Validation of Senofilcon A With New UV / HEV Filter
1 other identifier
interventional
296
1 country
17
Brief Summary
This is a bilateral, dispensing, randomized, controlled, subject-masked, 2-arm parallel study to evaluate safety and efficacy
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 29, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 24, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 24, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 6, 2023
CompletedFebruary 6, 2023
January 1, 2023
2 months
October 4, 2021
November 16, 2022
January 6, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Overall Quality of Vision Score
Overall quality of vision score was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experienceâ„¢ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE vision score for each lens type was reported.
2-Week Follow-up
Distance Monocular logMAR Visual Acuity
Monocular visual acuity was measured on a logMAR (Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution) scale and was evaluated at distance (4 meter) under high luminance high contrast lighting condition using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts. Letter-by-letter results calculated the visual performance score for each chart read. LogMAR scores closer to zero, or below zero, indicate a better visual acuity. A logMAR visual performance score of 0.0 is equivalent to Snellen visual acuity of 20/20.
2-Week Follow-up
Proportion of Eyes With Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings
Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). This was performed on each subject eye at every study visit (baseline, unscheduled visits, 2-week follow-up and final evaluation). The data was then dichotomized into two groups. Those with Grade 3 or higher SLF and those with Grade 2 or lower. The proportion of eyes with Grade 3 or higher SLF was reported.
up to 2-week follow-up
Proportion of Eyes With Unacceptable Lens Fitting
Contact lens fitting acceptance was assessed for each subject eye using a biomicroscope post lens insertion and the 2-week follow-up. Lens fit was a binary variable where acceptable lens fit=1 and unacceptable lens fit=0. The proportion of eyes with unacceptable lens fit was reported. Summaries presented in the Participant flow are summarized by planned arm, where as summaries for this measure are summarized by actual arm. One subject was dispensed the incorrect study lens, there for, the number of subjects that were randomized to the Control were 149 but 150 subjects were actually dispensed the control.
Up to 2-Week Follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Overall Comfort Scores
2-Week Follow-up
Overall Handling Scores
2-Week Follow-up
Situational Visual Performance - Indoors
2-Week Follow-up
Situational Visual Performance - Digital Devices
2-Week Follow-up
Study Arms (2)
TEST lens
EXPERIMENTALEligible subjects that are habitual wearers of silicone hydrogel spherical contact lenses will be randomized to the TEST Lens for the duration of the study.
CONTROL lens
ACTIVE COMPARATOREligible subjects that are habitual wearers of silicone hydrogel spherical contact lenses will be randomized to the CONTROL Lens for the duration of the study.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:
- Read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
- Appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
- Be between 18 and 39 (inclusive) years of age at the time of screening.
- By self-report, habitually wear spherical silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses in both eyes in a daily reusable or daily disposable wear modality (i.e. not extended wear modality). Habitual wear is defined as a minimum of 6 hours of wear per day, for a minimum of 5 days per week during the past 30 days.
- Have a habitual contact lens prescription that is current within the prior 6 months, and they must have worn that prescription for at least 2 weeks prior to entering the study.
- The subject's vertex corrected spherical equivalent distance refraction must be in the range of -1.00 through -6.00 D in both eyes.
- The subject's refractive cylinder must be 1.00 D or less.
- The subject must have best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye.
You may not qualify if:
- Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:
- Be currently pregnant or lactating.
- Have any ocular or systemic allergies or diseases that may interfere with contact lens wear.
- Have any autoimmune disease or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear. Habitual medications used by successful soft contact lens wearers are considered acceptable.
- Have any previous, or planned, ocular or interocular surgery (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.).
- Be currently wearing lenses in a monovision, multifocal, toric, or extended wear modality.
- Have participated in a contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 14 days prior to study enrollment
- Be an employee (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician) or immediate family member of an employee (including partner, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild or sibling of the employee or their spouse) of the clinical site.
- Have a history of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus.
- Have any infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or contagious immunosuppressive diseases (e.g., HIV) by self-report. 10. Have any Grade 3 or greater slit lamp findings (e.g., edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection) on the FDA classification scale, any previous history or signs of a contact lens-related corneal inflammatory event (e.g., past peripheral ulcer or round peripheral scar), or any other ocular abnormality that may contraindicate contact lens wear.
- \. Have any ocular infection. 12. Have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear.
- \. Have entropion, ectropion, extrusions, chalazia, recurrent styes, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, or aphakia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (17)
James T. Fujimoto, O.D.
Cupertino, California, 95014, United States
Randall Go, OD
San Francisco, California, 94110, United States
Dr. James Weber & Associates, PA
Jacksonville, Florida, 32205, United States
Sabal Eye Care
Longwood, Florida, 32779, United States
Flora Chen Poveda, OD, PA
Orange Park, Florida, 32073, United States
Tallahassee Eye Center
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308, United States
VisualEyes, Inc
Roswell, Georgia, 30076, United States
Kannarr Eye Care
Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762, United States
Birmingham Vision Care
Bloomfield Township, Michigan, 48301, United States
Dr. Debbie H. Kim, OD
Closter, New Jersey, 07624, United States
Sacco Eye Group
Vestal, New York, 13850, United States
Professional Vision Care, Inc.
Westerville, Ohio, 43081, United States
West Bay Eye Associates
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02888, United States
Primary Eyecare Group
Brentwood, Tennessee, 37027, United States
Tyler Eye Associates
Tyler, Texas, 75703, United States
William J. Bogus, OD, FAAO
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106, United States
Botetourt Eyecare, LLC
Salem, Virginia, 24153, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- John R. Buch-Sr. Principal Research Optometrist
- Organization
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Clinical Trial
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2021
First Posted
October 29, 2021
Study Start
October 5, 2021
Primary Completion
November 24, 2021
Study Completion
November 24, 2021
Last Updated
February 6, 2023
Results First Posted
February 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Johnson \& Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu