"Evaluation of Clinical Performance and Success Rate of CAD/CAM Versus Conventional Band and Loop Space Maintainer"
1 other identifier
interventional
18
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study is to evaluate and compare CAD/CAM zircon space maintainer and conventional metal of band and loop space maintainers in terms of plaque deposits and gingival health and, the success rate of the appliances in terms of: survival time, cement loss and appliance breakage. And to compare both appliances in terms of patient satisfaction. This study consists of two parts: in vivo part (split mouth RCT) and in vitro part: In vivo study: Its sample size was found to be (36) cases (i.e. 18 case per group). Sample size calculation was performed using G\*Power version 3.1.9.7 Sample size will be increased by about 10% to compensate for the drop-out. In this in vivo study split mouth will be randomly divided into two groups: Group 1: Conventional metal band and loop space maintainer Group 2: CAD/CAM zircon band and loop space maintainer In vitro study: its sample size was found to be (24) samples (i.e. 8 samples per group). Sample size calculation was performed using G\*Power version 3.1.9.7 Sample size will be increased by about 10% to compensate for the drop-out. Grouping: The zirconia specimen divided randomly into three groups according to type of cements: Group 1: Self-adhesive resin cement Group 2: Resin-modified glass ionomer cement Group 3: Universal bioactive cement
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 26, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedJanuary 31, 2024
January 1, 2024
5 months
November 2, 2021
January 30, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Clinical success: Evaluate and compare CAD/CAM zircon space maintainer and conventional metal of band and loop space maintainers in terms of plaque deposits (Plaque index)
Plaque index, that is running in a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 means no plaque,1 film of plaque adhering to free gingival margin,2 moderate accumulation of soft deposits on the tooth and gingival margin, and 3 means abundance of soft debris.
Up to 12 months
Clinical success: Evaluate and compare CAD/CAM zircon space maintainer and conventional metal of band and loop space maintainers in terms of Gingival health, by assessing the gingival index.
Gingival health, scores from 0 to 3 where 0 no inflammation, 1slight redness no bleeding on probing, 2 redness and bleeding on probing, and 3 severe inflammation with edema and ulceration to spontaneous bleeding,47 and patient satisfaction.
up to 12 months
The success rate of appliances in terms of survival time.
Clinical evaluation of success rates of the modalities regarding survival time by checking both space maintainers and identify if there is cement loss or breakage of the appliances during the follow up period.
Up to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Compare both appliances in terms of patient satisfaction.
Up to 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Group 1(study group): CAD/CAM zircon band and loop space maintainer
EXPERIMENTALSolid monolithic zirconia material which utilizes CAD/CAM technology for its designing and milling of the restoration will be used for fabrication of the space maintainer.
Group 2(control): Conventional metal band and loop space maintainer
ACTIVE COMPARATORStainless steel band and loop space maintainer will be made. Stainless steel appropriate band will be selected according to the size of the abutment teeth then design of the loop will be obtained, then will be send to the laboratory for soldering.
Interventions
Solid monolithic zirconia material which utilizes CAD/CAM technology for its designing and milling of the restoration will be used for fabrication of the space maintainer.
Stainless steel appropriate band will be selected according to the size of the abutment teeth and then design of the loop will be obtained, then will be send to the laboratory for soldering.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged :
- A-minimum:4years B-maximum: 7 years old
- Patients who are medically free
- Premature loss of bilateral primary molar.
- Sound and healthy buccal and lingual surfaces of selected primary molars.
You may not qualify if:
- Children with dental abnormalities (cross bite, open bite, and deep bite).
- Parafunctional oral habits.
- Carious lingual and buccal surfaces of primary molars.
- Lack of patient/parent compliance and cooperation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Gehan G. Allam, PHD
Ain Shams Univesity
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant teacher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2021
First Posted
November 26, 2021
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion
November 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 31, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share