IVIG Versus Plasmapheresis in the Treatment of Guillian Barrie Syndrome Patients
IVIG Versus Plasmapheresis and Guillian Barrie Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
81
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators address the question: whether treatment with IVIG is superior to treatment using plasmapheresis for functional recovery of patients with GBS? Recovery was quantified using: The changes in the A-Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score ) and B-overall neuropathy limitations scale as the primary outcome and the changes in Neurophysiological study 3 months after treatment as a secondary outcome. This information will be used to evaluate which treatment is more beneficial to GBS patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 2, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 3, 2023
CompletedApril 6, 2023
April 1, 2023
6 months
October 21, 2021
April 4, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score )
Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score ) from zero ( no power ) up to 60 full power (points): sum score of muscle power in both upper limbs and lower limbs in points .
the points change from baseline scale and after 3 months follow up
Overall neuropathy limitations scale (ONLS) .
it is modified disability sum score: sum of arm grade and leg grade limitation score; arm grade from zero point ( less limitation ) to 5 points ( most limitation ) and leg grade from zero point ( less limitation) to 7 points (more limitation)
the changes in points from baseline assessment score to 3 months follow up assessment score.
ERASMUS GBS respiratory insufficiency score EGRIS
Predict the probability of respiratory insufficiency within the first week of admission, in individual patients with Guillain-Barre. syndrome from zero to 7 points score : 0 point ( no affection ) , 7 point ( severe affection )
the change in points from baseline assessment score to 3 months follow up assessment score.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Neurophysiological study: Distal latency in mill second, Nerve conduction velocities in Meter/second, and F-wave latency mill second
the change in points from baseline assessment score to 3 months follow up assessment score.
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1 plasmapheresis
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm 1 (plasmapheresis): This study will be conducted at Assiut University at Neurology and psychiatry department as Group 1 of patients presented with Guillian Barrie syndrome (54 patients) will be subjected to plasmapheresis after assessment of clinical state and scales including MRC, Erasmus Guillain-Barre respiratory insufficiency score and Overall neuropathy limitation scale and Neurophysiological studies. Each patient was evaluated at baseline and at Follow up assessment points (one month and 3 months, one year follow up)
Arm 2: Intravenous injection of immunoglobulin
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis study will be conducted at Assiut University at Neurology and psychiatry department as Group 2 of patients presented with Guillian Barrie syndrome (27 patients) will be subjected to intravenous injection of immunoglobulin after assessment of clinical state and scales including MRC, Erasmus Guillain-Barre respiratory insufficiency score, and Overall neuropathy limitation scale and Neurophysiological studies. Each patient was evaluated at baseline and at Follow up assessment points (one month and 3 months, one year follow up).
Interventions
Group 1: 54 patients of Guillian Barrie syndrome undergo plasma exchange (5 sessions)
group 2: 27 patients undergo intravenous injection of immunoglobulin for 5 consecutive days of IVIG 0.4gm/kg/day.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: 18-70 years old,
- Onset: Recent onset of GBS through the first 2 weeks.
You may not qualify if:
- patients with metabolic disorders, or malignancy,
- other causes of peripheral neuropathy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assiut university
Asyut, Egypt
Related Publications (10)
Dornonville de la Cour C, Jakobsen J. Residual neuropathy in long-term population-based follow-up of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Neurology. 2005 Jan 25;64(2):246-53. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000149521.65474.83.
PMID: 15668421BACKGROUNDvan Koningsveld R, Steyerberg EW, Hughes RA, Swan AV, van Doorn PA, Jacobs BC. A clinical prognostic scoring system for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Jul;6(7):589-94. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70130-8.
PMID: 17537676BACKGROUNDFokke C, van den Berg B, Drenthen J, Walgaard C, van Doorn PA, Jacobs BC. Diagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome and validation of Brighton criteria. Brain. 2014 Jan;137(Pt 1):33-43. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt285. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
PMID: 24163275BACKGROUNDWalgaard C, Lingsma HF, Ruts L, van Doorn PA, Steyerberg EW, Jacobs BC. Early recognition of poor prognosis in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Neurology. 2011 Mar 15;76(11):968-75. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182104407.
PMID: 21403108BACKGROUNDRaphael JC, Chevret S, Hughes RA, Annane D. Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;(7):CD001798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001798.pub2.
PMID: 22786475BACKGROUNDvan Doorn PA, Ruts L, Jacobs BC. Clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):939-50. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70215-1.
PMID: 18848313BACKGROUNDvan Doorn PA. Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). Presse Med. 2013 Jun;42(6 Pt 2):e193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2013.02.328. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
PMID: 23628447BACKGROUNDvan Nes SI, Vanhoutte EK, van Doorn PA, Hermans M, Bakkers M, Kuitwaard K, Faber CG, Merkies IS. Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) for immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies. Neurology. 2011 Jan 25;76(4):337-45. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318208824b.
PMID: 21263135BACKGROUNDMori M, Kuwabara S, Fukutake T, Hattori T. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for Miller Fisher syndrome. Neurology. 2007 Apr 3;68(14):1144-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000258673.31824.61.
PMID: 17404197BACKGROUNDKalita J, Misra UK, Goyal G, Das M. Guillain-Barre syndrome: subtypes and predictors of outcome from India. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2014 Mar;19(1):36-43. doi: 10.1111/jns5.12050.
PMID: 24456386BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Triple-blind (participant and investigator, accessor) using closed envelope 2:1 was applied. 5 sessions of plasmapheresis: IVIG 0.4g IVIG/Kg /day for 5 consecutive days. The investigators didn't know what was the type of treatment that patients received and the patient didn't know that there is another line of treatment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2021
First Posted
November 3, 2021
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion
March 2, 2022
Study Completion
March 3, 2023
Last Updated
April 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04