Breaking Implicit Bias Habits: An Individuation Pilot Study In Rheumatology
2 other identifiers
interventional
201
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The first aim of this study is to test the efficacy of a real-time provider-based individuation intervention to improve the receipt of high-quality rheumatic disease care among Black/African American and lower socioeconomic status (SES) individuals. The second aim is to determine the effect of the individuation intervention on provider-patient communication, adherence, provider trust and care satisfaction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 17, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 27, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 9, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 12, 2025
CompletedNovember 12, 2025
November 1, 2025
2.3 years
October 13, 2021
September 10, 2025
November 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent of Quality Metrics Achieved
Documented receipt of high-quality care at the appointment or within 30 days of the appointment. The quality metrics for Lupus and RA include but are not limited to: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) initiation and Folic acid if receiving methotrexate, respectively. These items will be added together to form a score and the number of items completed out of the total will be the primary outcome measure compared across groups. The denominator is the patient-specific quality metrics they are eligible for and the numerator is the number achieved. The final percent ranges from 0-100 (with 100 indicating that 100% of the quality metrics that the patient was eligible for were met).
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Perception of Patient Centeredness
At time of appointment (baseline) during which audiorecording took place, reflecting the experience at the appointment immediately preceding survey completion.
Patient Satisfaction
At time of appointment (baseline) during which audiorecording took place, reflecting the experience at the appointment immediately preceding survey completion.
Everyday Discrimination Scale
A time of the appointment when audiorecording took place (baseline) asking patients to describe the degree to which each item occurs in their day-to-day life.
Adherence
3 months after the start of the intervention
Provider Communication: Positive Emotion Words
One time baseline evaluation from the transcript of the audiorecording of the encounter of the patient with their rheumatologist
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1: Individuation Intervention plus implicit bias education
EXPERIMENTAL10 rheumatologists who will have 10 patient interactions each (100 patients total) recorded Rheumatologists will watch implicit bias training modules and then will be instructed to incorporate an individuation strategy into each of their clinical encounters.
Arm 2: Implicit bias education only
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10 rheumatologists randomized and stratified by hospital and gender
Interventions
Providers in the intervention are will be instructed to watch a brief set of freely available educational lessons and then they will meet with study team members to discuss their "individuation" countermeasure intervention. Providers will be given a choice of several individuation-related questions to better understand the unique characteristics of each patient. Once the provider decides on his/her choice phrases, the research team will assist with the development of a smart phrase (also called "dot phrase") to allow them to incorporate this into a note. Once a week, providers in the intervention arm will receive an email reminding them to incorporate this question and the documentation into their encounters.
Providers in the comparator arm will be given the same implicit bias educational modules to complete.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Providers: Providers will be male or female adult rheumatologists with \>=1 clinical sessions/week at BWH/FH or MGH main campus and satellite clinic sites. The providers will aim to include a range of provider ages and years in practice.
- Patients: The study team will include male and female patients of the participating providers who are able to provide consent, English-speaking, \>=18 years old, Black or African American or insured by Medicaid/Mass Health (as a proxy for low socioeconomic status), have a diagnosis of SLE, osteoarthritis, or inflammatory arthritis which includes RA (or referred to rheumatology because of high suspicion for these conditions), and have been seen \<2 times in the past year by the provider.
You may not qualify if:
- Providers: Drs. Feldman and Schoenfeld (and their respective patients) will be excluded from this study.
- Patients: The providers will exclude patients who incarcerated or unable to consent. The providers will exclude any patient from our searches who has opted out of research.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Brigham and Women's Hospitallead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
- Virginia Commonwealth Universitycollaborator
- Massachusetts General Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Candace Feldman
- Organization
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Candace H Feldman, MD, ScD
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 13, 2021
First Posted
November 10, 2021
Study Start
June 17, 2022
Primary Completion
September 27, 2024
Study Completion
October 9, 2024
Last Updated
November 12, 2025
Results First Posted
November 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share