Proof-of-concept of a Robotic Knee Exoskeleton in Healthy Subjects and Hemiparetic Patients During Gait.
Evaluation of the Effects of the Unilateral Assistance Provided by a Robotic Knee Exoskeleton in the Gait Symmetry of Healthy Subjects and Hemiparetic Patients.
1 other identifier
interventional
3
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hemiparetic gait is characterized by strong asymmetries that could severely affect the quality of life of stroke survivors. This asymmetry is due to motor deficits in the paretic leg and the resulting compensations in the non-paretic limb. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the effect of actively promoting gait symmetry in hemiparetic patients by assessing the behavior of both paretic and non-paretic lower limbs. To this end, the investigators use a unilateral active Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis able to assist the paretic limb of hemiparetic patients during gait. The system is able to synchronize its action with the movement of the unassisted joints, promoting a natural and intuitive interaction. The device generate the assistance according to two differents strategies: (1) Replicating the movement of the helathy leg or (2) Inducing a healthy gait pattern on the paretic leg. The hypothesis is that a proper and natural interaction between the user and the exoskeleton would enable the patients to consider the robot action as a part of their own gait capability, improving their gait quality as consequence. Hemiparetic asymmetry is not only due to impairments in the affected limb, but also it is the consequence of biomechanical compensatory mechanisms that might arose in the non-paretic leg. We aim to assess the adaptation process of the subject to the exoskeleton assistance, and to evaluate the effects of such human-robot interaction in both paretic and non-paretic legs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2021
CompletedNovember 30, 2021
November 1, 2021
2 months
October 23, 2021
November 17, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Feasibility of the prototype device
The joints motion is measured by Inertial Sensors
During the last two minutes of the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Symmetry of step length from thigh and shank kinematics
During the last two minutes of the intervention
Symmetry of step time
During the last two minutes of the intervention
Interventions
Subjects were instructed to walk on a treadmill at a constant speed during trials of 5 minutes. All subjects carried out four trials: (1) NoExo: subjects only wore the sensors to acquire their basal motion; (2) Free: subjects wore the exoskeleton although the actuator was mechanically decoupled, so it enabled the free movement of the knee; (3) Echo: the device provided gait assistance following the Echo-control strategy; and (4) Pattern: the device provided gait assistance following the Pattern strategy. During trials, patients wore a safety harness that did not support any weight. Previously to the execution of the trials, the gait velocity was self-selected by the subjects to a comfortable level. Subjects rested between trials for five minutes. Healthy subjects also performed a previous trial under variable gait speed. They walked over the treadmill as in the NoExo condition, although the gait speed randomly varies from 1km/h to 3km/h in 0.2km/h steps for 15 seconds at least.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Acute musculoskeletal diseases
- Peripheral vascular diseases
- Acute cardiopulmonary diseases
- Acute neurological diseases
- Excessive spasticity in any joint of the lower limb (Ashworth scale\> 2)
- Joint mobility restriction of lower limb joints due to any cause
- Pain due to impaired mobility of the lower limb
- Inability to use robotic exoskeleton prototypes due to his/her health condition.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Spanish National Research Councillead
- Hospital Beata María Anacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Beata María Ana
Madrid, 28041, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julio S. Lora-Millan
Spanish National Research Council
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Responsible Engineer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2021
First Posted
November 30, 2021
Study Start
February 15, 2021
Primary Completion
April 20, 2021
Study Completion
April 20, 2021
Last Updated
November 30, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- CSR
- Time Frame
- Immediately following publication, no end date
- Access Criteria
- Access will be subject to methodologically sound proposals and it will be approval by scientific investigator (julio.lora@csic.es)
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.