Study Stopped
Principal Investigator changing locations.
Urolift Pre-SBRT for Reduced Urinary Toxicity in Patients With BPH and Prostate Cancer.
Reduction of Urinary Toxicity of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) With Prostatic Urethral Lift (Urolift)
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many patients may face long-term urinary side effects following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), including increased urinary frequency, dysuria, and nocturia. The investigator hypothesizes that Urolift, which represents a novel minimally invasive therapy, may reduce acute and long-term urinary toxicity and side effects of radiation therapy (SBRT).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2028
January 27, 2026
January 1, 2026
5.5 years
November 23, 2021
January 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change in IPSS scores from baseline and one year post treatment
Patients will take a International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire to evaluate symptom severity at baseline and 1 year post treatment. IPSS scores range from 1 to 35, with 1-7 indicating mild symptoms, 8-19 indicating moderate symptoms, 20-35 indicating severe symptoms.
At baseline and one year post treatment
Change in IIEF score through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient will take the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) to evaluate changes in sexual function of patients through study completion, an average of 1 year. IIEF scores range from 6 to 30. IIEF lower scores indicate severe erectile dysfunction, while higher scores indicate mild/no erectile dysfunction.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in MSHQ through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patients will take the Men's sexual health questionnaire (MSHQ) to further evaluate patients' ability to have sex with their partner(s) or masturbate through study completion, an average of 1 year. Overall, study subjects will be assessed for possible change in hypogonadal, sexual function, and pain symptoms. Scores range from 16 to 125. Lower scores are considered most symptomatic, higher scores are least symptomatic.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in VAS score through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patients will use a visual analog scale (VAS) to describe their pain through study completion, an average of 1 year, to see if there is any changes in pain post treatment. Self-assessed maximum pain reported using a 0-100mm visual analog scale, where 100 signifies maximum pain and 0 signifies no pain.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in OAB-SF score through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patients will use a overactive bladder short form (OAB-SF) to describe their overactive bladder symptoms through study completion, an average of 1 year, to see if there is any changes in symptoms. The OAB-q SF has 2 main subscales: Symptom bother and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL). The two subscales are summed separately and transformed into scores ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score on the symptom bother scale indicates a greater symptom severity and a higher score on the HRQOL scale indicates a better HRQOL, so they are inversely related to each other. Since the OAB-q SF has no total score, higher scores indicate more severe symptoms or better quality of life, respectively. Lower scores indicate less severe symptoms or worse quality of life respectively.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in SF-12 score through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patients will use a short form 12 (SF-12) survey to measure their quality of life through study completion, an average of 1 year, to see if there is any changes. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning. A score of 50 or less on the PCS-12 has been recommended as a cut-off to determine a physical condition; while a score of 42 or less on the MCS-12 may be indicative of 'clinical depression'.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in medication usage through study completion, an average of 1 year
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (1)
Urolift
EXPERIMENTALThis is a single-arm study involving 1 year of follow-up. Study intervention involves a one-time administration of Urolift prior to SBRT for prostate cancer treatment.
Interventions
Study intervention involves a one-time administration of Urolift in out-patient setting prior to Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is 50 - 99 years of age
- Subject has provided informed consent
- Subject has diagnosis of prostate cancer requiring SBRT
- Subject is able to complete self-administered questionnaires
- Subject is a surgical candidate for Urolift
- Subject has a diagnosis of BPH
- Medical record documentation of prostate volume from 30-80 ml by TRUS
- Absence of a middle lobe
You may not qualify if:
- Life expectancy \< 2 years
- Currently enrolled in or plans to enroll in any concurrent drug or device study
- Concurrent androgen deprivation therapy
- Has an active infection (e.g., urinary tract infection or prostatitis)
- Diagnosis of or has received treatment for chronic prostatitis or chronic pelvic pain syndrome (e.g., nonbacterial chronic prostatitis)
- Subject has been diagnosed with a urethral stricture or bladder neck contracture within the last 180 days
- Subject has been diagnosed with 2 or more urethral strictures and/or bladder neck contractures within 5 years
- Diagnosis of lichen sclerosis
- Neurogenic bladder or other neurologic disorder that affects bladder function
- Diagnosis of polyneuropathy (e.g., diabetic)
- History of lower urinary tract surgery
- Subject has diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence that requires treatment or daily pad or device use
- Subject has been catheterized or has a PVR \> 400 ml in the 14 days prior to the surgical procedure
- Current diagnosis of bladder stones
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwell Healthlead
- NeoTract, Inc.collaborator
- Teleflexcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Northwell Health
Syosset, New York, 11791, United States
Related Publications (10)
Ng M, Leslie SW, Baradhi KM. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. 2024 Oct 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558920/
PMID: 32644346BACKGROUNDMcVary KT. BPH: epidemiology and comorbidities. Am J Manag Care. 2006 Apr;12(5 Suppl):S122-8.
PMID: 16613526BACKGROUNDAlcaraz A, Hammerer P, Tubaro A, Schroder FH, Castro R. Is there evidence of a relationship between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer? Findings of a literature review. Eur Urol. 2009 Apr;55(4):864-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.11.011. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
PMID: 19027219BACKGROUNDRoehrborn CG. Prostatic Urethral Lift: A Unique Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am. 2016 Aug;43(3):357-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.04.008.
PMID: 27476128BACKGROUNDChialastri P, Chialastri A, Mueller T. Does Prostatic Urethral Lift Reduce Urinary Medications? Trends in Medical Treatment Before and After Prostatic Urethral Lift. J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):657-662. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0848. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
PMID: 33198488BACKGROUNDCihan Y. The role and importance of SBRT in prostate cancer. Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Nov-Dec;44(6):1272-1274. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0484. No abstract available.
PMID: 30325604BACKGROUNDJanowski E, Chen LN, Kim JS, Lei S, Suy S, Collins B, Lynch J, Dritschilo A, Collins S. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer in men with large prostates (>/=50 cm(3)). Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov 15;9:241. doi: 10.1186/s13014-014-0241-3.
PMID: 25398516BACKGROUNDMbeutcha A, Chauveinc L, Bondiau PY, Chand ME, Durand M, Chevallier D, Amiel J, Kee DL, Hannoun-Levi JM. Salvage prostate re-irradiation using high-dose-rate brachytherapy or focal stereotactic body radiotherapy for local recurrence after definitive radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2017 Mar 9;12(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0789-9.
PMID: 28274241BACKGROUNDFuller DB, Wurzer J, Shirazi R, Bridge SS, Law J, Mardirossian G. High-dose-rate stereotactic body radiation therapy for postradiation therapy locally recurrent prostatic carcinoma: Preliminary prostate-specific antigen response, disease-free survival, and toxicity assessment. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Nov-Dec;5(6):e615-23. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
PMID: 26059509BACKGROUNDJiang P, Krockenberger K, Vonthein R, Tereszczuk J, Schreiber A, Liebau S, Huttenlocher S, Imhoff D, Balermpas P, Keller C, Dellas K, Baumann R, Rodel C, Hildebrandt G, Junemann KP, Merseburger AS, Katz A, Ziegler A, Blanck O, Dunst J. Hypo-fractionated SBRT for localized prostate cancer: a German bi-center single treatment group feasibility trial. Radiat Oncol. 2017 Aug 18;12(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0872-2.
PMID: 28821268BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bilal Chughtai, MD
Northwell Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2021
First Posted
December 8, 2021
Study Start
December 15, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2028
Last Updated
January 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share