Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) With vs Without IntraOperative Application of Lugol's Iodine
LLETZ-IOLI
1 other identifier
interventional
230
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women and one of the leading causes of death in women worldwide. Pre-cancerous lesions (dysplasias) are detected by the gynecologist's preventive smear test and can thus contribute to a 100% chance of cure if they are clarified by a colposcopic examination as part of the dysplasia consultation and, if necessary, surgically removed. Conization (= surgical removal of a cone of tissue from the cervix) is the method of choice for removing the diseased tissue. LLETZ conization (Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone) is the worldwide standard surgical procedure for conization. There is risk of local persistence of the precancerous lesion if the cervical dysplasia is not completely removed. To minimize this, the iodine test can be used. Here, a 5% iodine solution (so-called Lugol's solution) is dabbed onto the cervix uteri, resulting in an intense and characteristic brown staining of the healthy cervical epithelium. Sites without staining are termed iodine negative and may contain dysplastic cells. The strength of iodine testing lies in its high specificity, i.e., the reliable ability to exclude false-positive results. The purpose of intraoperative iodine staining is to select the resection line with a high degree of certainty in healthy (i.e., iodine-positive) tissue in order to reduce the rate of cervical dysplasia that is not completely removed (so-called non-in-sano resection, or R1 resection). Systematic survey data from the dysplasia units certified in Germany on the question of the use of intraoperative iodine testing in Germany are lacking, as is the literature as a whole. For example, the current S3 guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics on the diagnosis and treatment of cervical dysplasia (as of March 2020) names intraoperative iodine testing only as a possible option for performing LLETZ. In this prospective, randomized study, the investigators aim to answer the question whether LLETZ performed with the help of an iodine test with selection of the resection line in the iodine-positive area leads to a lower rate of R1 resections compared to the standard LLETZ without iodine test.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 11, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 24, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 17, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 16, 2025
CompletedApril 14, 2026
April 1, 2026
3.7 years
November 11, 2021
April 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of R1 resections
The primary outcome parameter is the rate of R1 resections, defined as the presence of a CIN I, CIN II, or CIN III at the ectocervical and/or endocervical resection margin, as indicated in the histopathologic report.
Specimen from surgery (result expected 1-2 days after surgery)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Cone mass
During surgery, immediately after the excision
Procedure duration
At surgery
Rate of complications
During surgery up to 14 days post surgery
Surgeon's rating of handling
Immediately after surgery
Surgeon's satisfaction
Immediately after surgery
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONLLETZ (without intraoperative Lugol's iodine)
Iodine group
EXPERIMENTALLLETZ after the intraoperative application of Lugol's iodine
Interventions
Intraoperative application of Lugol's iodine (i.e. staining of the cervix with Lugol's iodine solution)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written consent
- Colposcopy performed preoperatively
- Histologically (by previously performed colposcopy) confirmed dysplasia (CIN 1, CIN 2 or CIN 3)
- Age \>18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant patients
- Patients with insufficient knowledge of the German language
- Treatments already performed on the cervix uteri, in particular conization
- Blood coagulation disorders
- Taking blood thinning substances
- Iodine allergy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Marien Hospital Herne
Herne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44625, Germany
Related Publications (13)
Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, Johnston CM, Muzny CA, Park I, Reno H, Zenilman JM, Bolan GA. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021 Jul 23;70(4):1-187. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1.
PMID: 34292926BACKGROUNDChesson HW, Dunne EF, Hariri S, Markowitz LE. The estimated lifetime probability of acquiring human papillomavirus in the United States. Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Nov;41(11):660-4. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000193.
PMID: 25299412BACKGROUNDBray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
PMID: 30207593BACKGROUNDMathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, Dargent D. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Feb 10;106(2):214-8. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00245-2.
PMID: 12551795BACKGROUNDBevis KS, Biggio JR. Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;205(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
PMID: 21345402BACKGROUNDJin G, LanLan Z, Li C, Dan Z. Pregnancy outcome following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jan;289(1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2955-0. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
PMID: 23843155BACKGROUNDKhalid S, Dimitriou E, Conroy R, Paraskevaidis E, Kyrgiou M, Harrity C, Arbyn M, Prendiville W. The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity. BJOG. 2012 May;119(6):685-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03252.x. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
PMID: 22329499BACKGROUNDShaco-Levy R, Eger G, Dreiher J, Benharroch D, Meirovitz M. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2014 Jan;33(1):83-8. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3182763158.
PMID: 24300540BACKGROUNDPreaubert L, Gondry J, Mancini J, Chevreau J, Lamblin G, Atallah A, Lavoue V, Caradec C, Baldauf JJ, Bryand A, Henno S, Villeret J, Agostini A, Douvier S, Jarniat A, Riethmuller D, Mendel A, Brun JL, Rakotomahenina H, Carcopino X. Benefits of Direct Colposcopic Vision for Optimal LLETZ Procedure: A Prospective Multicenter Study. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016 Jan;20(1):15-21. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000156.
PMID: 26704328BACKGROUNDKuhn W. [Colposcopy in the diagnosis of early cervical cancer]. Pathologe. 2011 Nov;32(6):497-504. doi: 10.1007/s00292-011-1480-9. German.
PMID: 21984389BACKGROUNDHilal Z, Rezniczek GA, Alici F, Kumpernatz A, Dogan A, Alieva L, Tempfer CB. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure with or without intraoperative colposcopy: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;219(4):377.e1-377.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
PMID: 30063903BACKGROUNDRezniczek GA, Hecken JM, Rehman S, Dogan A, Tempfer CB, Hilal Z. Syringe or mask? Loop electrosurgical excision procedure under local or general anesthesia: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):888.e1-888.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.041. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
PMID: 32585223BACKGROUNDHilal Z, Rezniczek GA, El-Fizazi N, Tempfer CB. Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone Versus True Cone Biopsy Electrode Excision: A Randomized Trial. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Oct;21(4):272-278. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000329.
PMID: 28953118BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Clemens B Tempfer, MD, MBA
Ruhr-Universität Bochum / Marien Hospital Herne
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants are not aware of their treatment allocation in order not to influence patient reported outcomes
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologiy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2021
First Posted
November 24, 2021
Study Start
January 17, 2022
Primary Completion
September 25, 2025
Study Completion
October 16, 2025
Last Updated
April 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- After publication of the study results, no time limit.
- Access Criteria
- Reasonable request, approval of the intended study by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.
Data will be shared upon reasonable request made to the corresponding author. This includes individual participant data underlying the results presented here, after deidentification, as well as data dictionaries and the the study protocol. Data is available after publication, without a specific end date. Requesting investigators must show that their proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.