NCT05112042

Brief Summary

The current evaluations of the levels of consciousness during anesthesia have limited precision. This can produce negative clinical consequences such as intraoperative awareness or neurological damage due to under- or over-infusion of anesthesia, respectively. The study's objective is to determine and classify biomarkers of electrical and hemodynamical brain activity associated with the levels of consciousness between wakefulness and anesthesia. For this purpose, a parietal electroencephalography (EEG) and a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measurement paradigm will be used, as well as machine-learning. Volunteering patients (n = 25), who will be subject to an endoscopy procedure, will be measured during the infusion of anesthesia with propofol. EEG and fNIRS parameters will then be related to the Modified Ramsay clinical scale of consciousness.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
13

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 10, 2021

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 8, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 14, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 4, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

October 10, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 3, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

AnesthesiaConsciousnessEndoscopyfNIRSPropofolParietalElectroencephalographyFunctional near-infrared spectroscopyEEGMachine learning

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Brain electrophysiological activity by electroencephalography wavelength band powers

    The delta (0.1-3 Hz), theta (4-7 Hz), lower-alpha (8-12 Hz), upper-alpha (12-15 Hz), and beta/gamma (15-40 Hz) electroencephalography wavelength band powers will be used as features for the decoding model.

    During the whole endoscopy and recovery (1 - 2 hours)

  • Temporal brain oxygenation by near-infrared light spectroscopy wavelengths

    The temporal brain area of the oxygenated (HbO2) and deoxygenated (HHb) hemoglobin will be obtained from the optical signals, using the modified Beer-Lambert law.

    During the whole endoscopy and recovery (1 - 2 hours)

  • Levels of Consciousness with the Modified Ramsay Sedation Scale

    During infusion, the Modified Ramsay Scale will be used by the anesthetist in charge to measure the patient's level of consciousness. This scale has a total of eight levels, each of which indicates an increasing level of unconsciousness, assessed qualitatively by the patient's response to verbal or painful stimuli. The level of consciousness will be evaluated every two minutes until complete loss of consciousness, which is assumed after the loss of defensive or purposeful response to a second standard tetanic stimulation.

    20 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • BRICE survey responses

    10 minutes

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Relatively healthy volunteering patients, within 20 to 40 years of age, who will undergo an endoscopy procedure and meet all the eligibility criteria.

You may qualify if:

  • ASA I or II
  • Patients who will undergo an endoscopy procedure

You may not qualify if:

  • Alcohol or drug consumption within 48 hours
  • Known or suspected pregnancy
  • Any diagnosed psychiatric condition
  • Any diagnosed neurological condition or implant
  • Any diagnosed chronic disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centro de Especialidades Médicas UC

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8320000, Chile

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Aru J, Suzuki M, Larkum ME. Cellular Mechanisms of Conscious Processing. Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Oct;24(10):814-825. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.006. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

    PMID: 32855048BACKGROUND
  • Campbell JM, Huang Z, Zhang J, Wu X, Qin P, Northoff G, Mashour GA, Hudetz AG. Pharmacologically informed machine learning approach for identifying pathological states of unconsciousness via resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 1;206:116316. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116316. Epub 2019 Oct 29.

    PMID: 31672663BACKGROUND
  • Davidson AJ. Anesthesia and neurotoxicity to the developing brain: the clinical relevance. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Jul;21(7):716-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03506.x. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

    PMID: 21466608BACKGROUND
  • Hirota K. Special cases: ketamine, nitrous oxide and xenon. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Mar;20(1):69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2005.08.014.

    PMID: 16634415BACKGROUND
  • Saadeh W, Khan FH, Altaf MAB. Design and Implementation of a Machine Learning Based EEG Processor for Accurate Estimation of Depth of Anesthesia. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2019 Aug;13(4):658-669. doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2019.2921875. Epub 2019 Jun 10.

    PMID: 31180871BACKGROUND
  • Kotsovolis G, Komninos G. Awareness during anesthesia: how sure can we be that the patient is sleeping indeed? Hippokratia. 2009 Apr;13(2):83-9.

    PMID: 19561776BACKGROUND
  • Lee, M. H., Fazli, S., Mehnert, J., & Lee, S. W. (2015). Subject-dependent classification for robust idle state detection using multi-modal neuroimaging and data-fusion techniques in BCI. Pattern Recognition, 48(8), 2725-2737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2015.03.010

    BACKGROUND
  • Leon-Dominguez U, Izzetoglu M, Leon-Carrion J, Solis-Marcos I, Garcia-Torrado FJ, Forastero-Rodriguez A, Mellado-Miras P, Villegas-Duque D, Lopez-Romero JL, Onaral B, Izzetoglu K. Molecular concentration of deoxyHb in human prefrontal cortex predicts the emergence and suppression of consciousness. Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 15;85 Pt 1:616-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.023. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

    PMID: 23872157BACKGROUND
  • Levitt DG, Schnider TW. Human physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for propofol. BMC Anesthesiol. 2005 Apr 22;5(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-5-4.

    PMID: 15847680BACKGROUND
  • Sheahan CG, Mathews DM. Monitoring and delivery of sedation. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Dec;113 Suppl 2:ii37-47. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu378.

    PMID: 25498581BACKGROUND
  • Sebel PS, Bowdle TA, Ghoneim MM, Rampil IJ, Padilla RE, Gan TJ, Domino KB. The incidence of awareness during anesthesia: a multicenter United States study. Anesth Analg. 2004 Sep;99(3):833-839. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130261.90896.6C.

    PMID: 15333419BACKGROUND
  • Sepulveda P, Cortinez LI, Irani M, Egana JI, Contreras V, Sanchez Corzo A, Acosta I, Sitaram R. Differential frontal alpha oscillations and mechanisms underlying loss of consciousness: a comparison between slow and fast propofol infusion rates. Anaesthesia. 2020 Feb;75(2):196-201. doi: 10.1111/anae.14885. Epub 2019 Dec 1.

    PMID: 31788791BACKGROUND
  • Sitaram R, Ros T, Stoeckel L, Haller S, Scharnowski F, Lewis-Peacock J, Weiskopf N, Blefari ML, Rana M, Oblak E, Birbaumer N, Sulzer J. Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Feb;18(2):86-100. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.164. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

    PMID: 28003656BACKGROUND
  • Yeom SK, Won DO, Chi SI, Seo KS, Kim HJ, Muller KR, Lee SW. Spatio-temporal dynamics of multimodal EEG-fNIRS signals in the loss and recovery of consciousness under sedation using midazolam and propofol. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187743. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 29121108BACKGROUND
  • Zimeo Morais GA, Balardin JB, Sato JR. fNIRS Optodes' Location Decider (fOLD): a toolbox for probe arrangement guided by brain regions-of-interest. Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 20;8(1):3341. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21716-z.

    PMID: 29463928BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Unconsciousness

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Consciousness DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Catalina A Saini

    Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
BS

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2021

First Posted

November 8, 2021

Study Start

May 14, 2022

Primary Completion

March 1, 2023

Study Completion

March 1, 2023

Last Updated

April 4, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The Department of Anesthesiology and the Institute of Biological and Medical Engineering (IIBM) of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, will take the necessary measurements to protect the access to your clinical information and sensible data from unauthorized people. All the obtained information will be kept confidential. The name, ID, or any other identifiable information, will be anonymized in a database. This information will be stored for five years under the responsibility of the corresponding researchers. The collected data will be published to be used in other studies related to anesthesia and consciousness. All published data will be completely anonymized. It is possible that the obtained results are presented in journals and medical or scientific conferences. However, the name and identifiable data will not be known.

Locations