair Material -Fast Set Putty, and ProRoot White MTA®. A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
An experimental prospective double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) with parallel design. To evaluate the outcome of using 2 pulpotomy agents: Totalfill® as study group and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA®) as a control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2021
CompletedNovember 22, 2023
November 1, 2023
2 years
May 11, 2018
November 17, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Clinical evaluation
Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Clinical scoring criteria adapted from Zurn \& Seale (2008). Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.
6 months follow-up
Clinical evaluation
Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Clinical scoring criteria adapted from Zurn \& Seale (2008). Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.
12 months follow-up
Radiographic evaluation
Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Radiographic scoring criteria adapted from Zurn \& Seale (2008). Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.
6 months follow-up
Radiographic evaluation
Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Radiographic scoring criteria adapted from Zurn \& Seale (2008). Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.
12 months follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time needed to place the material
Immediately after each intervention for a maximum of the intervention
Study Arms (2)
Totalfill
EXPERIMENTALTotalfill® Bioceramic Root Repair Material -Fast Set Putty used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy
MTA
ACTIVE COMPARATORProRoot White MTA® used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy
Interventions
Totalfill® Bioceramic Root Repair Material -Fast Set Putty is a pre-mixed, bioactive calcium silicate cement which used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy.
ProRoot White MTA® is a bioactive calcium silicate cement which used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA 1 patient, Patient is a completely healthy \& fit. No allergy or medical conditions.
- Patient is indicated for treatment under General Anesthesia: young age, uncooperative and extensive treatment plan.
- Parent agreed to participate in the study, and signed the written consent.
- Patient attended the out-patients pediatric dental clinic in UZ Gent.
- Vital primary molars (first or second) with deep caries cavity with pulpal exposure.
- Only mandibular primary molar were included
- No spontaneous pain
- No history of swelling
- No sinus tract/ fistula
- Absent of tenderness in percussion
- No pathological mobility
- Restorable tooth (stainless steel crown can be placed)
- Hemostasis can be achieved with a dry cotton pellet after removal of Coronal pulp.
- At least 2/3rd of root is present
- Absence of internal or external root resorption
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- If one or more of the criteria mentioned above is not fulfilled, the teeth were excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Ghentlead
Study Sites (1)
Ghent University hospital
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The included teeth were assigned randomly into two groups (Totalfill or MTA) using randomized sequences generated by the computer using Random Integer Generator (RANDOM.ORG, Randomness and Integrity Services Ltd.). The allocation ratio to the groups was set to be equal. To ensure double blinding at both patients and evaluators level during treatment, the type of material was concealed from the patient, and the patient had no information which material was used. In addition, the type of material was not mentioned in the patient file. Instead, it was replaced by a 4 digit code. The operators were also blinded for the type of material during the whole procedure starting from tooth preparation till the hemostasis was achieved and then were only informed at the time of material placement.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2018
First Posted
December 8, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
November 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- After publication
The data will be available in the literature in the manuscript after publication