Intradermal Lidocaine Via MicronJet600 Microneedle Device
The Use of MicronJet600 Microneedle for Intradermal Lidocaine Injection to Ensure Local Anaesthesia During Insertion of Peripheral Venous Catheters
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine efficiency and safety of injecting a micro-amount of 2% lidocaine with the commercially available microneedle device MinronJet600 (NanoPass Technologies Ltd, Israel) (registration number RZN2017/5544 by Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare of Russian Federation) to achieve rapid local anesthesia for peripheral venous cannulation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 29, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 5, 2021
CompletedNovember 5, 2021
September 1, 2021
2 months
September 21, 2021
October 25, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Pain scores, reported by the subjects due to painful stimulus by intravenous catheterisation with 18G cannula
Pain scores experienced by the subjects due to intravenous catheterisation with 18G cannula. were recorded by using a 100-point visual analogue scale.
Immediately after intravenous catheterisation with 18G cannula.
Pain scores, reported by the subjects due to painful stimulus due to a pin-prick with a 27G needle (1)
Pain scores experienced by the subjects due to a pin-prick with a 27G needle at 1, 2 and 3 centimetres from the site of intradermal lidocaine injection were recorded by using a 100-point visual analogue scale.
At 15 minutes after the intradermal lidocaine injection.
Pain scores, reported by the subjects due to painful stimulus due to a pin-prick with a 27G needle (2)
Pain scores experienced by the subjects due to a pin-prick with a 27G needle at 1, 2 and 3 centimetres from the site of intradermal lidocaine injection were recorded by using a 100-point visual analogue scale.
At 30 minutes minutes after the intradermal lidocaine injection.
Pain scores, reported by the subjects due to painful stimulus due to a pin-prick with a 27G needle (3)
Pain scores experienced by the subjects due to a pin-prick with a 27G needle at 1, 2 and 3 centimetres from the site of intradermal lidocaine injection were recorded by using a 100-point visual analogue scale.
At 45 minutes after the intradermal lidocaine injection.
Prevalence of adverse events.
Any kind of local and systemic adverse events were recorded after the lidocaine injection with MicronJet600 followed by the intravenous cannulation.
24 hours after the lidocaine injection with MicronJet600.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Preference to receive injection of lidocaine with MicronJet600 prior to intravenous cannulation, over the cannulation without any pre-treatment.
Immediately after the intravenous catheterisation with 18G cannula.
Study Arms (4)
Group 1. Left arm.
EXPERIMENTALHealthy subjects, who underwent the following intervention: intradermal injection of lidocaine hydrochloride injectable solution via MicronJet600 microneedle device at the site of antecubital fossa of the left arm, followed by the insertion of 18G catheter in a cubital vein.
Group 1. Right arm.
PLACEBO COMPARATORHealthy subjects, who underwent the following intervention: intradermal injection of sterile saline via MicronJet600 microneedle device at the site of antecubital fossa of the right arm, followed by the insertion of 18G catheter in a cubital vein.
Group 2. Left arm.
EXPERIMENTALHealthy subjects, who underwent the following intervention: intradermal injection of lidocaine hydrochloride injectable solution via MicronJet600 microneedle device at the site of antecubital fossa of the left arm, followed by the insertion of 18G catheter in a cubital vein.
Group 2. Right arm.
ACTIVE COMPARATORHealthy subjects, who underwent the following intervention: insertion of 18G catheter in a cubital vein at the site of antecubital fossa of the right arm, without any prior intervention.
Interventions
Intradermal administration of 100 µL of lidocaine (registrational number LS001516 by Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare of Russian Federation) via MicronJet600 microneedle device at the site of antecubital fossa of the left arm, followed by the insertion of 18G catheter in a cubital vein immediately after the lidocaine administration.
Intradermal administration of 100 µL saline (registration number РN002134/01 by Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare of Russian Federation) via MicronJet600 microneedle device at the site of antecubital fossa of the right arm, followed by the insertion of 18G catheter in a cubital vein immediately after the saline administration.
Intradermal administration of 100 µL of lidocaine (registrational number LS001516 by Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare of Russian Federation) via MicronJet600 microneedle device at the site of antecubital fossa of the left arm, followed by the insertion of 18G catheter in a cubital vein immediately after the lidocaine administration.
insertion of 18G catheter in a cubital vein without prior interventions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any gender
- Age at 18-65 years
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Evidence of allergy to lidocaine
- Presence of pain of any localization and character not associated with the study or treatment with any analgesics
- Any perceptual disorders
- Neuropathies or stroke in anamnesis
- Any psychiatric disorders
- Any disorder of tissues at the site of intervention - the antecubital fossa
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Clinical Hospital №2 (I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University))
Moscow, 119435, Russia
Related Publications (1)
Rzhevskiy A, Popov A, Pavlov C, Anissimov Y, Zvyagin A, Levin Y, Kochba E. Intradermal injection of lidocaine with a microneedle device to provide rapid local anaesthesia for peripheral intravenous cannulation: A randomised open-label placebo-controlled clinical trial. PLoS One. 2022 Jan 31;17(1):e0261641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261641. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35100279DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chavdar Dr Pavlov, MD, PhD
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2021
First Posted
November 5, 2021
Study Start
January 29, 2019
Primary Completion
March 15, 2019
Study Completion
March 17, 2019
Last Updated
November 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The local ethics committee of the Sechenov University does not allow to share IPD; it is possible only upon an official request addressed to the principal investigator.