Single Session of Anodal Cerebellar vs Cerebral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke Patients
Effects of a Single Session of Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Anodal Cerebral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Balance, Mobility and Cognition in Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare the effect of anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) vs anodal cerebral direct current stimulation on balance, mobility and cognition in stroke patients in stroke patients
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Oct 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2022
CompletedAugust 3, 2023
August 1, 2023
12 months
September 23, 2021
August 1, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Changes from the base line, Berg balance scale
Changes from the base line, Immediately after Intervention and then again after 1 hour. The Berg balance scale (BBS) is used to assess the participant's ability to retain stability. The BBS is a widely used test for the assessment of elderly population with impairment of balance and individuals with neurological disorder while sitting, standing, and transferring. This test included both static and dynamic type task. The BBS uses a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 (disability) to 4(complete independent performance) and consists of 14 components; the maximum score is 56 points. The scale has been shown to be reliable and valid in stroke patients. A cut-off score of 45 points is used for fall prediction. The BBS involves 14 tasks; a total score of 56. Equipment required for this test were a stop watch or watch with a second's hand and a ruler or other indicator of 2, 5, and 10 inches.
Immediately after Intervention and then again after 1 hour.
Timed Up and Go test
Changes from the base line, Immediately after Intervention and then again after 1 hour. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test was designed for the evaluation of balance and Measures mobility in people who are able to walk on their own (assistive device permitted) to find out the risk of fall . The subjects will be required to stand up from a chair, walk 3 m, turn around, return to the chair, and sit down. The time taken to complete this task will be measured. The test will be informed three times. The time required to complete this task will be measured from a stopwatch. The average values from 3 trials, with 1-min rest between each trial, were used for data analysis.
Immediately after Intervention and then again after 1 hour.
Balance Evaluation Systems Test
Changes from the base line, Immediately after Intervention and then again after 1 hour.. Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a 36-item assessment of balance impairments across 6 postural control contexts. Total score of 108 points total, calculated in to a percentage score (0-100%). Also total sub-scores exist for each above listed system. Item-level scores range from 0 (severe impairment) to 3 (no impairment)
Immediately after Intervention and then again after 1 hour.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Montreal cognitive Scale
1 hour
tDCS Adverse Effects Questionnaire :
Immediately after Intervention and then again after 1 hour.
6 min walk test: Distance (meters)
Immediately after Intervention and then again after 1 hour.
Timed 25-Foot Walk test
Immediately after Intervention and then again after 1 hour.
Johns Hopkins fall risk assessment Tool
Immediately after Intervention and then again after 1 hour.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Anodal tDCS cerebellar stimulation group:
EXPERIMENTALAnodal tDCS cerebellar stimulation
Anodal tDCS cerebral (M1) stimulation group:
EXPERIMENTALAnodal tDCS cerebral (M1) stimulation
Sham Group
SHAM COMPARATORSham: Single-session a-tDCS (2 mA, 20 min),
Interventions
Single-session atDCS (2 mA, 20 min). The active (anode) and the returning (cathode) electrodes will be placed bilaterally over the cerebellum (1 -2 cm below inion of occipital bone) and the right buccinator muscle, respectively Xbox kinect based balance and mobility training using games from Xbox Adventure Pack for 50 mins will also be given
single session a-tDCS (2 mA, 20 min), the anode will be positioned over the lesioned M1 (C3, International 10-20 system) and the cathode would be located over the supraorbital area. xbox kinect based balance and mobility training using games from Xbox Adventure Pack for 50 mins.
single session a-tDCS (2 mA, 20 min), Sham tDCS followed a similar protocol as Anodal tDCS cerebral (M1) stimulation and arrangement but stimulation for 30 s, after which the current was ramped-down and turned off for the rest of the treatment. xbox kinect based balance and mobility training using games from Xbox Adventure Pack for 50 mins.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ability to give written consent.
- Able to walk unassisted
- Functional status allowing the participants to participate in the balance training.
- Score 6 or above on Johns Hopkins fall risk assessment tool
You may not qualify if:
- Neurological diseases, such as Parkinson, Alzheimer
- Any history of psychological illnesses
- Receipt of electrotherapy that might affect the nervous system in the two weeks prior to the study
- Cerebellar disorders
- use of any sedative medicines in the two days prior to the study
- any symptoms of amnesia and depression;
- Memory disorders with scores below 21 on the Mini Mental Status Examination test
- Any signs of severe motor disorders in the lower extremity which cause any movement limitation or deformity
- Any signs of radiculopathy or root lumbar spinal cord involvement
- Any visual or auditory impairment, or vertigo reports
- Use of a heart rate regulator
- Any structural deformities in the lower extremities or the spine
- Any abnormalities in the vestibular system
- History of recent fracture
- Inability to move without assistance
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Akbar Hospital, Gujrat
Dhok Gujra, Punjab Province, 50010, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arshad Nawaz Malik, PhD
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2021
First Posted
November 22, 2021
Study Start
October 5, 2021
Primary Completion
September 30, 2022
Study Completion
September 30, 2022
Last Updated
August 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share