PENG vs. FIC Block for Hip Fracture ED Patients
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block vs. the Fascia Iliaca Compartment (FIC) Block for Patients With Isolated Hip Fractures in the Emergency Department
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks are an important tool for treating pain due to orthopedic injury in the ED. They provide long lasting, opioid-sparing pain relief that is generally safe and well-tolerated by patients1. Elderly patients with hip fractures commonly present to the ED, and their injury can be painful. Commonly used opioid pain regimens can have deleterious side effects, especially in elderly patients, like somnolence, delirium, hypotension and respiratory depression. The fascia iliaca compartment (FIC) block has become a familiar technique to emergency physicians as a pain control treatment for hip fractures. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has recently been proposed as a novel method to treat pain due to hip, acetabular and pelvic fracture by targeting the terminal sensory articular nerve branches of the femoral nerve (FN), obturator nerve (ON), and accessory obturator nerve (AON). At this time there has been no study comparing the efficacy of the two nerve blocks, PENG and FIC. This aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the PENG block (20mL of Bupivacaine 0.50%) to that of the FIC block (40mL of Bupivacaine 0.25%) for patients with hip fractures in the ED. Our hypothesis is that PENG will demonstrate analgesia that is non-inferior to FIC. Subjective pain scores on a scale of 0 to 10 will be assessed before and after the block. All subjects will receive 4mg of morphine after consent and prior to the block.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain
Started Oct 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 2, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
September 25, 2025
September 1, 2025
4.7 years
October 20, 2021
September 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Score at 30 Minutes
The pain score at 11 point Likert Scale ranging 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain) at 30 minutes post nerve block procedure
30 minutes post administration of nerve block
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain Score at 60 minutes
60 minutes post administration of nerve block
Study Arms (2)
Fascia Iliaca Compartment
ACTIVE COMPARATORFascial Iliaca block (FIC) (40mL of Bupivacaine 0.25%) for patients with hip fractures in the ED
PENG Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block (20mL of Bupivacaine 0.50%)
Interventions
Ultrasound Guided Nerve Block for Hip Fracture Patients using the FIC Proceedure
Ultrasound Guided Nerve Block for Hip Fractures Patients using the PENG Procedure
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult Emergency Medicine Patients over 18 years of age
- Isolated hip fracture, intertrocanteric or more proximal
- Pain score 5 or greater on a scale of 0 to 10 just prior to nerve block placement
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with multi-system trauma
- People who are unable to communicate their level of pain\\
- Pregnant patients
- Pediatric Patients (less than 18 years of age)
- Intoxicated Patients
- Abnormal Vital Signs (HR\>120bpm, MAP \<65, Pulse Ox \<95%)
- Patients on long term systemic opioid analgesia
- Allergy to amide local anesthetics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maimonides Medical Center
Brooklyn, New York, 11209, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lawrence Haines, MD
Maimonides Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Administration Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2021
First Posted
November 2, 2021
Study Start
October 20, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
September 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share