Comparison of Techniques in Repair of Unilateral Cleft Lip
Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair: Quantitative (Anthropometric) Comparative Assessment of Modified Millard vs Tennison-Randall Techniques.
1 other identifier
interventional
68
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Over the past century, there have been major advances in unilateral cleft-lip repair techniques toward the method's modern form. The first documented cleft-lip repair involved simple freshening and approximation of the cut cleft edges, followed by the use of curved incisions to allow lengthening of the lip. Straight-line closure repairs were used in the early 1900; however, straight-line closures had the disadvantage of creating a vertical scar contracture, leading to notching of the lip. This led to the development of several methods in the mid-twentieth century that are grouped as quadrangular flaps, triangular flaps, and rotation-advancement techniques. The two basic techniques that are most commonly used for unilateral cleft lip (UCL) closure are the Tennison-Randall and the Millard rotation\_advancement techniques. both techniques address the importance of repositioning the lip muscle (orbicularis oris) in the correct anatomic orientation for optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes. The ultimate goal of cleft lip surgery is to achieve a perfectly symmetrical lip and nose. It has been shown that for the general population, the more symmetrical the face, the more attractive the face is. The appearance and symmetry of the nasolabial region is also seen as one of the most important characteristics when evaluating the results of any facial surgery. Measurement of treatment outcome is vital to evaluate the success of cleft management and the degree of improvement, especially in the present age of evidence-based medicine where treatment guidelines for best practice are becoming an integral part of contemporary clinical practice. The good goal of cleft lip repair is a symmetrical and balanced lip with minimal scar restoring the natural contours of the face, as well as correcting functional anatomy. Objectives To evaluate the quantitative (anthropometric) assessment of modified Millard technique in comparison to Tennison\_ Randall technique in unilateral cleft lip (ucl) repair.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 5, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2021
CompletedOctober 18, 2021
September 1, 2021
1.4 years
September 28, 2021
October 4, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of Post-operative Complications
Early: Wound infection. Wound dehiscence. Late: Wound scarring. Lip notch
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Anthropometry assessment of Cosmetic Results
patients were assessed before the operation and followed for 3-4 weeks after.
Satisfaction score
24 hours after the operation
Operative time
intraoperatively
Study Arms (2)
the cleft lip will be repaired by modified Millard technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the modified Millard technique, points (nasal and Vermilion border points) and lines (rotational and advancement flap lines and mucosal lines) were drawn. Then, we cut the submucosal layer and created three flaps: advancement flap, rotational flap, and c flap. The orbicular muscle was dissected and freed from the columellar base on the non-cleft side and from the alar base on the cleft side. Using a vicryl 5-0, we sutured the anterior nasal floor; then, using vicryl 4-0, we sutured the alar base and muscle. Using vicryl 6-0, we sutured top of philtral column with point a, the peak of Cupid's bow, and tip of c flap with alar base. The suturing of mucosal lip was carried out using a vicryl 5-0.
the cleft lip will be repaired by Tennison-Randall technique.
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the Tennison-Randall technique, points (nasal and Vermilion border points) and lines (Skin triangle flap lines and mucosal lines) were drawn. Then, we cut the submucosal layer and created equilateral triangle flap and releasing incision. The orbicular muscle was dissected and freed from the columellar base on the non-cleft side and from the alar base on the cleft side. The suturing of the anterior nasal floor, alar base, and muscle followed the same principles of the modified Millard technique. The cutaneous repair was done by suturing the top of philtral column, the peak of Cupid's bow, point a, the line between the top of philtral column and the peak of Cupid's bow with b-8 and 3-a with b-a.
Interventions
evaluate the quantitative (anthropometric) assessment of modified Millard technique in comparison to Tennison-Randall technique in unilateral cleft lip (ucl) repair. Inclusion criteria: Patient with ages from 2 months old to 6 months old, Patient with unilateral cleft lip complete or incomplete type.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with age from 2 months old to 6 months old.
- Patient with unilateral cleft lip complete or incomplete type.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with age less than 2 months old or more than 6 months old.
- Patients with bilateral cleft lip
- Patients with recurrent cleft lip.
- Patients with associated major congenital anomalies like major cardiac anomalies.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Pediatric Surgery department, Cairo University
Cairo, 11311, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Faculty of Pediatric Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2021
First Posted
October 18, 2021
Study Start
June 5, 2018
Primary Completion
November 10, 2019
Study Completion
February 5, 2020
Last Updated
October 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share