NCT05116163

Brief Summary

The first aim of this study is to test the efficacy of a real-time provider-based individuation intervention to improve the receipt of high-quality rheumatic disease care among Black/African American and lower socioeconomic status (SES) individuals. The second aim is to determine the effect of the individuation intervention on provider-patient communication, adherence, provider trust and care satisfaction.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
201

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 13, 2021

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 10, 2021

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 17, 2022

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 27, 2024

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 9, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 12, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 12, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

October 13, 2021

Results QC Date

September 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 4, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Implicit BiasQuality of CareRheumatology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percent of Quality Metrics Achieved

    Documented receipt of high-quality care at the appointment or within 30 days of the appointment. The quality metrics for Lupus and RA include but are not limited to: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) initiation and Folic acid if receiving methotrexate, respectively. These items will be added together to form a score and the number of items completed out of the total will be the primary outcome measure compared across groups. The denominator is the patient-specific quality metrics they are eligible for and the numerator is the number achieved. The final percent ranges from 0-100 (with 100 indicating that 100% of the quality metrics that the patient was eligible for were met).

    30 days

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Perception of Patient Centeredness

    At time of appointment (baseline) during which audiorecording took place, reflecting the experience at the appointment immediately preceding survey completion.

  • Patient Satisfaction

    At time of appointment (baseline) during which audiorecording took place, reflecting the experience at the appointment immediately preceding survey completion.

  • Everyday Discrimination Scale

    A time of the appointment when audiorecording took place (baseline) asking patients to describe the degree to which each item occurs in their day-to-day life.

  • Adherence

    3 months after the start of the intervention

  • Provider Communication: Positive Emotion Words

    One time baseline evaluation from the transcript of the audiorecording of the encounter of the patient with their rheumatologist

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Arm 1: Individuation Intervention plus implicit bias education

EXPERIMENTAL

10 rheumatologists who will have 10 patient interactions each (100 patients total) recorded Rheumatologists will watch implicit bias training modules and then will be instructed to incorporate an individuation strategy into each of their clinical encounters.

Behavioral: Individuation Intervention plus implicit bias educational modulesOther: Implicit bias educational modules

Arm 2: Implicit bias education only

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

10 rheumatologists randomized and stratified by hospital and gender

Other: Implicit bias educational modules

Interventions

Providers in the intervention are will be instructed to watch a brief set of freely available educational lessons and then they will meet with study team members to discuss their "individuation" countermeasure intervention. Providers will be given a choice of several individuation-related questions to better understand the unique characteristics of each patient. Once the provider decides on his/her choice phrases, the research team will assist with the development of a smart phrase (also called "dot phrase") to allow them to incorporate this into a note. Once a week, providers in the intervention arm will receive an email reminding them to incorporate this question and the documentation into their encounters.

Arm 1: Individuation Intervention plus implicit bias education

Providers in the comparator arm will be given the same implicit bias educational modules to complete.

Arm 1: Individuation Intervention plus implicit bias educationArm 2: Implicit bias education only

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Providers: Providers will be male or female adult rheumatologists with \>=1 clinical sessions/week at BWH/FH or MGH main campus and satellite clinic sites. The providers will aim to include a range of provider ages and years in practice.
  • Patients: The study team will include male and female patients of the participating providers who are able to provide consent, English-speaking, \>=18 years old, Black or African American or insured by Medicaid/Mass Health (as a proxy for low socioeconomic status), have a diagnosis of SLE, osteoarthritis, or inflammatory arthritis which includes RA (or referred to rheumatology because of high suspicion for these conditions), and have been seen \<2 times in the past year by the provider.

You may not qualify if:

  • Providers: Drs. Feldman and Schoenfeld (and their respective patients) will be excluded from this study.
  • Patients: The providers will exclude patients who incarcerated or unable to consent. The providers will exclude any patient from our searches who has opted out of research.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicArthritis, RheumatoidArthritisOsteoarthritisBias, Implicit

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesPrejudiceSocial BehaviorBehavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Candace Feldman
Organization
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Study Officials

  • Candace H Feldman, MD, ScD

    Brigham and Women's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The investigators plan to enroll 20 rheumatologists and a maximum of 200 patients randomized into two different control arms. The providers will observe the outcomes in each separate arm as well as evaluate the results of both arms to each other.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2021

First Posted

November 10, 2021

Study Start

June 17, 2022

Primary Completion

September 27, 2024

Study Completion

October 9, 2024

Last Updated

November 12, 2025

Results First Posted

November 12, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations