Investigation of Strategies to Reduce the Impact of the Relative Age Effect in Kindergarten
2 other identifiers
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is now clear evidence that children entering kindergarten, that are relatively young for the grade (e.g., born in the months immediately preceding the school entry cut-off) are at significantly more risk for receiving an ADHD diagnosis and being prescribed stimulant medication. These risks appear to be related solely to age of entry when other explanatory variables are controlled. This situation, termed the "Relative Age Effect"has potentially serious consequences for kindergarten children (e.g., greater likelihood of being prescribed psychoactive medication to control behavior). The present proposal aims to develop a teacher intervention to attenuate the impact of the relative age effect on young kindergarteners with elevated ADHD symptoms, and test the correspondence between the hypothesized mechanisms and treatment outcomes related to ADHD (e.g., symptoms, impairment). Following intervention development and refinement, 60 children entering kindergarten in the fall, and young for the grade, will be randomly assigned to (1) Kindergarten as Usual (KAU); (2) a Relative Age Effect prevention intervention administered immediately; or (3) a Relative Age Effect prevention intervention administered mid-year. In the intervention groups, teachers will be introduced to the relative age effect, receive information on how to anchor behavioral ratings in developmental norms, and implement a positive behavioral support to support growth in the child across the kindergarten school year. Primary aims will be to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention approach as well as the ability of the team to retain young children in a longitudinal trial. Further, the hypothesized mechanisms (e.g., improved neurocognitive functioning; improved teacher use of positive behavioral supports) will be measured and correspondence to hypothesized outcomes (e.g., reduced ADHD symptoms and impairment) will be evaluated. Anticipated benefits include attenuation of any negative effects for children who receive intervention, and risks include breach of confidentiality and worsening of symptoms initially if an intervention is instituted. The knowledge to be gained is important as it could reduce untoward outcomes for the relatively youngest children in the grade.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 19, 2025
CompletedNovember 19, 2025
November 1, 2025
2.5 years
November 8, 2021
September 25, 2025
November 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale
Average score for ADHD symptom ratings on the Disruptive Behavior Disorders rating scale Average score ranges from 0.0 to 3.0 with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Baseline (Fall), 3 Months (Winter), 6 Months (Spring) and 12 Months (First Grade Follow-up)
Impairment Rating Scale
ADHD impairment - teacher rating. Average score ranges from 0.0 to 6.0 with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Baseline (Fall), 3 Months (Winter), 6 Months (Spring) and 12 Months (First Grade Follow-up)
Student Behavior Teacher Response Observation Code
Number of disruptive behaviors; higher counts equal the presence of more classroom rule violations
Baseline (Fall), 3 Months (Winter), 6 Months (Spring) and 12 Months (First Grade Follow-up)
Academic Performance Rating Scale
Teacher rating of academic productivity. Average scores range from 1.0 to 5.0 with lower scores indicating academic underperformance.
Baseline (Fall), 3 Months (Winter), 6 Months (Spring) and 12 Months (First Grade Follow-up)
Other Outcomes (3)
Number of Children Who Were Referred to Special Education
Collected at the end of the kindergarten school year, approximately 10 months from the start of study procedures.
Number of Children Who Were Prescribed Stimulant Medication
Collected at the end of the kindergarten school year, approximately 10 months from the start of study procedures.
Number of Children Who Were Retained in Kindergarten
Collected at the end of the kindergarten school year, approximately 10 months from the start of study procedures.
Study Arms (3)
School as Usual
ACTIVE COMPARATORSchool procedures as typically used and implemented.
Immediate Relative Age Effect Intervention
EXPERIMENTALRelative age effect intervention administered in the Fall in school.
Delayed Relative Age Effect Intervention
EXPERIMENTALRelative age effect intervention administered after the Winter break in school.
Interventions
School-based consultation to establish a developmentally appropriate daily behavior report; teacher education regarding developmentally appropriate behaviors; teacher consultation to promote positive behavior supports.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- enrolling in Kindergarten
- has a date of birth 4 months prior to the respective state cut-off for school entry
- does not have an Individualized Education program for behavioral concerns
- has not been retained in school or "red-shirted" by parents.
You may not qualify if:
- outside of the targeted birthdate range
- diagnosed with autism, psychosis, or disruptive mood dysregulation disorder
- taking psychoactive medication for mood, behavior, or inattention,
- in a classroom with an already enrolled study participant.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Florida International Universitylead
- University at Buffalocollaborator
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Center for Children and Families
Amherst, New York, 14226, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gregory A. Fabiano, Ph.D.
- Organization
- Florida International University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Observers are masked to group assignment of the participants
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2021
First Posted
December 3, 2021
Study Start
June 1, 2022
Primary Completion
November 30, 2024
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 19, 2025
Results First Posted
November 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Six months after the completion of the project.
- Access Criteria
- Data will be shared through the NIMH data-sharing repository.
De-identified, anonymous data will be shared for the main outcome measures of the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale and Impairment Rating Scale