NCT05099250

Brief Summary

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed minimally invasive surgical procedures for the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has clear benefits when compared with open surgery, but post-operative pain is still a common complaint after it The patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy suffers from severe post-operative pain, it can prolong hospital stay and lead to increased morbidity Post-operative laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain can be relieved by some methods pre-emptive analgesic regimens containing ketamine, regional anesthesia techniques including paravertebral block Paravertebral Block is a regional anesthetic and analgesic technique which may offer comparable analgesic effectiveness with minimal side effects Paravertebral Block has been used a lot in the last two decades, several studies show its efficacy in, thoracoscopic surgery and laparoscopic cholecystectomy .Paravertebral block is the technique of injecting local anesthetic adjacent to the thoracic vertebra close to where the spinal nerves emerge from the intervertebral foramina, resulting in ipsilateral somatic and sympathetic nerve blockade in multiple dermatomes above and below the site of injection . Bupivacaine is a local anesthetic that is capable of producing prolonged high quality analgesia in the postoperative period It is shown that paravertebral block using bupivacaine significantly reduces pain score Many drugs have been used as adjuvants to local anesthetic in peripheral nerve block in order to augment its analgesic effect and prolong the duration of the block such as opioids and magnesium sulfate Many studies have reported safety and efficacy of adding magnesium to local anesthetics in various regional anesthetic procedures, such as intrathecal, epidural, caudal, brachial plexus blocks and intravenous regional anesthesia. Magnesium play a major role in central nociceptive transmission, modulation and sensitization of acute and chronic pain states due to its antagonistic effect on N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors .

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 15, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 10, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 19, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 29, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

November 8, 2021

Status Verified

October 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

August 19, 2021

Last Update Submit

October 31, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

paravertebral block laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • change of postoperative pain intensity

    measured by visual analogue scale . All patients were familiar with the use of 0 -10 visual analogue scale identifying 0 as no pain and 10 as worst imaginable pain. Pain intensity was assessed at rest and during cough with VAS score at 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. When the patients experienced pain (VAS score \> 3), A bolus dose of IV morphine 0.02 mg/kg was administered till visual analogue scale score ≤ 4 was attained.

    first 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • change opioid consumption in first 24 hours

    first 24 hours postoperatively

  • change of analgesia duration

    first 24 hours postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Control group: Bupivacaine Group (B group)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Included patients who received 17 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 3 mL saline 0.9% in a total volume of 20 ml on each side

Drug: BupivacainOther: saline

Magnesium Group (M group)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Included patients who received 17 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 3 mL of 75 mg magnesium sulfate diluted in 0.9% saline in a total volume of 20 ml on each side.

Drug: BupivacainDrug: magnesium sulfateOther: saline

Interventions

local anesthetic agent

Also known as: Control group: Bupivacaine Group (B group, Saline
Control group: Bupivacaine Group (B group)Magnesium Group (M group)

In the central nervous system , it has depressant effects, by antagonism at NMDA receptors and through inhibition of release of catecholamines

Also known as: Magnesium Group (M group), saline
Magnesium Group (M group)
salineOTHER

medical solution

Control group: Bupivacaine Group (B group)Magnesium Group (M group)

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in this study

You may not qualify if:

  • patient refusal to participate,
  • Sever renal or cardiac illness,
  • Pulmonary diseases as emphysema or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Neuromuscular diseases (as myopathies and myasthenia gravies), -Hematological diseases, bleeding or coagulation abnormality,
  • Psychiatric diseases,
  • Local skin infection and sepsis at site of the block,
  • Known hypersensitivity to the study drugs, and Severe chest wall deformity, e.g. scoliosis.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Marwa Ibrahim Mohamed Abdo

Al Mansurah, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Agarwal A, Batra RK, Chhabra A, Subramaniam R, Misra MC. The evaluation of efficacy and safety of paravertebral block for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012 Oct-Dec;6(4):344-9. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.105860.

    PMID: 23493523BACKGROUND
  • Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain. 2001 Feb 15;90(3):261-269. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00406-1.

    PMID: 11207398BACKGROUND
  • Lau H, Brooks DC. Predictive factors for unanticipated admissions after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 2001 Oct;136(10):1150-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.10.1150.

    PMID: 11585507BACKGROUND
  • Salihoglu Z, Yildirim M, Demiroluk S, Kaya G, Karatas A, Ertem M, Aytac E. Evaluation of intravenous paracetamol administration on postoperative pain and recovery characteristics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Aug;19(4):321-3. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181b13933.

    PMID: 19692881BACKGROUND
  • Davies RG, Myles PS, Graham JM. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Apr;96(4):418-26. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael020. Epub 2006 Feb 13.

    PMID: 16476698BACKGROUND
  • Klein SM, Bergh A, Steele SM, Georgiade GS, Greengrass RA. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jun;90(6):1402-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200006000-00026.

    PMID: 10825328BACKGROUND
  • Soni AK, Conacher ID, Waller DA, Hilton CJ. Video-assisted thoracoscopic placement of paravertebral catheters: a technique for postoperative analgesia for bilateral thoracoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1994 Apr;72(4):462-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/72.4.462.

    PMID: 8155453BACKGROUND
  • Cheema SP, Ilsley D, Richardson J, Sabanathan S. A thermographic study of paravertebral analgesia. Anaesthesia. 1995 Feb;50(2):118-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb15092.x.

    PMID: 7710020BACKGROUND
  • Kopacz DJ, Allen HW, Thompson GE. A comparison of epidural levobupivacaine 0.75% with racemic bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000 Mar;90(3):642-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00026.

    PMID: 10702451BACKGROUND
  • Bilgin M, Akcali Y, Oguzkaya F. Extrapleural regional versus systemic analgesia for relieving postthoracotomy pain: a clinical study of bupivacaine compared with metamizol. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Nov;126(5):1580-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00701-3.

    PMID: 14666036BACKGROUND
  • Akhondzade R, Nesioonpour S, Gousheh M, Soltani F, Davarimoghadam M. The Effect of Magnesium Sulfate on Postoperative Pain in Upper Limb Surgeries by Supraclavicular Block Under Ultrasound Guidance. Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jun 10;7(3):e14232. doi: 10.5812/aapm.14232. eCollection 2017 Jun.

    PMID: 28924560BACKGROUND
  • Lee AR, Yi HW, Chung IS, Ko JS, Ahn HJ, Gwak MS, Choi DH, Choi SJ. Magnesium added to bupivacaine prolongs the duration of analgesia after interscalene nerve block. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;59(1):21-7. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9604-5. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

    PMID: 22012543BACKGROUND
  • Choyce A, Peng P. A systematic review of adjuncts for intravenous regional anesthesia for surgical procedures. Can J Anaesth. 2002 Jan;49(1):32-45. doi: 10.1007/BF03020416.

    PMID: 11782326BACKGROUND
  • Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

    PMID: 16320034BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

BupivacaineSodium ChlorideMagnesium Sulfate

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium CompoundsMagnesium CompoundsSulfatesSulfuric AcidsSulfur AcidsSulfur Compounds

Study Officials

  • Ghada Fa Al-Rahamawy, MD

    Professor of Anesthesia - Intensive Care Faculty of Medicine - Mansoura University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Hesham Ah Abdel Mohaiemn, MD

    Assistant Professor of Anesthesia - Intensive Care Faculty of Medicine - Mansoura University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Marwa Ib Abdo, MD

    Lecturer of Anesthesia Intensive Care Faculty of Medicine - Mansoura University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Asmaa Ah Hossain, Ph.D

    Residant in Anesthesia - Intensive Care Faculty of Medicine - Mansoura University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The groups allocated are concealed in sealed opaque envelopes which were not opened until patient consent was obtained. The two groups were: 1. Control group: Bupivacaine Group (B group) N=25 : Included patients who received 17 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 3 mL saline 0.9% in a total volume of 20 ml on each side. 2. Magnesium Group (M group) N=25 : Included patients who received 17 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 3 mL of 75 mg magnesium sulfate diluted in 0.9% saline in a total volume of 20 ml on each side. All patients were performed by the same anesthetic team with standard procedure.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: The groups allocated are concealed in sealed opaque envelopes which were not opened until patient consent was obtained. The two groups were: 1. Control group: Bupivacaine Group (B group) N=25 : Included patients who received 17 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 3 mL saline 0.9% in a total volume of 20 ml on each side. 2. Magnesium Group (M group) N=25 : Included patients who received 17 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 3 mL of 75 mg magnesium sulfate diluted in 0.9% saline in a total volume of 20 ml on each side. All patients were performed by the same anesthetic team with standard procedure.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care-Faculty of Medicine - Mansoura University

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2021

First Posted

October 29, 2021

Study Start

July 15, 2019

Primary Completion

September 10, 2020

Study Completion

February 15, 2021

Last Updated

November 8, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations