Thoracic Manipulation Versus Myofascial Release in Patients With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
aims: • To investigate the effect of adding thoracic manipulation vs myofascial release to scapular stabilization exercise on pain intensity.
- To investigate the effect of adding thoracic manipulation vs myofascial release to scapular stabilization exercise on pain pressure threshold.
- To investigate the effect of adding thoracic manipulation vs myofascial release to scapular stabilization exercise on shoulder proprioception.
- To investigate the effect of adding thoracic manipulation vs myofascial release to scapular stabilization exercise on shoulder range of motion(ROM).
- To investigate the effect of adding thoracic manipulation vs myofascial release to scapular stabilization exercise on disability of shoulder and hand questionnaire(DASH).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2023
CompletedJuly 24, 2025
July 1, 2025
1.5 years
July 18, 2021
July 21, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pain in shoulder movement
will be measured by Visual analog scale(VAS). It consists of a line, often 10 cm long(100mm); its ends are generally labelled with verbal pain anchors (e.g., "no pain" and "pain as bad as it could be"). Patients are asked to indicate the point along the line that best reflects their pain intensity. The majority of the studies showed that visual analogue scale is a valid and reliable scale. Also, it is an interval scale. So, in clinical practice we can use this scale in case of pain measurement as an outcome measure tool.
change from max pain point at 2 months
shoulder function
by DASH is a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of shoulder pain and disability in both clinical practice and research.
change from limitation of function at 2 months
Shoulder Proprioception (joint of position error)
will be measured by isokinetic dynamometer. Isokinetic dynamometry is considered a valid instrument for assessing muscle strength, and it is often used as a reference standard for other strength assessments.
change from poor proprioception at 2 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Shoulder ROM
change from limitation in shoulder ROM at 2 months
Pain pressure threshold in shoulder muscles
change from baseline pain pressure threshold at 2 months
Study Arms (3)
Scapular stabilization exercises
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup I (control group) will receive scapular stabilization exercises.
Thoracic manipulation.
EXPERIMENTALGroup II will receive scapular stabilization exercises and thoracic manipulation.
Myofascial release
EXPERIMENTALGroup III will receive scapular stabilization exercises and myofascial release by instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization techniques.
Interventions
General Instructions: For all exercises, perform the retraction of the scapula, without performing the elevation of the shoulders, taking the lower angle of the scapula "back and down". The exercise intensity was described as repetitions, sets, and holding time. Commonly, 10-20 repetitions and three to five sets held for 3-10 seconds were performed.and the exercises will be: 1. towel slide 2. Scapular Clock: 3. Scapular Proprioceptive Neuromuscular facilitation: 4. Inferior Glide. 5. Scapular Orientation Exercise (SOE): 6. Protraction and retraction in front of a mirror:
• Thoracic Thrust Manipulation: The participants were in high sitting and in prone lying position. The therapist was standing next to the patient in a diagonal stance and also behind the patient during high sitting. Thoracic thrust manipulation demonstrated to manipulate specific thoracic segment mainly mid thoracic.
The subject will be treated with IASTM.applied to the pectoral muscles and medial brachium with the subject in supine and the glenohumeral joint(GH). placed in 120 º abduction to place adequate tension on the selected tissues in the style of pectoral tightness test .The IASTM technique was performed for 20 seconds parallel to the muscle fibers followed by 20 seconds perpendicular to the muscle fibers with the instrument held at a 45 º angle to the skin.The same IASTM protocol of 20 seconds parallel to the muscle fibers and 20 seconds perpendicular to the muscle fibers was applied to the posterior cuff musculature of the GH joint with the subject in prone and arms in 90 º abduction and internal rotation draped over the side of the plinth . While in the same position, the technique was applied to the periscapular musculature including the, trapezoids, rhomboids, teres minor, teres major, and latissimus dorsi.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Sixty patients with shoulder impingement syndrome from both genders their age will be ranged and divided into three groups from 25-40 years.
- History of shoulder pain for at least one month.
- Positive Neer's impingement test and Hawkins's kiennedy test.
- Presence of thoracic hypomobility from clinical evaluation.
- Provocation of pain above 60 degrees of flexion and abduction.
- Palpable trigger points on shoulder muscles.
You may not qualify if:
- History of Shoulder girdle fracture, dislocation and surgery
- Diagnosed with frozen shoulder or rotator cuff tear
- History of cervicobrachial pain
- Any neuromuscular pain in upper limb and use of corticosteroids or pain subsiding medication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- manar sameh el taherlead
- Cairo Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2021
First Posted
November 3, 2021
Study Start
December 1, 2021
Primary Completion
May 15, 2023
Study Completion
May 15, 2023
Last Updated
July 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Undecided