Ephedrine Versus Ondansetron During Cesarean Delivery
Ephedrine Versus Ondansetron in the Prevention of Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery: a Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
168
1 country
1
Brief Summary
More than 30% of the patients receiving spinal anesthesia develop hypotension. Hypotension developed during cesarean section (C/S) under spinal anesthesia may jeopardize uteroplacental circulation leading to fetal compromise and even fetal death. The effect of prophylactic ondansetron on blood pressure after spinal anesthesia has not been compared in a clinical trial with that of a vasoconstrictor. The investigators will compare ephedrine and ondansetron for the prevention of maternal hypotension after spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2022
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 9, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 10, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 6, 2022
CompletedSeptember 9, 2022
September 1, 2022
2 months
November 9, 2021
September 7, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Maternal hypotension
Mean arterial blood pressure was recorded every 2 minute for 10 minutes then every 5 minutes until delivery. Time of intrathecal injection was considered as 0 min.
45 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Apgar score
5 min after fetal delivery
Study Arms (4)
Group E
EXPERIMENTALMonitoring with pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure measurement and electrocardiogram was established on arrival to the operating room Group E: were administered intravenous ephedrine 10 mg diluted in 10 mL 0.9% saline over 1 minute; Then under aseptic precautions, spinal anesthesia was administered.
Group OL
EXPERIMENTALMonitoring with pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure measurement and electrocardiogram was established on arrival to the operating room Group OL: were administered intravenous ondansetron 4 mg diluted in 10 mL 0.9% saline over 1 minute; Then under aseptic precautions, spinal anesthesia was administered.
Group OH
EXPERIMENTALMonitoring with pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure measurement and electrocardiogram was established on arrival to the operating room Group OH: were administered intravenous ondansetron 8 mg diluted in 10 mL 0.9% saline over 1 minute; Then under aseptic precautions, spinal anesthesia was administered.
Group P
PLACEBO COMPARATORMonitoring with pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure measurement and electrocardiogram was established on arrival to the operating room Group P: was a control group who received 0.9% saline 10 mL over 1 minute as a placebo. Then under aseptic precautions, spinal anesthesia was administered.
Interventions
Ondansetron 4mg was given over 1 min, 5 min before spinal anesthesia
Ondansetron 8mg was given over 1 min, 5 min before spinal anesthesia
Ephedrine 10mg was given over 1 min, 5 min before spinal anesthesia
10 mL normal salinwe 0.9% was given over 1 min, 5 min before spinal anesthesia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age \>18, \<40 years;
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II;
- term pregnancy
- singleton pregnancy;
- elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a history of diabetes mellitus other than gestational diabetes,
- hypertension,
- body mass index \>40 kg/m2,
- complicated pregnancy, allergy to study drugs,
- long QT syndrome,
- Contraindication to spinal anesthesia
- Patients who required general anesthesia were withdrawn from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams University Hospitals
Cairo, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This is a double-blind study at the level of patients, careproviders, and outcome assessors. Anesthesiologists, surgeons, and operating personnel did not know which study treatment was used. Syringes were identical in terms of volume, color, viscosity, and odor.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 9, 2021
First Posted
November 19, 2021
Study Start
January 10, 2022
Primary Completion
March 1, 2022
Study Completion
March 6, 2022
Last Updated
September 9, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request