NCT05120921

Brief Summary

This study aims to collect primary data from patients with low back pain to assess the effect of standard osteopathic management and biopsychosocially-informed osteopathic care using a Single-Case Experimental Design.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
9

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 21, 2021

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 5, 2021

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 16, 2021

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 27, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

October 21, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 23, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale changes during the treatment phase (max 6 weeks) and follow-up period (12 weeks)

    11-item unidimensional measure of pain intensity. The Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials recommendations will be used, i.e. patients will be presented with the numbers from 0 to 10, with 0 meaning 'No pain' and '10' meaning 'Pain as bad as you can imagine,' accompanied by the instructions "Please rate your pain by indicating the number that best describes your pain on average in the last 24h". NPRS is an acceptable measure but should not be used on its own as patients with chronic pain find it does not capture the complexity of their pain experience. It has a high test-retest reliability and a good validity. Patients will be asked to complete the NPRS every day, taking approx. 1 min.

    Up to 18 weeks

  • The Patient Specific Functional Scale changes during the treatment phase (max 6 weeks) and follow-up period (12 weeks)

    PSFS measures functional change in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Patients choose to list up to 5 activities that they have difficulty with or are unable to perform. They will be asked to continue recording data for the originally chosen activities but can add extra activities if goals change (e.g. due to improving or worsening symptoms). Patients will rate current level of difficulty for each activity on an 11-point scale, where 0 = unable to perform and 10 = able to perform at previous level. Mean averages are calculated by summing the difficulty ratings and dividing by the number of activities. The PSFS is reliable and responsive for patients with chronic low back pain and a Minimum Detectable Change (MDC) is considered to be 3 points for 1 activity or 2 points for the average of 2 or more activities.

    Up to 18 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Measure Your Medical Outcome Profile 2

    Up to 18 weeks

  • The Arthritis Research UK Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire

    Up to 18 weeks

  • The Depression, Anxiety, and Positive Outlook Scale

    Up to 18 weeks

  • The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (for the osteopaths)

    6 months

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Survey about experience of osteopathic treatment and of participating in the SCED study (for patients)

    6 weeks

  • Prognostic surveys (for the osteopaths)

    6 weeks

  • Survey of SCED feasibility and acceptability and impact of the e-learning course on patient care (for the osteopaths)

    9 months

Study Arms (2)

standard osteopathic manual treatment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Pragmatic individualised osteopathic manual treatment which is a system of diagnosis and treatment for a wide range of musculoskeletal conditions. Osteopaths take a detailed case history and perform a thorough clinical examination to help understand the nature of patients' pain and symptoms so that they can arrive at a diagnosis. Practitioners use touch, physical manipulation, stretching and massage to help increase the mobility of joints, to relieve muscle/joint tension and pain. Osteopaths often combine a range of other treatment techniques in their approach, such as rehabilitative exercises, advice about how patients can self-manage their condition and educational approaches to help them understand their pain. Osteopathy is a regulated profession (regulated by the General Osteopathic Council) in the UK

Other: Osteopathic Manual TreatmentOther: Self-managementOther: Reassurance

biopsychosocially informed osteopathic manual treatment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

As for the active comparator + biopsychosocial management: after having a completed a 8-10 hour e-learning on the biopsychosocial model for the management of low back pain, osteopaths will use the same approaches as in the active comparator group, plus techniques to help patients making sense of their symptoms, to develop patients' self-efficacy, and psychosocial management skills.

Other: Osteopathic Manual TreatmentOther: Self-managementOther: ReassuranceOther: Biopsychosocial management

Interventions

includes touch, joint manipulations, stretching and massage

Also known as: Osteopathic Manipulative Technique
biopsychosocially informed osteopathic manual treatmentstandard osteopathic manual treatment

Providing rehabilitative exercises to patients to do at home

Also known as: Therapeutic exercises
biopsychosocially informed osteopathic manual treatmentstandard osteopathic manual treatment

Reassuring patients on their symptoms, diagnosis and prognosis.

Also known as: cognitive reassurance; affective reassurance
biopsychosocially informed osteopathic manual treatmentstandard osteopathic manual treatment

Giving a central place to the patient in the decision-making to help them to get back to valued activities.

Also known as: Enactive approach
biopsychosocially informed osteopathic manual treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • or more years old
  • agree to take part in the study and provide formal online consent after having been assessed as capable of providing informed consent by the osteopath
  • Being fluent enough in English to be able to understand content of consent forms (and participate in osteopathic treatment without an interpreter)
  • Presenting with non-specific low back pain of a duration of a minimum of 12 weeks)
  • NRS score between 5 and 9 on a 11-point scale
  • PSFS score between 2 and 7 at baseline
  • Who can be contacted by email
  • Available for an appointment within two days around the randomisation date

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 18
  • Lacking capacity to give consent
  • Presenting with low back pain with a known or suspected pathological cause (e.g. infection, cancer or fracture)
  • People for whom osteopathic treatment may be contra-indicated (as assessed by the osteopath in the initial consultation) or who disclose information during their course of treatment which requires referral for other medical investigations or care
  • LBP of less than 12 weeks
  • NRS score below 5 or above 9
  • PSFS score above below 2 or above 7
  • Patients providing less than 3 data points during baseline

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University College of Osteopathy

London, SE1 1JE, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Draper-Rodi J, Vogel S, Bishop A. Effects of an e-learning programme on osteopaths' back pain attitudes: a mixed methods feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Sep 13;7(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00901-4.

    PMID: 34517916BACKGROUND
  • Draper-Rodi, J., Vogel, S. and Bishop, A., 2018. Design and development of an e-learning programme: An illustrative commentary. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 29, pp.36-40.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Self-ManagementExercise Therapy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RehabilitationHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy Modalities

Study Officials

  • Jerry RF Draper-Rodi, D.Prof.(Ost)

    University College of Osteopathy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The statistician will be blinded to which group patients were allocated to.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: The first group of patients will receive standard osteopathic management. The second group will receive biopsychosocially informed osteopathic management.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2021

First Posted

November 16, 2021

Study Start

November 5, 2021

Primary Completion

July 31, 2023

Study Completion

July 31, 2023

Last Updated

April 27, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Dataset will be made available with the publication or by email request to the PI

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
From publication of the results and up to 6 years after trial completion.
Access Criteria
Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to jerry.draper-rodi@uco.ac.uk To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Locations