NCT05132114

Brief Summary

Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women and one of the leading causes of death in women worldwide. Pre-cancerous lesions (dysplasias) are detected by the gynecologist's preventive smear test and can thus contribute to a 100% chance of cure if they are clarified by a colposcopic examination as part of the dysplasia consultation and, if necessary, surgically removed. Conization (= surgical removal of a cone of tissue from the cervix) is the method of choice for removing the diseased tissue. LLETZ conization (Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone) is the worldwide standard surgical procedure for conization. There is risk of local persistence of the precancerous lesion if the cervical dysplasia is not completely removed. To minimize this, the iodine test can be used. Here, a 5% iodine solution (so-called Lugol's solution) is dabbed onto the cervix uteri, resulting in an intense and characteristic brown staining of the healthy cervical epithelium. Sites without staining are termed iodine negative and may contain dysplastic cells. The strength of iodine testing lies in its high specificity, i.e., the reliable ability to exclude false-positive results. The purpose of intraoperative iodine staining is to select the resection line with a high degree of certainty in healthy (i.e., iodine-positive) tissue in order to reduce the rate of cervical dysplasia that is not completely removed (so-called non-in-sano resection, or R1 resection). Systematic survey data from the dysplasia units certified in Germany on the question of the use of intraoperative iodine testing in Germany are lacking, as is the literature as a whole. For example, the current S3 guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics on the diagnosis and treatment of cervical dysplasia (as of March 2020) names intraoperative iodine testing only as a possible option for performing LLETZ. In this prospective, randomized study, the investigators aim to answer the question whether LLETZ performed with the help of an iodine test with selection of the resection line in the iodine-positive area leads to a lower rate of R1 resections compared to the standard LLETZ without iodine test.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
230

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 11, 2021

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 24, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 17, 2022

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 25, 2025

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 16, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 14, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

November 11, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

cervical dyslasiaLLETZLEEPLugol's iodineconization

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of R1 resections

    The primary outcome parameter is the rate of R1 resections, defined as the presence of a CIN I, CIN II, or CIN III at the ectocervical and/or endocervical resection margin, as indicated in the histopathologic report.

    Specimen from surgery (result expected 1-2 days after surgery)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Cone mass

    During surgery, immediately after the excision

  • Procedure duration

    At surgery

  • Rate of complications

    During surgery up to 14 days post surgery

  • Surgeon's rating of handling

    Immediately after surgery

  • Surgeon's satisfaction

    Immediately after surgery

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

LLETZ (without intraoperative Lugol's iodine)

Iodine group

EXPERIMENTAL

LLETZ after the intraoperative application of Lugol's iodine

Diagnostic Test: Lugol's iodine test

Interventions

Lugol's iodine testDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Intraoperative application of Lugol's iodine (i.e. staining of the cervix with Lugol's iodine solution)

Iodine group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Written consent
  • Colposcopy performed preoperatively
  • Histologically (by previously performed colposcopy) confirmed dysplasia (CIN 1, CIN 2 or CIN 3)
  • Age \>18 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients with insufficient knowledge of the German language
  • Treatments already performed on the cervix uteri, in particular conization
  • Blood coagulation disorders
  • Taking blood thinning substances
  • Iodine allergy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Marien Hospital Herne

Herne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44625, Germany

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, Johnston CM, Muzny CA, Park I, Reno H, Zenilman JM, Bolan GA. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021 Jul 23;70(4):1-187. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1.

    PMID: 34292926BACKGROUND
  • Chesson HW, Dunne EF, Hariri S, Markowitz LE. The estimated lifetime probability of acquiring human papillomavirus in the United States. Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Nov;41(11):660-4. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000193.

    PMID: 25299412BACKGROUND
  • Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

    PMID: 30207593BACKGROUND
  • Mathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, Dargent D. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Feb 10;106(2):214-8. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00245-2.

    PMID: 12551795BACKGROUND
  • Bevis KS, Biggio JR. Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;205(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Feb 23.

    PMID: 21345402BACKGROUND
  • Jin G, LanLan Z, Li C, Dan Z. Pregnancy outcome following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jan;289(1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2955-0. Epub 2013 Jul 11.

    PMID: 23843155BACKGROUND
  • Khalid S, Dimitriou E, Conroy R, Paraskevaidis E, Kyrgiou M, Harrity C, Arbyn M, Prendiville W. The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity. BJOG. 2012 May;119(6):685-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03252.x. Epub 2012 Feb 14.

    PMID: 22329499BACKGROUND
  • Shaco-Levy R, Eger G, Dreiher J, Benharroch D, Meirovitz M. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2014 Jan;33(1):83-8. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3182763158.

    PMID: 24300540BACKGROUND
  • Preaubert L, Gondry J, Mancini J, Chevreau J, Lamblin G, Atallah A, Lavoue V, Caradec C, Baldauf JJ, Bryand A, Henno S, Villeret J, Agostini A, Douvier S, Jarniat A, Riethmuller D, Mendel A, Brun JL, Rakotomahenina H, Carcopino X. Benefits of Direct Colposcopic Vision for Optimal LLETZ Procedure: A Prospective Multicenter Study. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016 Jan;20(1):15-21. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000156.

    PMID: 26704328BACKGROUND
  • Kuhn W. [Colposcopy in the diagnosis of early cervical cancer]. Pathologe. 2011 Nov;32(6):497-504. doi: 10.1007/s00292-011-1480-9. German.

    PMID: 21984389BACKGROUND
  • Hilal Z, Rezniczek GA, Alici F, Kumpernatz A, Dogan A, Alieva L, Tempfer CB. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure with or without intraoperative colposcopy: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;219(4):377.e1-377.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Jul 29.

    PMID: 30063903BACKGROUND
  • Rezniczek GA, Hecken JM, Rehman S, Dogan A, Tempfer CB, Hilal Z. Syringe or mask? Loop electrosurgical excision procedure under local or general anesthesia: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):888.e1-888.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.041. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

    PMID: 32585223BACKGROUND
  • Hilal Z, Rezniczek GA, El-Fizazi N, Tempfer CB. Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone Versus True Cone Biopsy Electrode Excision: A Randomized Trial. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Oct;21(4):272-278. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000329.

    PMID: 28953118BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Precancerous ConditionsNeoplasmsUterine Cervical DiseasesUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Clemens B Tempfer, MD, MBA

    Ruhr-Universität Bochum / Marien Hospital Herne

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants are not aware of their treatment allocation in order not to influence patient reported outcomes
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective randomized trial with 2 groups (use vs not use of Lugol's iodine during LLETZ)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologiy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2021

First Posted

November 24, 2021

Study Start

January 17, 2022

Primary Completion

September 25, 2025

Study Completion

October 16, 2025

Last Updated

April 14, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data will be shared upon reasonable request made to the corresponding author. This includes individual participant data underlying the results presented here, after deidentification, as well as data dictionaries and the the study protocol. Data is available after publication, without a specific end date. Requesting investigators must show that their proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
After publication of the study results, no time limit.
Access Criteria
Reasonable request, approval of the intended study by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.

Locations