Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia
EDPARMRCT
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective, randomized, double-blind study is designed to evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to ropivacaine in erector spinae block in patients undergoing radical mastectomy. The investigators hypothesis is that the administration of ropivacaine 0.5% associated with dexmedetomidine in the blockade via the plane in the erector spinae is less effective in controlling acute postoperative pain in radical mastectomy than the administration of ropivacaine 0.5% without dexmedetomidine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Nov 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 5, 2021
CompletedNovember 5, 2021
October 1, 2021
1.9 years
October 12, 2021
October 25, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Postoperative Pain score
The intensity of pain is evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) that measures pain severity expressed on a numerical scale of 0-10: 0, "no pain"; 10, "worst pain imaginable"
0 hours
Postoperative Pain score
The intensity of pain is evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) that measures pain severity expressed on a numerical scale of 0-10: 0, "no pain"; 10, "worst pain imaginable"
6 hours
Postoperative Pain score
The intensity of pain is evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) that measures pain severity expressed on a numerical scale of 0-10: 0, "no pain"; 10, "worst pain imaginable"
12 hours
Postoperative Pain score
The intensity of pain is evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) that measures pain severity expressed on a numerical scale of 0-10: 0, "no pain"; 10, "worst pain imaginable"
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Additional opioid-type drugs
24 hours
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Ropivacaine plus Dexmedetomidine
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to standard general anesthesia, patients receive erector spinae block with ropivacaine at a dose of 0.5% plus dexmedetomidine at 0.3 mcg / kg corrected in a volume of 20 ml at the level of thoracic vertebra number 4, guided with ultrasound and under sterile technique, the date and time of application are recorded on the data collection sheet.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn addition to standard general anesthesia, patients receive erector spinae block with ropivacaine at a dose of 0.5% in a volume of 20 ml at the level of thoracic vertebra number 4, guided with ultrasound and under sterile technique, the date and time of application are recorded on the data collection sheet.
Interventions
Erector spinae block with ropivacaine at a dose of 0.5% plus dexmedetomidine at 0.3 mcg / kg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing radical mastectomy for pathology "breast cancer"
- Patient undergoing anesthetic technique due to erector spinae plane block
- Informed consent to perform the anesthesia technique.
- Karnofsky\> 80 points
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgery
- Patient with mental pathology that prevents pain assessment.
- Rejection of anesthetic technique.
- Patient with allergy to local anesthetics
- Patient with local infection of the puncture site for application of the erector spinae block
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jose Camilo Muñoz Chaves
Matamoros, Tamaulipas, 87000, Mexico
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The outcome assessor did not know the allocation of the participants. The patient is not informed of the medication used in the erector spinae block.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2021
First Posted
November 5, 2021
Study Start
November 1, 2019
Primary Completion
September 30, 2021
Study Completion
September 30, 2021
Last Updated
November 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10