NCT05104762

Brief Summary

In this study, the investigators address the question: whether treatment with IVIG is superior to treatment using plasmapheresis for functional recovery of patients with GBS? Recovery was quantified using: The changes in the A-Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score ) and B-overall neuropathy limitations scale as the primary outcome and the changes in Neurophysiological study 3 months after treatment as a secondary outcome. This information will be used to evaluate which treatment is more beneficial to GBS patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
81

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 21, 2021

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 3, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 2, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 3, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 6, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

October 21, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 4, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

IVIG / plasmapheresis and Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score )

    Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score ) from zero ( no power ) up to 60 full power (points): sum score of muscle power in both upper limbs and lower limbs in points .

    the points change from baseline scale and after 3 months follow up

  • Overall neuropathy limitations scale (ONLS) .

    it is modified disability sum score: sum of arm grade and leg grade limitation score; arm grade from zero point ( less limitation ) to 5 points ( most limitation ) and leg grade from zero point ( less limitation) to 7 points (more limitation)

    the changes in points from baseline assessment score to 3 months follow up assessment score.

  • ERASMUS GBS respiratory insufficiency score EGRIS

    Predict the probability of respiratory insufficiency within the first week of admission, in individual patients with Guillain-Barre. syndrome from zero to 7 points score : 0 point ( no affection ) , 7 point ( severe affection )

    the change in points from baseline assessment score to 3 months follow up assessment score.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Neurophysiological study: Distal latency in mill second, Nerve conduction velocities in Meter/second, and F-wave latency mill second

    the change in points from baseline assessment score to 3 months follow up assessment score.

Study Arms (2)

Arm 1 plasmapheresis

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Arm 1 (plasmapheresis): This study will be conducted at Assiut University at Neurology and psychiatry department as Group 1 of patients presented with Guillian Barrie syndrome (54 patients) will be subjected to plasmapheresis after assessment of clinical state and scales including MRC, Erasmus Guillain-Barre respiratory insufficiency score and Overall neuropathy limitation scale and Neurophysiological studies. Each patient was evaluated at baseline and at Follow up assessment points (one month and 3 months, one year follow up)

Device: plasmapheresis device

Arm 2: Intravenous injection of immunoglobulin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This study will be conducted at Assiut University at Neurology and psychiatry department as Group 2 of patients presented with Guillian Barrie syndrome (27 patients) will be subjected to intravenous injection of immunoglobulin after assessment of clinical state and scales including MRC, Erasmus Guillain-Barre respiratory insufficiency score, and Overall neuropathy limitation scale and Neurophysiological studies. Each patient was evaluated at baseline and at Follow up assessment points (one month and 3 months, one year follow up).

Drug: Intravenous immunoglobulin

Interventions

Group 1: 54 patients of Guillian Barrie syndrome undergo plasma exchange (5 sessions)

Also known as: plasma exchange device
Arm 1 plasmapheresis

group 2: 27 patients undergo intravenous injection of immunoglobulin for 5 consecutive days of IVIG 0.4gm/kg/day.

Also known as: IVIG
Arm 2: Intravenous injection of immunoglobulin

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age: 18-70 years old,
  • Onset: Recent onset of GBS through the first 2 weeks.

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with metabolic disorders, or malignancy,
  • other causes of peripheral neuropathy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assiut university

Asyut, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Dornonville de la Cour C, Jakobsen J. Residual neuropathy in long-term population-based follow-up of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Neurology. 2005 Jan 25;64(2):246-53. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000149521.65474.83.

    PMID: 15668421BACKGROUND
  • van Koningsveld R, Steyerberg EW, Hughes RA, Swan AV, van Doorn PA, Jacobs BC. A clinical prognostic scoring system for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Jul;6(7):589-94. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70130-8.

    PMID: 17537676BACKGROUND
  • Fokke C, van den Berg B, Drenthen J, Walgaard C, van Doorn PA, Jacobs BC. Diagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome and validation of Brighton criteria. Brain. 2014 Jan;137(Pt 1):33-43. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt285. Epub 2013 Oct 26.

    PMID: 24163275BACKGROUND
  • Walgaard C, Lingsma HF, Ruts L, van Doorn PA, Steyerberg EW, Jacobs BC. Early recognition of poor prognosis in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Neurology. 2011 Mar 15;76(11):968-75. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182104407.

    PMID: 21403108BACKGROUND
  • Raphael JC, Chevret S, Hughes RA, Annane D. Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;(7):CD001798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001798.pub2.

    PMID: 22786475BACKGROUND
  • van Doorn PA, Ruts L, Jacobs BC. Clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):939-50. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70215-1.

    PMID: 18848313BACKGROUND
  • van Doorn PA. Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). Presse Med. 2013 Jun;42(6 Pt 2):e193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2013.02.328. Epub 2013 Apr 28.

    PMID: 23628447BACKGROUND
  • van Nes SI, Vanhoutte EK, van Doorn PA, Hermans M, Bakkers M, Kuitwaard K, Faber CG, Merkies IS. Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) for immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies. Neurology. 2011 Jan 25;76(4):337-45. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318208824b.

    PMID: 21263135BACKGROUND
  • Mori M, Kuwabara S, Fukutake T, Hattori T. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for Miller Fisher syndrome. Neurology. 2007 Apr 3;68(14):1144-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000258673.31824.61.

    PMID: 17404197BACKGROUND
  • Kalita J, Misra UK, Goyal G, Das M. Guillain-Barre syndrome: subtypes and predictors of outcome from India. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2014 Mar;19(1):36-43. doi: 10.1111/jns5.12050.

    PMID: 24456386BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Interventions

Immunoglobulins, Intravenous

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PolyradiculoneuropathyAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesDemyelinating DiseasesPolyneuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesPost-Infectious DisordersChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Immunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin IsotypesAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulins

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Triple-blind (participant and investigator, accessor) using closed envelope 2:1 was applied. 5 sessions of plasmapheresis: IVIG 0.4g IVIG/Kg /day for 5 consecutive days. The investigators didn't know what was the type of treatment that patients received and the patient didn't know that there is another line of treatment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 2 groups of patients with Guillian Barrie syndrome were subjected to plasmapheresis or IVIG by percentage 2:1 respectively according to availability of IVIG
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2021

First Posted

November 3, 2021

Study Start

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion

March 2, 2022

Study Completion

March 3, 2023

Last Updated

April 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations