Feasibility and Acceptability of an Web-based Physical Activity Program, for Those Diagnosed With Lung Cancer.
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Lung cancer is a life changing disease which can cause negative effects on an individual's ability to perform daily tasks and their quality of life (QoL). Lung cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK and is estimated affects approximately 33,000 individuals per year. The most common side effects from lung cancer and treatments are breathlessness, fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea, and depression. Those living beyond cancer often suffer from extreme feelings of isolation and have increased chance of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Physical activity is a vital component of the prevention and management of cancer. Being active can improve one's physical health (ability to carry out tasks of daily living and breathlessness) and emotional wellbeing (feelings of depression and isolation). Electronic platforms (websites and mobile applications) are increasingly popular within developing nations, particularly with products that aim to increase and keep track of physical activity. Though, literature suggests older adults prefer websites opposed to mobile applications. Online delivery of physical activity could be highly beneficial for patients living with and beyond cancer, reducing the location-based inequality of those who can not attend face-to-face programmes, allowing individuals to carry out a session whenever they can, in the comfort of their own home. Exploring how those living with and beyond lung cancer use a website and investigating the feasibility and acceptability on an online platform which aims to provide tailored physical activity programs will provide fundamental data and possible supporting data for a randomised controlled trail (RCT).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable lung-cancer
Started Nov 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 16, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 8, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 11, 2022
CompletedNovember 1, 2022
October 1, 2022
9 months
October 20, 2021
October 31, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
The recruitment rate (Website Feasibility)
The recruitment rate will be established by the number of potential participants approached and how many agree to participate. The recruitment rate will be provided in a factorial or percentage format.
39 weeks
The retention rate (Website Feasibility)
The retention rate will be given based on the initial value of those who provide consent vs those who complete the eight-week intervention. The retention rate will be provided in a factorial or percentage format.
39 weeks
Participant Satisfaction (Acceptability)
The metric which will be assessed to explore acceptability will be satisfaction. Satisfaction will be explored in four approaches: 1. Satisfaction via research team developed questionnaire. The questionnaire will be a five-point Likert scale reporting method from "Strongly Agree" to "Strongly Disagree" in relation to their agreement to statements. 2. Real-time open-ended feedback will be collected upon the first completion of a module 3. Systems Usability Scale (Brooke, 1986). The 10-item questionnaire will provide a five-point Likert scale reporting method from "Strongly Agree" to "Strongly Disagree" in relation to their agreement to statements. 4. A selection of participants based on recruitment will be asked to take part in an interview to further explore satisfaction and acceptability. An interview guide covering the experience of using the website, concerns, and suggested revisions will be followed. The interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analysed.
39 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Quality of Life (or Global Health Status) will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3).
Eight weeks
Fatigue will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3
Eight weeks
Pain will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3)
Eight weeks
Breathlessness
Eight weeks
Physical Functioning
Eight weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Exercise Guide
EXPERIMENTALSingle group feasibility group. Single group (intervention group) will be given access to the intervention (Exercise Guide UK) for eight-weeks.
Interventions
The single group which will be given access to the eight-week ExerciseGuide UK website containing a tailored physical activity programme and supportive and educational resources.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be 18 years of age or older.
- Have had a lung cancer diagnosis.
- Be able to speak and read in English.
- Willing and able to provide informed consent.
- Have internet connectivity.
- Access to a laptop, computer, or smart device to access the web-based platform.
You may not qualify if:
- Psychological or linguistic inability to provide informed consent.
- Physical or psychological impairments which prevent or inhibit participation in physical activity. Examples include:
- Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)
- Recent heart attack (less than one year)
- Recent stroke (less than one year)
- Psychiatric disorder
- Those who lack capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Hulllead
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trustcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Queen's Centre for Oncology and Haematology (Castle Hill)
Hull, East Riding Of Yorkshire, HU16 5JQ, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Curry J, Lind M, Short CE, Vandelanotte C, Evans HEL, Pearson M, Forbes CC. Evaluating a web-based computer-tailored physical activity intervention for those living with and beyond lung cancer (ExerciseGuide UK): protocol for a single group feasibility and acceptability study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Aug 13;8(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01129-6.
PMID: 35964141DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Cynthia C Forbes, PhD
University of Hull
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Career Development Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2021
First Posted
November 16, 2021
Study Start
November 22, 2021
Primary Completion
August 8, 2022
Study Completion
August 11, 2022
Last Updated
November 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will be retained and stored for five years within an online secure folder within the Hull York Medical School server. Post five years, the data will be permanently destroyed by IT services based at the University of Hull. Per the data management plan, data will be anonymised and presented in publications arising from this study, including but no limited to the doctoral thesis of Mr. Jordan Curry and scientific article publications. Only Dr Forbes and Mr Curry will have access to the full IPD. In the thesis, blank documents pertaining to this study (informed consent form, information document, etc), will be provided.