Comparison of The Acute Effects of Different Stretching Methods on Ankle Joint Range In Healty Older Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Introduction: To compare the acute effects of different stretching methods on ankle joint range of motion (ROM) in older adults. Methods: A total of 78 subjects aged 65 years and older were randomly divided into three groups. After the 5-minute walk, the randomly assigned method was applied. Static Stretching Group; static stretching in 3x30sec, PNF Stretching Group; PNF contract-relax in 3x30sec and Roller Massage Group; roller massage in 3x30sec was performed. Immediately after the application, 10 minutes and 20 minutes after application, the range of motion of the ankle joint was measured in the weight-bearing lunge position.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 23, 2021
CompletedNovember 23, 2021
November 1, 2021
5 months
November 8, 2021
November 18, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Range of motion
The ankle ROM measurement made in the standing load-bearing position and the measurement made in the weight-bearing position.
Baseline
Range of motion
The ankle ROM measurement made in the standing load-bearing position and the measurement made in the weight-bearing position.
Immediately after application
Range of motion
The ankle ROM measurement made in the standing load-bearing position and the measurement made in the weight-bearing position.
10 minutes after application
Range of motion
The ankle ROM measurement made in the standing load-bearing position and the measurement made in the weight-bearing position.
20 minutes after application
Study Arms (3)
Static Stretching Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe static stretching method was actively applied while standing.The person was positioned facing the wall, supporting the wall with both hands, with the dominant foot behind. The point where a feeling of tension in the plantar flexor muscles was created and held in this position for 30 seconds. Afterward, a 15-second rest break was given. After completing 3 repetitions (3x30sec) in total, measurements were started.
PNF Stretching Method Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe person was positioned supine, and the ankle joint was dorsiflexed by the physiotherapist to the point where the tension was felt. Then, while the person was trying to push the foot towards the plantarflexion direction for 10 seconds, the movement was prevented by the physiotherapist and isometric contraction was achieved at 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction. After 10 seconds, the person was asked to relax slowly and passive stretching was applied to the plantar flexors for 20 seconds. The contract-relax technique was applied for 30 seconds and completed with 3 repetitions (3x30sec) with 15-second rest intervals.
Myofascial Relaxation Method Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORA comfortable position was achieved by placing a rolled towel on the front of the ankle. The roller was massaged along with the plantar flexors for 30 seconds. The movement of the cylinder from bottom to top and from top to bottom was done for a second. Three repetitions were completed (3x30sec) with a 15-second rest break. For the pressure of the roller to be stable during the application, the numbered pain scale was shown to the participants, and attention was paid to ensure that the perceived severity was 7/10 according to the numbered pain scale. Participants with dry skin in the application area were asked to moisturize with cream beforehand to avoid complications.
Interventions
Static stretching has been the most common stretching method applied to the ankle in healthy older adults, and different protocols have proven to increase ankle range of motion. In this study, the static stretching method was actively applied while standing.
The contract-relax technique was used in the PNF stretching method.
A theraband roller massager (Theraband®, The Hygenic Corporation, Akron, OH) was used for the myofascial relaxation method.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy and voluntary older adults aged 65 and over
- Who were able to walk without using an assistive device,
- Independent in their daily life activities
- Who scored 23 and above according to the mini-mental state test.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of a neurological, orthopedic or cardiovascular disease affecting the lower extremity,
- Pain or limitation of movement in the ankle joint,
- Skin diseases,
- History of falling in the last 1 year,
- Any problem that may prevent lying prone
- participation in a regular exercise program.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hacettepe Universitylead
- Nursen İlçincollaborator
- Ceren Devrim Şahincollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Izmir Provincial Health Directorate State Hospital
Izmir, Urla, Turkey (Türkiye)
Izmir Provincial Health Directorate Urla State Hospital
Izmir, Urla, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ceren Devrim Şahin, MSc
Dokuz Eylul University
- STUDY CHAIR
Nursen İlçin, Assoc. prof.
Dokuz Eylul University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kutay Kaşlı, MSc
Çankırı Karatekin University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A single-blind, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Kutay Kaşlı
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2021
First Posted
November 23, 2021
Study Start
October 1, 2017
Primary Completion
February 27, 2018
Study Completion
February 27, 2018
Last Updated
November 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11