Transforaminal Epidural Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Epidural Steroid Injection for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Lumbosacral radicular pain is present in around 40% of cases of low back pain. It is usually caused by irritation and inflammation of the nerve root, and patients typically experience pain radiating from the back to the lower limb in the distribution of the affected spinal nerves. Epidural steroid injection is the most commonly used pain-relieving procedure in the world. However, the analgesic efficacy of epidural steroid injection appears to be modest and duration limited. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is an emerging treatment option for chronic pain. It is currently used for treating musculoskeletal pain conditions such as osteoarthritis and tendinopathies. While epidural steroids reduce pain by reducing inflammation, PRP promotes the healing of nerve injury and reduces neuropathic pain. However, the effect of transforaminal epidural PRP versus epidural steroid specifically for lumbosacral radicular pain is unclear. In this study, a double blind, randomized controlled trial will be performed to compare the effect of transforaminal epidural PRP versus epidural steroid for pain relief in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 chronic-pain
Started Mar 2021
Typical duration for phase_4 chronic-pain
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedMay 10, 2023
May 1, 2023
3 years
November 1, 2021
May 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Score at rest
Pain at rest assessed by numerical rating scales (NRS) from 0 to 10, where 0 = the least pain and 10 = the worst pain.
at postoperative day 1
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain Score at movement
at postoperative day 1
Study Arms (2)
Group ESI
EXPERIMENTALPatients in group ESI will undergo epidural steroid injection.
Group EPRP
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in group EPRP will undergo epidural PRP injection.
Interventions
For the transforaminal epidural injection, a 22-gauge spinal needle will be inserted coaxially via a subpedicular approach to target the upper part of the foramen under fluoroscopic guidance. Correct needle position will be confirmed with appropriate contrast spread (1ml of contrast) in the anteroposterior, oblique, and lateral view. Spread of contrast delineating the nerve root together with proximal epidural spread will be accepted as indicating correct needle position. A single level injection will be performed because there are no clinical trials showing that multilevel injections is superior to single level injection, and a well-positioned injection usually spreads to multiple levels, thus achieving the effect of multi-level injection. 2ml of 1% lignocaine will be given for skin infiltration. Once correct position is confirmed, drug injectate will be administered. For the ESI group, 8mg of dexamethasone (4mg/ml) added to 1 ml of normal saline will be given (total 3ml volume).
For the transforaminal epidural injection, a 22-gauge spinal needle will be inserted coaxially via a subpedicular approach to target the upper part of the foramen under fluoroscopic guidance. Correct needle position will be confirmed with appropriate contrast spread (1ml of contrast) in the anteroposterior, oblique, and lateral view. Spread of contrast delineating the nerve root together with proximal epidural spread will be accepted as indicating correct needle position. A single level injection will be performed because there are no clinical trials showing that multilevel injections is superior to single level injection, and a well-positioned injection usually spreads to multiple levels, thus achieving the effect of multi-level injection. 2ml of 1% lignocaine will be given for skin infiltration. Once correct position is confirmed, drug injectate will be administered. For the EPRP group, 3 ml of PRP will be injected. The total volume of injectate for both groups of patients is 3ml.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or above
- average radicular leg pain of ≥ 4 (numerical rating scale (NRS) 0-10) over the past week,
- Unilateral radicular leg pain
- symptoms and/or signs of lumbosacral radicular pain (such as lower leg pain or back/buttock pain radiating to lower limb or positive straight leg raising or lower limb numbness or altered lower limb sensation)
- pain duration more than 6 weeks
- Imaging findings (magnetic resonance imaging) of a pathologic condition correlating with symptoms or signs (herniated disc or annular tear or spinal stenosis)
- able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- patients require surgical intervention
- coagulopathy (platelet count less than 100,000/ml, international normalized ratio \[INR\] over 1.5).
- Using anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet medication (not including aspirin)
- received epidural steroid injection within the past 1 year
- systemic infection
- previous lumbar spine surgery
- allergy: contrast dye, steroids, PRP, local anaesthetic
- pregnancy
- physically unable to tolerate epidural injection
- uncontrolled psychiatric disorder (Beck depression score ≥ 21)
- active or a history of substance use disorder (including alcohol, opioid)
- known secondary gain (eg active litigation)
- patients with predominantly neurogenic claudication (pain over the calves, buttock, and/or thigh triggered by walking and/or prolonged standing in upright position).
- back pain greater than leg pain
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stanley SC Wong, MBBS
The University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 2021
First Posted
November 22, 2021
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
March 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05