Evaluation of Chest Wall Motility After MIRPE
Chest Wall Motility in Pectus Excavatum Patients Before and After MIRPE Performed With One or Two Metallic Bars: a Comparative Study
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common congenital deformity of the chest wall and surgical treatment using the minimally invasive technique (MIRPE) is consolidating as the choice to perform PE correction. In this technique, a temporary metal bar is placed in a retrosternal position, pushing the sternum without the need for cartilage resection. Despite the advantages obtained, it is not free from complications, with the displacement of the bar being one of the main problems. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate a new bridging device for the set of two metal bars to be used in the surgical treatment of PE, verifying the clinical and surgical complications and evaluating the change in lung volumes and thoracoabdominal kinematics using optoelectronic plethysmography , preoperatively and 180 days after MIRPE; and also evaluating diaphragmatic mobility via ultrasound examination to assess the craniocaudal displacement of the left branch of the vein preoperatively and 180 days later. There will be 20 participants, who after performing a computed tomography of the chest to obtain the Haller index, clinical and laboratory tests, electrocardiogram and echocardiogram. Participants will be randomized and divided into two groups: 10 control individuals (traditional MIRPE technique used in the Service) and 10 intervention individuals (with bridge fixators developed in partnership with Traumec Tecnologia e Implantes, Brazil). The effectiveness of the fixators will be evaluated by the degree of displacement of the bars, using a mathematical formula, using a lateral chest X-ray in the immediate postoperative period (d0) and another image from the end of the period analyzed (dX), 15, 30, 90 and 180 days after the surgical procedure; evaluation of postoperative pain through the numerical pain scale; use of validated questionnaires on quality of life (physical and mental health) using two instruments, SF-36 and PEEQ. All data obtained between the two groups will be submitted to descriptive and inferential statistics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedNovember 18, 2021
November 1, 2021
1.1 years
October 5, 2021
November 5, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Thoracoabdominal kinematics and lung volumes
Measurement of lung volumes in liters (L) will be obtained indirectly through optoelectronic plethysmography.
Change from baseline to 180 days
Metallic bars displacement
The displacement of the bars measured in millimeters (mm) in the lateral chest X-ray in the immediate postoperative (d0) and at the end of the period analyzed (dX) considering the distance between the upper point of contact of the bar with the sternum and the most posterior and superior point of the body of the sternum. The bar displacement index is calculated according to the formula: d0 - dX / d0 x 100.
Change from baseline to 180 days.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Diaphragmatic mobility
Pre op and 180 days
Pain intensity
Change from baseline to 180 days
Quality of life related to physical and mental health
Preoperative period and 180 days
Physical and psychosocial quality-of-life changes after surgical repair of pectus excavatum
Preoperative period and 180 days
Study Arms (2)
One bar
ACTIVE COMPARATORMIRPE utilizing just one metallic bar
Two bars
ACTIVE COMPARATORMIRPE utilizing two metallic bars fixed with the bridge device
Interventions
Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum utilizing two metallic bars
Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum utilizing one metallic bar
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants over 12 years of age;
- Pectus excavatum;
- Haller index \> 3.25
You may not qualify if:
- Associated congenital anomalies;
- Unable to answer the quality of life questionnaires;
- Congenital heart disease;
- Chronic immunosuppression.
- Previous chest surgery or pleural drainage
- Associated coagulopathies and/or use of anticoagulant medications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Sao Paulolead
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruzcollaborator
- Traumec Tecnologia e Implantes Ortopedicos Ltdacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Heart Institute (InCor) Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Related Publications (6)
de Carvalho RLC, Tedde ML, de Campos JRM, Hamilton NN, Guilherme GF, Sousa VM, Junior VFS, Savazzi FH, Pego-Fernandes PM. Quality of life outcomes after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum utilizing a new set of metallic bars and stabilizers. J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Mar;56(3):545-549. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.06.036. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
PMID: 32711943BACKGROUNDTedde ML, Togoro SY, Eisinger RS, Okumura EM, Fernandes A, Pego-Fernandes PM, Campos JRM. Back to the future: a case series of minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum with regular instruments. J Bras Pneumol. 2019 Feb 11;45(1):e20170373. doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20170373.
PMID: 30758428BACKGROUNDTogoro SY, Tedde ML, Eisinger RS, Okumura EM, de Campos JRM, Pego-Fernandes PM. The Vacuum Bell device as a sternal lifter: An immediate effect even with a short time use. J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Mar;53(3):406-410. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 May 1.
PMID: 28495420BACKGROUNDde Campos JR, Tedde ML. Management of deep pectus excavatum (DPE). Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Sep;5(5):476-484. doi: 10.21037/acs.2016.09.02.
PMID: 27747181BACKGROUNDTedde ML, de Campos JR, Wihlm JM, Jatene FB. The Nuss procedure made safer: an effective and simple sternal elevation manoeuvre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Nov;42(5):890-1. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs442. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
PMID: 22833539BACKGROUNDTedde ML, Campos JR, Das-Neves-Pereira JC, Abrao FC, Jatene FB. The search for stability: bar displacement in three series of pectus excavatum patients treated with the Nuss technique. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(10):1743-6. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011001000012.
PMID: 22012046BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Miguel L Tedde, MD, PhD
Heart Institute (InCor) FMUSP
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Paulo M Pego-Fernandes, MD, PhD
Heart Institute (InCor) FMUSP
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2021
First Posted
November 18, 2021
Study Start
October 1, 2021
Primary Completion
October 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
November 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share