NCT05128708

Brief Summary

Right sided hemicolectomy is the standard type of operation for cancers in the caecum, the ascending colon, proximal transverse colon.The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of combined medial and caudal approach in performing right hemicolectomy and to compare outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery in right colon cancer.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 7, 2020

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 28, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 4, 2021

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 22, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

November 22, 2021

Status Verified

November 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 4, 2021

Last Update Submit

November 16, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

right colonmedial and caudal approachhemicolectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • calculate the duration of operation in both groups

    The duration of operation was calculated in minutes in both groups. group I: open combined medial and caudal right hemicolectomy and group II: laparoscopic combined medial and caudal right hemicolectomy from skin incision till skin closure intraoperatively.

    The duration of operation was calculated intra operatively from skin incision to skin closure. it was ranging from 2 to 4 hours after skin incision.

  • Detection of the amount of blood loss during operation in both groups.

    the amount of blood loss during operation is calculated in cubic centimetres using scaled container connected to suction device in both groups.

    the amount of blood loss was detected intra operatively for 4 hours after skin incision.

  • Detection of organ or visceral injury in both groups

    detection of organ or visceral injury was done intra operatively by naked eye in both groups.

    detection of organ injury was detected intra operatively for 4 hours after skin incision.

  • detection of the duration of hospital stay in both groups

    the duration of hospital stay was detected in days in both groups

    duration of hospital stay was detected from the day of operation till the day of discharge (4 to 7 days postoperatively)

  • detection of number of resected lymph nodes in both groups

    the number of resected lymph nodes was detected in post operative histopathological reports in both groups.

    number of resected lymph nodes was detected from 7th to 10th day post operatively

  • detection of occurrence of postoperative pain in both groups

    detection of post operative pain was detected in both groups using a written scale fulfilled by the participant giving a score from 1 out of 10 points (1 to 3 points referred as minimal) (4 to 6 points referred as mild) (7 to 10 points referred as sever).

    detection of post operative pain in both groups was done from the day of operation to 7 days postoperatively.

  • detection of occurrence fecal fistula in both groups

    occurrence of fecal fistula in both groups was detected by vision of fecal discharge in drains from 48 hours post operatively till discharge day.

    detection of occurrence of fecal fistula in both groups was detected from 2 to 7 days postoperatively

  • detection of post operative wound infection in both groups

    post operative wound infection in both groups was detected by vision of wound discharge or pus.

    post operative wound infection in both groups was detected from 2 days to one month post operatively.

Study Arms (2)

open right hemicolectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

participants diagnosed as operable right sided colon cancer were enrolled in this study and did open combined medial and caudal resection procedure

Procedure: combined medial and caudal approach right hemicolectomy open and laparoscopic

laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

participants diagnosed as operable right sided colon cancer were enrolled in this study and did laparoscopic combined medial and caudal resection procedure

Procedure: combined medial and caudal approach right hemicolectomy open and laparoscopic

Interventions

resection of right colon cancer by this radical approach

laparoscopic right hemicolectomyopen right hemicolectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosed right colon cancer with colonoscopic biopsy.
  • No invasion of the surrounding tissue.
  • No distant metastasis except the liver.

You may not qualify if:

  • Informed consent refusal
  • Malignancy recurrence
  • Distant metastasis except the liver.
  • Locally advanced tumor.
  • participants need emergent intervention e.g., intestinal obstruction or perforation.
  • Contraindications specific for laparoscopy for laparoscopy cases

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zagazig University Hospitals

Zagazig, 44519, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Troisi RJ, Freedman AN, Devesa SS. Incidence of colorectal carcinoma in the U.S.: an update of trends by gender, race, age, subsite, and stage, 1975-1994. Cancer. 1999 Apr 15;85(8):1670-6.

    PMID: 10223559BACKGROUND
  • Gouvas N, Agalianos C, Papaparaskeva K, Perrakis A, Hohenberger W, Xynos E. Surgery along the embryological planes for colon cancer: a systematic review of complete mesocolic excision. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Sep;31(9):1577-94. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2626-2. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

    PMID: 27469525BACKGROUND
  • Jessup JM, McGinnis LS, Steele GD Jr, Menck HR, Winchester DP. The National Cancer Data Base. Report on colon cancer. Cancer. 1996 Aug 15;78(4):918-26. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960815)78:43.0.CO;2-W.

    PMID: 8756390BACKGROUND
  • Chen Q, Shuai X, Chen L. [Safety and feasibility of the combined medial and caudal approach in laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesocolic excision for right hemicolectomy in the treatment of right hemicolon cancer complicated with incomplete ileus]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 25;21(9):1039-1044. Chinese.

    PMID: 30269325BACKGROUND
  • Li F, Zhou X, Wang B, Guo L, Wang J, Wang W, Fu W. Comparison between different approaches applied in laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017 Dec;48:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.029. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

    PMID: 29032159BACKGROUND
  • Xie D, Yu C, Gao C, Osaiweran H, Hu J, Gong J. An Optimal Approach for Laparoscopic D3 Lymphadenectomy Plus Complete Mesocolic Excision (D3+CME) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 May;24(5):1312-1313. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5722-1. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

    PMID: 27995452BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic Neoplasms

Interventions

Laparoscopy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Reham Z Mohamed, master

    assistant lecturer of general surgery zagazig university

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Ali H Elshewy, PhD

    professor of general surgery zagazig university

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Abdelrahman A Sarhan, PhD

    professor of general surgery zagazig university

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Gamal M Osman, PhD

    assistant professor of general surgery zagazig university

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: all participants underwent right hemicolectomy using combined medial and caudal approach and divided into 2 groups group I had open surgery and group II had laparoscopic surgery
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
assistant lecturer of general surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2021

First Posted

November 22, 2021

Study Start

August 7, 2020

Primary Completion

August 28, 2021

Study Completion

October 1, 2021

Last Updated

November 22, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

researchers should contact the principle investigator for individual participant data

Locations