NCT05099380

Brief Summary

This is a bilateral, dispensing, randomized, controlled, subject-masked, 2-arm parallel study to evaluate safety and efficacy

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
296

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

17 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 4, 2021

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 5, 2021

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 29, 2021

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 24, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 24, 2021

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 6, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

February 6, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

October 4, 2021

Results QC Date

November 16, 2022

Last Update Submit

January 6, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Overall Quality of Vision Score

    Overall quality of vision score was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experienceâ„¢ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE vision score for each lens type was reported.

    2-Week Follow-up

  • Distance Monocular logMAR Visual Acuity

    Monocular visual acuity was measured on a logMAR (Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution) scale and was evaluated at distance (4 meter) under high luminance high contrast lighting condition using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts. Letter-by-letter results calculated the visual performance score for each chart read. LogMAR scores closer to zero, or below zero, indicate a better visual acuity. A logMAR visual performance score of 0.0 is equivalent to Snellen visual acuity of 20/20.

    2-Week Follow-up

  • Proportion of Eyes With Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings

    Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). This was performed on each subject eye at every study visit (baseline, unscheduled visits, 2-week follow-up and final evaluation). The data was then dichotomized into two groups. Those with Grade 3 or higher SLF and those with Grade 2 or lower. The proportion of eyes with Grade 3 or higher SLF was reported.

    up to 2-week follow-up

  • Proportion of Eyes With Unacceptable Lens Fitting

    Contact lens fitting acceptance was assessed for each subject eye using a biomicroscope post lens insertion and the 2-week follow-up. Lens fit was a binary variable where acceptable lens fit=1 and unacceptable lens fit=0. The proportion of eyes with unacceptable lens fit was reported. Summaries presented in the Participant flow are summarized by planned arm, where as summaries for this measure are summarized by actual arm. One subject was dispensed the incorrect study lens, there for, the number of subjects that were randomized to the Control were 149 but 150 subjects were actually dispensed the control.

    Up to 2-Week Follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Overall Comfort Scores

    2-Week Follow-up

  • Overall Handling Scores

    2-Week Follow-up

  • Situational Visual Performance - Indoors

    2-Week Follow-up

  • Situational Visual Performance - Digital Devices

    2-Week Follow-up

Study Arms (2)

TEST lens

EXPERIMENTAL

Eligible subjects that are habitual wearers of silicone hydrogel spherical contact lenses will be randomized to the TEST Lens for the duration of the study.

Device: senofilcon A C3

CONTROL lens

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Eligible subjects that are habitual wearers of silicone hydrogel spherical contact lenses will be randomized to the CONTROL Lens for the duration of the study.

Device: senofilcon A

Interventions

TEST Lens

TEST lens

CONTROL Lens

CONTROL lens

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 39 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:
  • Read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
  • Appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
  • Be between 18 and 39 (inclusive) years of age at the time of screening.
  • By self-report, habitually wear spherical silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses in both eyes in a daily reusable or daily disposable wear modality (i.e. not extended wear modality). Habitual wear is defined as a minimum of 6 hours of wear per day, for a minimum of 5 days per week during the past 30 days.
  • Have a habitual contact lens prescription that is current within the prior 6 months, and they must have worn that prescription for at least 2 weeks prior to entering the study.
  • The subject's vertex corrected spherical equivalent distance refraction must be in the range of -1.00 through -6.00 D in both eyes.
  • The subject's refractive cylinder must be 1.00 D or less.
  • The subject must have best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye.

You may not qualify if:

  • Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:
  • Be currently pregnant or lactating.
  • Have any ocular or systemic allergies or diseases that may interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Have any autoimmune disease or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear. Habitual medications used by successful soft contact lens wearers are considered acceptable.
  • Have any previous, or planned, ocular or interocular surgery (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.).
  • Be currently wearing lenses in a monovision, multifocal, toric, or extended wear modality.
  • Have participated in a contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 14 days prior to study enrollment
  • Be an employee (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician) or immediate family member of an employee (including partner, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild or sibling of the employee or their spouse) of the clinical site.
  • Have a history of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus.
  • Have any infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or contagious immunosuppressive diseases (e.g., HIV) by self-report. 10. Have any Grade 3 or greater slit lamp findings (e.g., edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection) on the FDA classification scale, any previous history or signs of a contact lens-related corneal inflammatory event (e.g., past peripheral ulcer or round peripheral scar), or any other ocular abnormality that may contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • \. Have any ocular infection. 12. Have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear.
  • \. Have entropion, ectropion, extrusions, chalazia, recurrent styes, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, or aphakia.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (17)

James T. Fujimoto, O.D.

Cupertino, California, 95014, United States

Location

Randall Go, OD

San Francisco, California, 94110, United States

Location

Dr. James Weber & Associates, PA

Jacksonville, Florida, 32205, United States

Location

Sabal Eye Care

Longwood, Florida, 32779, United States

Location

Flora Chen Poveda, OD, PA

Orange Park, Florida, 32073, United States

Location

Tallahassee Eye Center

Tallahassee, Florida, 32308, United States

Location

VisualEyes, Inc

Roswell, Georgia, 30076, United States

Location

Kannarr Eye Care

Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762, United States

Location

Birmingham Vision Care

Bloomfield Township, Michigan, 48301, United States

Location

Dr. Debbie H. Kim, OD

Closter, New Jersey, 07624, United States

Location

Sacco Eye Group

Vestal, New York, 13850, United States

Location

Professional Vision Care, Inc.

Westerville, Ohio, 43081, United States

Location

West Bay Eye Associates

Warwick, Rhode Island, 02888, United States

Location

Primary Eyecare Group

Brentwood, Tennessee, 37027, United States

Location

Tyler Eye Associates

Tyler, Texas, 75703, United States

Location

William J. Bogus, OD, FAAO

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106, United States

Location

Botetourt Eyecare, LLC

Salem, Virginia, 24153, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
John R. Buch-Sr. Principal Research Optometrist
Organization
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Clinical Trial

    Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2021

First Posted

October 29, 2021

Study Start

October 5, 2021

Primary Completion

November 24, 2021

Study Completion

November 24, 2021

Last Updated

February 6, 2023

Results First Posted

February 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Johnson \& Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu

More information

Locations