Efficacy and Safety of 10-Week or Shorter vs 12-Week or Longer Injection Intervals of Botulinum Toxin
1 other identifier
observational
105
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Our hypothesis is that botulinum toxin injections (with onabotulinum toxin, incobotulinum toxin, and abobotulinum toxin) given at 10-week or shorter intervals for the indication of treatment of muscle spasms associated with neurological disorders are associated with equal safety and effectiveness as those given at 12-week or longer intervals. We also hypothesize that for those patients who would prefer a shorter inter-injection interval, but for whom their insurance carrier has prevented this, have worse health-related quality of life compared to patients who receive injections at a 10-week or shorter interval. We aim to investigate this hypothesis by collecting demographic and injection data and patient survey responses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Nov 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 2, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 4, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 7, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 14, 2022
CompletedJune 30, 2022
June 1, 2022
4 months
October 21, 2021
June 28, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Quality of Life measured by Short Form 36 (SF-36)
SF-36 HRQoL score as collected by a patient-completed survey (measured from 0 to 100 with a scoring system where 100 is best quality of life)
single measure at 1 day of enrollment
Safety of injection
Side effects recorded qualitatively and graded by severity (0 to 4 numerical subjective grade where 4 is most severe) by the injecting physician and attributed by that physician to the most recent injection
single measure at 1 day of enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Blepharospasm disability index survey (BSDI)
single measure at 1 day of enrollment
Cervicocranial dystonia questionnaire (CDQ24)
single measure at 1 day of enrollment
Arm Dystonia Disability Scale (ADDS)
single measure at 1 day of enrollment
Hemifacial Spasm Scale (HFS7)
single measure at 1 day of enrollment
Oromandibular dystonia questionnaire (OMDQ-25)
single measure at 1 day of enrollment
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
10 weeks or less
Patients receiving botulinum toxin injections at a frequency of 10 weeks or less
12 weeks or more
Patients receiving botulinum toxin injections at a frequency of 12 weeks or more
Eligibility Criteria
Patients will be recruited consecutively on presentation for treatment of muscle spasm due to neurological disease with botulinum toxin to the UT Southwestern Movement Disorders clinic by one of the investigators.
You may qualify if:
- Aim 1:
- Patient provides responses to an internet based survey which includes consent to participate
- Patient has been diagnosed with one or more of the conditions for which a HRQoL scale exists and will be employed in this study
- Patient has received at least 2 prior injections with botulinum toxin for that condition by one of the study investigators
- Both of the two most recent intervals between injections are either a) 10-weeks or less or b) 12-weeks or more
- Aim 2:
- Patient provides responses to an internet based survey which includes consent to participate
- Patient has been diagnosed with one or more of the conditions for which a HRQoL scale exists and will be employed in this study
- Patient has received at least 2 prior injections with botulinum toxin for that condition by one of the study investigators
- Both of the two most recent intervals between injections are either a) 10-weeks or less or b) 12-weeks or more
- If receiving injections at 12-weeks or more, notes must have previously indicated that patient needs an injection interval of 10-weeks or less
- If receiving injections at 12-weeks or more, the reason must be that the insurance carrier covering that patient's medical costs refused to allow a 10-week or less injection frequency
You may not qualify if:
- For both Aims 1 and 2:
- Patient is unwilling to consent to study procedures (refuses to fill out surveys)
- Patient has variable injection frequencies such that the two most recent injections do not both meet criteria of being 10-weeks or less in frequency or 12-weeks or more in frequency
- Patient has a diagnosis of and is being treated for a condition for which a HRQoL scale does not exist
- Patient has insufficient chart documentation to characterize demographics, diagnosis, toxin selected, dose used, and injection frequency employed
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Related Publications (14)
Simpson DM, Hallett M, Ashman EJ, Comella CL, Green MW, Gronseth GS, Armstrong MJ, Gloss D, Potrebic S, Jankovic J, Karp BP, Naumann M, So YT, Yablon SA. Practice guideline update summary: Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, adult spasticity, and headache [RETIRED]: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2016 May 10;86(19):1818-26. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002560. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
PMID: 27164716BACKGROUNDTan EK, Fook-Chong S, Lum SY, Thumboo J. Validation of a short disease specific quality of life scale for hemifacial spasm: correlation with SF-36. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;76(12):1707-10. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.065656.
PMID: 16291898BACKGROUNDWissel J. Towards flexible and tailored botulinum neurotoxin dosing regimens for focal dystonia and spasticity - Insights from recent studies. Toxicon. 2018 Jun 1;147:100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
PMID: 29407165BACKGROUNDTruong DD, Gollomp SM, Jankovic J, LeWitt PA, Marx M, Hanschmann A, Fernandez HH; Xeomin US Blepharospasm Study Group. Sustained efficacy and safety of repeated incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin((R))) injections in blepharospasm. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2013 Sep;120(9):1345-53. doi: 10.1007/s00702-013-0998-9. Epub 2013 Feb 23.
PMID: 23435927BACKGROUNDEvidente VG, Truong D, Jankovic J, Comella CL, Grafe S, Hanschmann A. IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin(R)) injected for blepharospasm or cervical dystonia according to patient needs is well tolerated. J Neurol Sci. 2014 Nov 15;346(1-2):116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
PMID: 25186131BACKGROUNDGreene P, Fahn S, Diamond B. Development of resistance to botulinum toxin type A in patients with torticollis. Mov Disord. 1994 Mar;9(2):213-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.870090216.
PMID: 8196686BACKGROUNDJankovic J, Vuong KD, Ahsan J. Comparison of efficacy and immunogenicity of original versus current botulinum toxin in cervical dystonia. Neurology. 2003 Apr 8;60(7):1186-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000055087.96356.bb.
PMID: 12682332BACKGROUNDRuta D, Garratt A, Abdalla M, Buckingham K, Russell I. The SF 36 health survey questionnaire. A valid measure of health status.. BMJ. 1993 Aug 14;307(6901):448-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.448-b. No abstract available.
PMID: 8374477BACKGROUNDJankovic J, Kenney C, Grafe S, Goertelmeyer R, Comes G. Relationship between various clinical outcome assessments in patients with blepharospasm. Mov Disord. 2009 Feb 15;24(3):407-13. doi: 10.1002/mds.22368.
PMID: 19053054BACKGROUNDMuller J, Wissel J, Kemmler G, Voller B, Bodner T, Schneider A, Wenning GK, Poewe W. Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24): development and validation of a disease-specific quality of life instrument. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 May;75(5):749-53. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.013441.
PMID: 15090572BACKGROUNDPeterson DA, Berque P, Jabusch HC, Altenmuller E, Frucht SJ. Rating scales for musician's dystonia: the state of the art. Neurology. 2013 Aug 6;81(6):589-98. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829e6f72. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
PMID: 23884039BACKGROUNDFahn, S., Assessment of the primary dystonias, in Quantification of Neurologic Deficit, M. TL, Editor. 1989, Butterworths: Oxford. p. 241-270.
BACKGROUNDMerz RI, Deakin J, Hawthorne MR. Oromandibular dystonia questionnaire (OMDQ-25): a valid and reliable instrument for measuring health-related quality of life. Clin Otolaryngol. 2010 Oct;35(5):390-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02194.x.
PMID: 21108749BACKGROUNDTurner-Stokes L, Ashford S, Jacinto J, Maisonobe P, Balcaitiene J, Fheodoroff K. Impact of integrated upper limb spasticity management including botulinum toxin A on patient-centred goal attainment: rationale and protocol for an international prospective, longitudinal cohort study (ULIS-III). BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 17;6(6):e011157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011157.
PMID: 27315835BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard B Dewey, Jr., MD
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Neurology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2021
First Posted
November 2, 2021
Study Start
November 4, 2021
Primary Completion
March 7, 2022
Study Completion
June 14, 2022
Last Updated
June 30, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share