Developing a Clinical Outcome Assessment for Opioid Craving
2 other identifiers
interventional
81
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to collect information about opioid craving so that the investigators can develop an opioid craving assessment to improve treatments for individuals with opioid use disorder. To collect this information, the investigators are recruiting individuals in treatment for opioid use disorder who will complete cue-induced opioid craving tasks where these individuals will: (1) look at pictures of neutral objects and touch neutral objects (e.g., water bottles or flashlights), (2) look at opioid-related images, and (3) look and touch opioid-related objects. Participants will then complete a one-on-one interview about the thoughts, feelings and physical sensations the participants experienced during the cue-induced craving session. Participants will also complete questionnaires and existing opioid craving assessments. Finally, participants will provide formal feedback about existing opioid craving assessments with cognitive interviews.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 5, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 3, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2026
October 23, 2025
October 1, 2025
4.6 years
October 15, 2021
October 21, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Craving Domains
Immediately following each cue condition, participants will be asked the following open-ended questions: (1) Describe your mood, (2) Describe how you feel, and (3) What symptoms are you experiencing? Responses will be recorded using a digital audio recorder. Qualitative data collected on the symptoms, moods and feelings following cue-induced craving tasks will be transcribed and independently coded for common craving domains based on our published preliminary study by two raters. Raters will also document other potential domains that do not fit into any of the a priori categories. Ad Hoc domains require that both raters agree that a new category should be created. Independently coded responses will be compared and incongruencies will be reviewed by a third rater who will make the final designation. The types and frequencies of craving domains will be summarized with descriptive statistics.
Sessions 1, 2, and 3 after the cue-induced craving task (approximately 1 hour into session)
Change in Acceptability of Craving Assessments
Responses to the question "What was this question designed to measure?" will be coded by two independent raters as either "Demonstrates understanding" or "Does not demonstrate understanding". Next, responses to the question "What would you change, if anything, about this measure?", will be transcribed and independently coded by two raters as either "no changes needed" or "changes needed". Responses will be compared and incongruencies will be reviewed by a third rater who will make the final designation. If final responses to either question is determined to be either "does not demonstrate understanding" and/or "changes needed", the question will be labeled as unacceptable. For each craving assessment item, the proportion of participants who describe the item as unacceptable will be computed. The proportions of responses designated as "does not demonstrate understanding" and "changes needed" will also be computed.
Sessions 1, 2, and 3 after cue-induced craving task (approximately 1 hour into session)
Change in Deficits in Craving Assessments
Responses to the question "What was not captured by these questions that you would include in a measure for assessing opioid craving?" will be coded for themes by two independent raters. Independently coded responses will be compared and incongruencies will be reviewed by a third rater who will make the final designation. The types and frequencies of recommendations will be summarized with descriptive statistics.
Sessions 1, 2, and 3 after cue-induced craving task (approximately 1 hour into session)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Predictive utility of craving assessment items
Sessions 1, 2, and 3 during and immediately after the cue-induced craving assessment (approximately 1 hour into session)
Study Arms (1)
No Craving
EXPERIMENTALEach participant will attend three sessions where the participant will experience three distinct cue-induced craving tasks in a randomized fashion.
Interventions
For the neutral cue condition, the participant will be seated in front of a 16-inch monitor and instructed to sit upright to view 20 pictures of water bottles via E-Prime software (Psychology Software Tools Inc., PA), presented for five seconds each in randomized order. The images will include pictures of a water bottle alone, water being poured from a bottle to a glass, and an individual drinking from a bottle of water. Next, participants will watch as research staff open a bottle of water, pour it into a glass, and place it on a table in front of the participant. Participants will also be asked to look at a water bottle, hold it, sniff it, and take a drink of water.
For the visual opioid cue-induced craving condition, the participant will again be seated in front of a 16-inch monitor and instructed to sit upright to view 20 pictures of opioid-related imagery, presented for five seconds each in a randomized order. The opioid-related imagery will be customized for heroin or prescription opioids based upon the participant's primary opioid of choice. The images will include pills and white powder, stages of drug taking preparation (e.g., holding spoon over flame, pills being crushed).
For the visual and tactile opioid cue condition, procedures will differ depending on the participants' most preferred route of administration. . Intranasal users will be instructed to watch as research staff opens a wallet, removes a $1 bill, removes a packet of powder mimicking heroin/crushed pills, open the packet, and roll the dollar bill. The participant will then be given the packet and the dollar bill to hold for approximately 30 seconds. Intravenous users will be instructed to watch the research nurse open the packet of fake heroin, pour its contents into a spoon, added a few drops of water to the spoon, hold an open flame from a lighter under the spoon, add cotton to the spoon, and draw the fluid into a syringe.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age and older
- Opioid-positive urine sample at admission visit (excluding individuals receiving Naltrexone).
- Current opioid use disorder per Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM)-5
- Currently in treatment for opioid use disorder
You may not qualify if:
- Being pregnant or breastfeeding, or may become pregnant during the trial
- History of psychosis or mania or other serious psychiatric disorders assessed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview
- Past 30-day suicidal behavior assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale
- Have circumstances that would interfere with study participation (e.g., impending jail).
- Positive for illicit substances except opioids and cannabis
- Current substance use disorder other than opioid or nicotine
- Current intoxication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cecilia L Bergeria, PhD
Johns Hopkins University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- It is not possible to blind the participant nor some of the research staff to the study condition. The research staff who will interview the participant will be blinded to what cue condition participant had completed.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 15, 2021
First Posted
November 5, 2021
Study Start
March 3, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Last Updated
October 23, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share