NCT05149040

Brief Summary

Do very elderly adults wish intensive care in the event of acute life-threatening illness and are their next of kin able to predict these preferences? Very elderly patients are a steeply increasing patient population in intensive care units (ICUs), but the overall benefit of intensive care for these patients remains controversial. Will ICU admission improve survival and quality of life, or will it prolong suffering and delay natural death? Little is known about very elderly Norwegians life sustaining treatment (LST) preferences in these situations where treatment benefit is uncertain. This project aims to improve critically ill very elderly patients' ICU trajectories by bringing forth knowledge about their treatment preferences, their family members' ability to predict these preferences, and by directing attention to the challenges of consent to critical care in cases of medical uncertainty. A selv administered, mailed survey will be distributed among 400 outpatients aged 80 years or older and their next of kin. Respondents will be recruited at the ophthalmologic, ear-nose-and-throat and orthopaedic outpatient clinics at Haukeland University Hospital Bergen, Norway. The investigators developed and validated a survey tool for this purpose, containing 3 hypothetical scenarios of acute life-threatening illness. The scenarios are randomly chosen from 20 hypothetical patient histories and are representative for ICU admission diagnoses in Norway and Europe. The participants will be asked for treatment choices, i.e. wishing admission to intensive care or not. A response option 'not wishing to engage in the treatment decision' is also provided. Furthermore, the questionnaire includes factors that may influence elderlies' treatment preferences and proxies' ability to predict these preferences including: demographics, religion, previous experience with and / or communication about critical illness, comorbidity, frailty, quality of life, and projections (i.e. the proxy's own treatment preferences). The respondents are requested to explain their choices by free-text comments after each scenario. They are also asked to elaborate how they wish next-of-kin should contribute to decision making in these cases. Additional space for free-text comments is provided in the end of the questionnaire. The study design is exploratory. Responses will be analysed with both quantitative statistics and qualitative methods.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,472

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2021

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 31, 2021

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 15, 2021

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 8, 2021

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2023

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 27, 2025

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 27, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

October 31, 2021

Results QC Date

December 16, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 11, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

consentgoals of treatmentproxy accuracyshared decision making

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Older Respondents Treatment Preferences in an Event of Acute Life-threatening Illness Warranting ICU Admission as Stated by Themselves and by Their Next of Kin Acting as Proxy

    Three mutually exclusive answer options in three randomly assigned clinically scenarios of acute critical illness in advanced age 1. Wishing ICU admission 2. Not wishing ICU admission 3. Not wanting to decide

    within 2 weeks of recruitment / upon completion of the questionnaire

Study Arms (2)

very elderly outpatients

outpatients (eyes, ear-nose-and throat, orthopaedic outpatient clinics at Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway) aged 80 years and older

Other: survey "Intensive care of very elderly: What do they wish for themselves?"

proxy

next of kin who likely would act as a proxy in a medical emergency, identified by the very elderly respondent

Other: survey "Intensive care of very elderly: What do they wish for themselves?"

Interventions

self-administered mailed survey

proxyvery elderly outpatients

Eligibility Criteria

Age80 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Community dwelling very elderly outpatients in the catchment area of Haukeland University Hospital, i.e. Greater Bergen Region, Western Norway.

You may not qualify if:

  • not consenting to participate
  • living in permanent care facility / nursing home
  • not able to complete the questionnaire owing to:
  • severely reduced vision / blindness
  • high degree of frailty (Clinical frailty scale ≥ 7)
  • cognitive impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Haukeland University Hospital

Bergen, 5021, Norway

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. G.L. Schwarz
Organization
Helse Bergen

Study Officials

  • Gabriele Leonie I Schwarz, MD

    Haukeland University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2021

First Posted

December 8, 2021

Study Start

November 15, 2021

Primary Completion

March 31, 2023

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

March 27, 2025

Results First Posted

March 27, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations