PEEK Retentive Elements Versus Conventional
PEEK
Novel PEEK Retentive Elements Versus Conventional Retentive Elements in Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
comparing retention and patient satisfaction of implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained by conventional nylon clip and metal housings for ball attachments versus PEEK clip and housings
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 15, 2021
CompletedOctober 15, 2021
October 1, 2021
1.8 years
July 5, 2021
October 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
retention
measuring retention force of retentive elements using The force-meter machine (Eagle: ELT 3000) . Gradual pulling up force was applied. The record appeared at the screen of the force meter was recorded as it's single-blind measurements.
3 months to six months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
patient satisfaction
3 months to six months
Study Arms (2)
conventional retentive element
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe conventional group received implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained by metal housings and nylon retentive elements,
PEEK retentive element
EXPERIMENTALPEEK group received implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained by PEEK housings ,
Interventions
received implant-supported mandibular overdenture retained by PEEK retentive element and housings
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- edentulous class I or II PDI classification no neuromuscular disordersand temporomandibular joint disorders
You may not qualify if:
- exposed to radiotherapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Mohamed Sharaf
Banī Suwayf, 11625, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Sharaf MY, Eskander A, Afify MA. Novel PEEK Retentive Elements versus Conventional Retentive Elements in Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Dent. 2022 Feb 28;2022:6947756. doi: 10.1155/2022/6947756. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35265135DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2021
First Posted
October 15, 2021
Study Start
July 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 1, 2019
Study Completion
November 30, 2019
Last Updated
October 15, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10