Treatment In Acute Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo
Comparison of the Efficacy of Medical Treatment and Vestibular Rehabilitation In Patients With Acute Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a vestibular disorder that manifests itself as a result of dizziness caused by the otoconia in the inner ear coming out of their places and circulating freely in the semicircular canals or by attaching to the cupula and sensitizing the cupula to head movements against gravity. The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of pharmacological treatment initiated by the physician and vestibular rehabilitation initiated by physiotherapist in patients with acute benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). Thirty patients, aged 18-50 years, who applied to the Bağcılar Safa Hospital, were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups, 15 pharmacological control group and 15 vestibular rehabilitation group. 8 patients in the pharmacological control group were given the drug containing betahistine by the physician, and 7 patients received the drug containing additional dimenhydrinate to the betahistine. In the rehabilitation group, exercises including head and eye movements and maneuvering were performed according to the direction of the canal after the exercise, and the patients were given a home exercise program. Treatment continued for 4 weeks. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), dynamic visual acuity test, romberg, semitandem, tandem posture tests with a stopwatch, standing test on one leg with eyes open and closed, and unterberger tests were applied to patients before and after treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 6, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2021
CompletedDecember 2, 2021
November 1, 2021
5 months
October 6, 2021
November 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Perceptual Dizziness
Perceived dizziness was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The patients stated the severity of their dizziness between 0-10 (0 being the mildest, 10 being unbearable).
Four weeks
Balance
The balance of the patients was evaluated using the tandem, romberg, and one-leg standing test with eyes open and closed using a stopwatch. Individuals were expected to maintain their balance for 30 seconds.
Four weeks
Vestibular Dysfunction
Vestibular Dysfunction was assessed with the Unterberger Test performed with the eyes closed. During the Unterberger test, the patient should marching where they are. If more than 45 degrees of deflection is detected, the test is positive.
Four weeks
Dynamic Visual Acuity
Dynamic visual acuity was evaluated using the Snellen chart. A person taking the test is seated in a chair 2 meters away from the Snellen chart and while the therapist shakes the patient's head from right to left, the patient is asked if he can see the letters of each line, starting from the top. The test is terminated on the line where the letter sequence cannot be seen clearly.
Four weeks
Study Arms (2)
Vestibular Rehabilitation Group
EXPERIMENTALInvestigators applied vestibular rehabilitation in this group. This group was consist of 15 participants. After the evaluation investigators gave the patients repetitive vestibular exercises for 4 weeks and in the first week investigators performed canalith repositioning procedure depending on the affected canal. If affected posterior semicircular canal investigators applied Epley maneuver. If affected horizontal semicircular canal also applied barbeque roll maneuver.
Pharmacological Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONInvestigators did not apply any treatment in this group. Participant in this group just used medications doctor-prescribed.
Interventions
Vestibular Rehabilitation which is consist of repetitive exercises and canalit repositioning maneuvers
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age,
- Positive Dix-Hallpike test result, and
- No spontaneous nystagmus.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with Meniere's disease, vestibular neuritis, labyrinthitis, sudden sensory hearing loss, chronic otitis media, non-ambulatory patients, patients with vertigo due to central causes, and patients with cardiac complaints were excluded from the study.
- In addition, patients with conditions contraindicated for canalith repositioning procedures (such as cervical spine stenosis, severe kyphoscoliosis, cervical radiculopathy, ankylosing spondylitis, severe lumbar dysfunction, and spinal injuries) were excluded from the vestibular rehabilitation group.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Safa Hospital
Istanbul, Bagcilar, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physiotherapist MSc, Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2021
First Posted
November 19, 2021
Study Start
July 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 8, 2019
Study Completion
April 16, 2020
Last Updated
December 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share