NCT05071352

Brief Summary

The aim of this prospective, randomized, active control, double blinded study is to assess the effect and safety of continuous infusion nefopam in mechanically ventilated ICU patients compared to standard of care. It is being hypothesized that continuous infusion nefopam will reduce opioid use with acceptable safety profile compared to standard of care.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 4, 2021

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2021

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 8, 2021

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

September 4, 2021

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Nefopam, Ketamine, Standard of care, Sedation, Critically ill, Mechanical ventilation, Propofol, Fentanyl, Midazolam, Delirium, Vasopressors.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cumulative dose of fentanyl

    To compare the cumulative dose of fentanyl

    First 24 hour after randomization.

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Richmond Agitation and Sedation Score (RASS)

    First 24 hours after randomization.

  • pain score

    First 24 hours after randomization.

  • Duration of mechanical ventilation (MV)

    The number of calendar days from intubation date to extubation date, until ICU discharge, death, or 28 days post-randomization, whichever comes first.

  • vasopressor requirements

    First 24 hours after randomization.

  • Hemodynamics

    First 24 hours after randomization.

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Nefopam group

EXPERIMENTAL

Adjunct continuous infusion of nefopam plus standard of care in ICU for assessment and management of pain, sedation, and delirium. Nefopam will be administered as an initial dose of 20 mg IV dose infused over 15 minutes then, as continuous infusion of 5 mg/hr for 24 hours.

Drug: NefopamDrug: Standard of care in the ICU for assessment and management of pain, sedation, and delirium.

Control group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Standard of care in the ICU for assessment and management of pain, sedation, and delirium.

Drug: Standard of care in the ICU for assessment and management of pain, sedation, and delirium.

Interventions

Nefopam will be administered as an initial dose of 20 mg IV dose infused over 15 minutes then, as continuous infusion of 5 mg/hr for 24 hours.

Also known as: Acupan
Nefopam group

In our protocol we use analgiosedation approach (an opioid is used before a sedative to reach the sedation goal), targeting light sedation using richmond agitation sedation scale (RASS) score -1 to 0, and assess delirium using confusion assessment method for the ICU (CAM-ICU).

Also known as: Standard of care
Control groupNefopam group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients \>18 years on mechanical ventilation and expected to need ventilatory support for the next 24 hours.
  • Candidate for sedation and analgesia protocol

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant and/or lactating woman.
  • Has been intubated for duration longer than 12 hours in an intensive care unit.
  • Proven or suspected acute primary brain lesion such as traumatic brain injury, intracranial haemorrhage, stroke, or hypoxic brain injury.
  • Proven or suspected spinal cord injury or other pathology that may result in permanent or prolonged weakness.
  • Admission as a consequence of a suspected or proven drug overdose
  • Mean arterial pressure (MAP) \< 50 mmHg despite adequate resuscitation and vasopressor therapy at time of randomization.
  • Death is deemed to be imminent or inevitable during this admission and either the attending physician, patient or substitute decision maker is not committed to active treatment.
  • Patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C) or end stage renal disease (ESRD) (creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min or on chronic hemodialysis) due to altered pharmacokinetics \[20\].
  • Need for deep sedation such as administration of neuromuscular blockers.
  • Convulsions or previous history of convulsions.
  • Risk of urinary retention linked to uretroprostatic disorders.
  • Risk of acute angle glaucoma.
  • Known intolerance of or hypersensitivity to study medications or constituents.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cairo University Hospitals (Kasr Alainy)

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (23)

  • Loeser JD, Treede RD. The Kyoto protocol of IASP Basic Pain Terminology. Pain. 2008 Jul 31;137(3):473-477. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.025. Epub 2008 Jun 25. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18583048BACKGROUND
  • Chanques G, Sebbane M, Barbotte E, Viel E, Eledjam JJ, Jaber S. A prospective study of pain at rest: incidence and characteristics of an unrecognized symptom in surgical and trauma versus medical intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology. 2007 Nov;107(5):858-60. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000287211.98642.51. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18073576BACKGROUND
  • Puntillo KA, Max A, Timsit JF, Vignoud L, Chanques G, Robleda G, Roche-Campo F, Mancebo J, Divatia JV, Soares M, Ionescu DC, Grintescu IM, Vasiliu IL, Maggiore SM, Rusinova K, Owczuk R, Egerod I, Papathanassoglou ED, Kyranou M, Joynt GM, Burghi G, Freebairn RC, Ho KM, Kaarlola A, Gerritsen RT, Kesecioglu J, Sulaj MM, Norrenberg M, Benoit DD, Seha MS, Hennein A, Periera FJ, Benbenishty JS, Abroug F, Aquilina A, Monte JR, An Y, Azoulay E. Determinants of procedural pain intensity in the intensive care unit. The Europain(R) study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Jan 1;189(1):39-47. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201306-1174OC.

    PMID: 24262016BACKGROUND
  • Chapman CR, Tuckett RP, Song CW. Pain and stress in a systems perspective: reciprocal neural, endocrine, and immune interactions. J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):122-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.006. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

    PMID: 18088561BACKGROUND
  • Tennant F. The physiologic effects of pain on the endocrine system. Pain Ther. 2013 Dec;2(2):75-86. doi: 10.1007/s40122-013-0015-x. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

    PMID: 25135146BACKGROUND
  • Sigakis MJ, Bittner EA. Ten Myths and Misconceptions Regarding Pain Management in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2468-78. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001256.

    PMID: 26308433BACKGROUND
  • Chanques G, Viel E, Constantin JM, Jung B, de Lattre S, Carr J, Cisse M, Lefrant JY, Jaber S. The measurement of pain in intensive care unit: comparison of 5 self-report intensity scales. Pain. 2010 Dec;151(3):711-721. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.039. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

    PMID: 20843604BACKGROUND
  • Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, Watson PL, Weinhouse GL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Balas MC, van den Boogaard M, Bosma KJ, Brummel NE, Chanques G, Denehy L, Drouot X, Fraser GL, Harris JE, Joffe AM, Kho ME, Kress JP, Lanphere JA, McKinley S, Neufeld KJ, Pisani MA, Payen JF, Pun BT, Puntillo KA, Riker RR, Robinson BRH, Shehabi Y, Szumita PM, Winkelman C, Centofanti JE, Price C, Nikayin S, Misak CJ, Flood PD, Kiedrowski K, Alhazzani W. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.

    PMID: 30113379BACKGROUND
  • Gelinas C, Fillion L, Puntillo KA, Viens C, Fortier M. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients. Am J Crit Care. 2006 Jul;15(4):420-7.

    PMID: 16823021BACKGROUND
  • Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, Buenaventura R, Adlaka R, Sehgal N, Glaser SE, Vallejo R. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician. 2008 Mar;11(2 Suppl):S105-20.

    PMID: 18443635BACKGROUND
  • Wibbenmeyer L, Sevier A, Liao J, Williams I, Light T, Latenser B, Lewis R 2nd, Kealey P, Rosenquist R. The impact of opioid administration on resuscitation volumes in thermally injured patients. J Burn Care Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1):48-56. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181c7ed30.

    PMID: 20061837BACKGROUND
  • Kohler M, Chiu F, Gelber KM, Webb CA, Weyker PD. Pain management in critically ill patients: a review of multimodal treatment options. Pain Manag. 2016 Nov;6(6):591-602. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2016-0002. Epub 2016 May 18.

    PMID: 27188977BACKGROUND
  • Kumar K, Kirksey MA, Duong S, Wu CL. A Review of Opioid-Sparing Modalities in Perioperative Pain Management: Methods to Decrease Opioid Use Postoperatively. Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1749-1760. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002497.

    PMID: 29049119BACKGROUND
  • Payen JF, Genty C, Mimoz O, Mantz J, Bosson JL, Chanques G. Prescribing nonopioids in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2013 Aug;28(4):534.e7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.10.006. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

    PMID: 23522398BACKGROUND
  • Gregori-Puigjane E, Setola V, Hert J, Crews BA, Irwin JJ, Lounkine E, Marnett L, Roth BL, Shoichet BK. Identifying mechanism-of-action targets for drugs and probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 10;109(28):11178-83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204524109. Epub 2012 Jun 18.

    PMID: 22711801BACKGROUND
  • Kim K, Kim WJ, Choi DK, Lee YK, Choi IC, Sim JY. The analgesic efficacy and safety of nefopam in patient-controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery: A randomized, double-blind, prospective study. J Int Med Res. 2014 Jun;42(3):684-92. doi: 10.1177/0300060514525351. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

    PMID: 24691459BACKGROUND
  • Moon JY, Choi SS, Lee SY, Lee MK, Kim JE, Lee JE, Lee SH. The Effect of Nefopam on Postoperative Fentanyl Consumption: A Randomized, Double-blind Study. Korean J Pain. 2016 Apr;29(2):110-8. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2016.29.2.110. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

    PMID: 27103966BACKGROUND
  • Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.

    PMID: 12421743BACKGROUND
  • Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Gordon S, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, Hart RP, Dittus R. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA. 2001 Dec 5;286(21):2703-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.21.2703.

    PMID: 11730446BACKGROUND
  • Mimoz O, Chauvet S, Gregoire N, Marchand S, Le Guern ME, Saleh A, Couet W, Debaene B, Levy RH. Nefopam pharmacokinetics in patients with end-stage renal disease. Anesth Analg. 2010 Nov;111(5):1146-53. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f33488.

    PMID: 20971961BACKGROUND
  • Du Manoir B, Aubrun F, Langlois M, Le Guern ME, Alquier C, Chauvin M, Fletcher D. Randomized prospective study of the analgesic effect of nefopam after orthopaedic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Dec;91(6):836-41. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg264.

    PMID: 14633755BACKGROUND
  • Chawla LS, Russell JA, Bagshaw SM, Shaw AD, Goldstein SL, Fink MP, Tidmarsh GF. Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock 3 (ATHOS-3): protocol for a phase III, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Crit Care Resusc. 2017 Mar;19(1):43-49.

    PMID: 28215131BACKGROUND
  • Abdelraouf MG, Farid SF, Mukhtar AM, Sabry NA. Adjuvant nefopam versus standard of care in mechanically ventilated surgical critically ill patients: A randomized, double-blind controlled study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2025 May;44(3):101518. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101518. Epub 2025 Apr 16.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

AgnosiaCritical IllnessDelirium

Interventions

NefopamStandard of CareRestraint, Physical

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesConfusionNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OxazocinesAzocinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsQuality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationBehavior ControlTherapeuticsImmobilizationInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Mohammed Gamal Abdelraouf Amer, Pharm D

    Cairo University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Reseacher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2021

First Posted

October 8, 2021

Study Start

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion

March 1, 2023

Study Completion

March 31, 2023

Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2023-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations