Active Choice Regarding Cardiovascular Disease Risk
Actively Choosing How to Cope With an Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Randomised Web-Based Experiment
1 other identifier
interventional
743
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this web-based RCT, the investigators will investigate whether promoting an active choice regarding coping with an increased CVD risk results in better psychological outcomes (e.g., degree of active choice; commitment toward the chosen option) compared to usual care (i.e., a GP's advice to change one's lifestyle and take medication). By 'active choice' the investigators mean a conscious and autonomous choice in which an individual (a) becomes aware of a discrepancy between the current and desired situation; (b) understands what his/her CVD risk means, and what its causes and consequences are; (c) evaluates the pros and cons of the different options to cope with the risk; and (d) is clear about his/her values regarding the choice. The different options to cope with an increased CVD risk include: changing one's lifestyle; taking medication; doing both; or changing nothing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable cardiovascular-diseases
Started Jan 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable cardiovascular-diseases
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 19, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 8, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 8, 2022
CompletedMay 13, 2022
May 1, 2022
20 days
November 19, 2021
May 9, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Active choice
Self-constructed scale. Measures the degree to which participants make an active choice. The scale contains 11 items that have to be answered on a scale of 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree). A higher mean score on the scale indicates a better outcome.
Directly after the intervention
Intention strength
2 self-constructed questionnaire items on a scale of 1 (not strong at all) to 10 (very strong). Measure intention strength to perform the chosen behaviour (i.e., lifestyle change and/or taking medication). A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Directly after the intervention
Commitment
5 self-constructed questionnaire items on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 10 (very much). Measure commitment to perform the chosen behaviour (i.e., lifestyle change and/or taking medication). A higher mean score indicates a better outcome.
Directly after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Intention
Directly after the intervention
Self-efficacy
Directly after the intervention
Response efficacy
Directly after the intervention
Autonomous motivation subscale of the Treatment Motivation Questionnaire
Directly after the intervention
Knowledge
Directly after the intervention
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Perceived Health according to the Research and Development 36
Directly after the intervention
Control Preference Scale
Directly after the intervention
Study Arms (2)
Active choice
EXPERIMENTALThis intervention contains information and an assignment to foster an active choice regarding coping with an increased CVD risk. Participants will be presented a hypothetical 'heart age' of 16 years older than their actual age. They will be asked to imagine that this heart age really applies to them. Next, participants will receive information about the meaning of the risk, including its causes and potential consequences, and about four coping strategies: changing one's lifestyle; taking medication; doing both; or changing nothing. The pros and cons of each strategy will be presented, followed by a value-clarification exercise.
Control
OTHERThe control group will receive online information and advice that resembles GP's usual care. The information contains a hypothetical CVD risk: a risk of 31% to get CVD within 10 years. They will be asked to imagine that this risk really applies to them. Participants will read about an imaginary GP who advices to change one's lifestyle (i.e., quitting smoking; healthy diet; more physical activity), and to use medication to decrease the risk.
Interventions
The active choice intervention aims to promote an active choice regarding coping with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. This means that individuals should (a) become aware of a discrepancy between the current and desired situation; (b) understand what the CVD risk means, and what its causes and consequences are; (c) evaluate the pros and cons of the different options to cope with the risk; and (d) are clear about their values regarding the choice.
The control condition contains information that resembles usual care by a GP regarding CVD prevention
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 45-65 years
You may not qualify if:
- Suffering/ having suffered from CVD
- Being on lipid lowering or blood pressure lowering medication
- Suffering from diabetes
- kidney damage or rheumatism
- not being able to walk at least 100 meters
- being in a wheelchair
- pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VUMedicalCenter
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1018BT, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Landais LL, Jelsma JGM, Damman OC, Verhagen EALM, Timmermans DRM. Fostering active choice to empower behavioral change to reduce cardiovascular risk: A web-based randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0304897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304897. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39088470DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Danielle Timmermans, Prof
VU Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 19, 2021
First Posted
December 2, 2021
Study Start
January 19, 2022
Primary Completion
February 8, 2022
Study Completion
February 8, 2022
Last Updated
May 13, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- The study protocol will be permanently available. Participant data will be deleted 15 years after study completion.
- Access Criteria
- No access restrictions for the study protocol.
The study protocol will be made available online on clinicaltrials.gov. Patient data will only be shared upon reasonable request.