Suction Mini-PCNL Versus Standard PCNL for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
Suction Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of 2-4 cm Kidney Stones: Study Protocol for an International, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
960
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is recommended as the first-line treatment choice for kidney stones larger than 2cm in international guidelines . However, tract-related complications affecting renal parenchymal and blood vessels have always been a concern . The mini-PCNL technique which uses a smaller tract (≤18 Fr) has been introduced to decrease tract-related complications . Nevertheless, the smaller mini-PCNL tract necessitates fragmentationi of stones into smaller pieces before extraction, potentially prolonging the operative time. Additionally, higher pressure irrigation is often required to flush out fragments by vacuum cleaner effect. If the drainage of irrigation fluid is insufficient via a smaller tract, the intrarenal pressure (IRP) may build up, leading to pyelovenous backflow and infectious complications. Suction application in mini-PCNL has the potential to enhance stone fragments removal efficiency, maintain low IRP, and decrease potential postoperative infection complications. In the pre-suction era, mini-PCNL achieved noninferior stone-free rates (SFR) and operative times compared to standard PCNL, along with benefits of reduced bleeding, less postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stay. However, high-level evidence regarding whether suction mini-PCNL can attain comparable outcomes to standard PCNL is still lacking. Therefore, we have designed this multicenter, international, randomized controlled noninferiority trial comparing suction mini-PCNL with standard PCNL in the management of 2-4 cm kidney stones.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedJune 30, 2026
June 1, 2026
3.8 years
October 3, 2021
June 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Stone free rate (SFR)
Immediate postoperative SFR is defined as the absence of residual stone or fragments \<2 mm on low-dose NCCT scan within 72 h after operation.
72 hours after operation
Operation time
Operative time is defined as the time from percutaneous puncture to completion of double-J or nephrostomy tube placement.
the time from percutaneous puncture to completion of double-J or nephrostomy tube placement
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Final SFR
1 month post intervention
Pain VAS score
VAS is evaluated at three time points, namely pre-operatively, post-operatively 6 hours and 24 hours respectively.
Length of hospital stay
from the day of surgery to the day of discharge
Postoperative complications
up to 1 month post intervention
Quality of Life (QoL)
preoperatively and at 1 month postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Patients in Group 1 undergo suction mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy
EXPERIMENTALPatients in Group 2 undergo standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
For standard PCNL, 24Fr sheath will be inserted, and 20Fr nephroscope (Richard Wolf, Germany) will be used. Renal stones will be fragmented and aspirated using an ultrasonic-lithotripter (LithoClast Master, EMS or ShockPluse-SE, Olympus).
For suction mini-PCNL, 18Fr suction sheath (Wellead, China) will be inserted, and 12Fr mini-nephroscope will be used. Renal stones will be fragmented by pneumatic lithotriptor or Ho:YAG laser (1.0-2.0J ×20-30Hz), and stone fragments will be aspirated out via the suction sheath.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18-70 years.
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score of 1-2.
- Kidney stones measuring 2-4 cm in diameter on non-contrast computer tomography.
- Ability to provide written informed consent and adhere to trial requirements.
You may not qualify if:
- Anatomy abnormalities, such as urinary diversion, horseshoe kidney, transplanted kidney, or ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
- Untreated acute urinary tract infection (UTI).
- Patients on anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy, or with uncorrected coagulopathies.
- Patients who decline trial enrolment or cannot adhere to trial requirements.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical Universitylead
- Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center, Manila, Philippines.collaborator
- Zunyi Medical Collegecollaborator
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Universitycollaborator
- Renmin Hospital of Wuhan Universitycollaborator
- ZhuHai Hospitalcollaborator
- Guizhou Provincial People's Hospitalcollaborator
- Shufu People's Hospital, Kashgar Prefecture, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Regioncollaborator
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou Universitycollaborator
- Chinese University of Hong Kongcollaborator
- Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicinecollaborator
- Shenzhen University General Hospitalcollaborator
- Hunan Provincial People' s Hospitalcollaborator
- Huamei hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciencescollaborator
- Affliliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical Universitycollaborator
- The First People's Hospital of Fuquan Citycollaborator
- Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture Hospitalcollaborator
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow Universitycollaborator
- University of Milan - Fondazione Ca'Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano Italycollaborator
- Sabah Al-Ahmad Urology Centre, Kuwait City, Kuwaitcollaborator
- Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgariacollaborator
- Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Swedencollaborator
- University College London Hospitalscollaborator
- European Association of Urology Section of Endourology (ESEUT), Arnhem, The Netherlandscollaborator
- Central Hospital of Xiangtancollaborator
- Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USAcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Urology, Minimally invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510230, China
Related Publications (3)
Zeng G, Cai C, Duan X, Xu X, Mao H, Li X, Nie Y, Xie J, Li J, Lu J, Zou X, Mo J, Li C, Li J, Wang W, Yu Y, Fei X, Gu X, Chen J, Kong X, Pang J, Zhu W, Zhao Z, Wu W, Sun H, Liu Y, la Rosette J. Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Is a Noninferior Modality to Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of 20-40mm Renal Calculi: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.026. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
PMID: 32994063RESULTZhong W, Wen J, Peng L, Zeng G. Enhanced super-mini-PCNL (eSMP): low renal pelvic pressure and high stone removal efficiency in a prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Urol. 2021 Mar;39(3):929-934. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03263-3. Epub 2020 May 26.
PMID: 32458093RESULTZhong W, Jiang K, Zhang X, Leung CH, Zhu W, Xu Z, Pang G, Sun Z, Cheng F, Li J, Chen J, Li Y, Yang H, Chen S, Wu C, Jia R, Zhu J, Gutierrez-Aceves J, Montanari E, Almousawi S, Saltirov I, Popiolek M, Aquino A, Mazzon G, Choong S, Xi H, Yuen SKK, Zeng G. Suction mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of 2-4 cm kidney stones: study protocol for an international, multicenter, parallel-group, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial. World J Urol. 2026 Feb 26;44(1):206. doi: 10.1007/s00345-026-06302-7.
PMID: 41746369DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Guohua Zeng, Ph.D & MD
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Vice president
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2021
First Posted
October 21, 2021
Study Start
December 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
June 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06