NCT05070780

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to apply a biomechanical system (the NeuroFlexor) associated with the EMG recording to study the physiological mechanisms that contribute to the regulation of muscle tone in healthy subjects and in patients with increased muscle tone. A second fundamental objective of this study is to monitor over time the changes in muscle tone that can be found physiologically in healthy subjects and pathologically in patients with spasticy and/or rigidity. A further objective of this study is the quantitative evaluation of the symptomatic effects of specific therapies in improving the impaired muscle tone. Clinical evaluation In this research project the investigators will recruit 20 patients with upper limb spasticity (regardless of the underlying disease responsible for the spasticity), 20 patients with Parkinson's disease characterized by stiffness of the upper limbs and 20 healthy control subjects. Patients will be recruited from the IRCCS Neuromed Institute, Pozzilli (IS). Participants will give their written informed consent to the study, which will be approved by the institutional ethics committee of the IRCCS Neuromed Institute, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants will be right-handed according to the Edinburgh handedness inventory (EDI) (Oldfield, 1971). Parkinson's disease will be diagnosed in accordance with the updated diagnostic criteria of the MDS (Postuma, RB et al. Validation of the MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 33, 1601 -1608 (2018)., Nd). Clinical signs and symptoms of parkinsonian patients will be evaluated using the Hoehn \& Yahr scale (H\&Y), UPDRS part III (Patrick et al., 2001). The diagnosis of spasticity will be made through the neurological clinical evaluation of the patients and on the basis of the specific clinical history of the various pathologies underlying the spasticity itself (e.g. multiple sclerosis, stroke, spinal injuries). Spasticity will be assessed with the Modified Ashworth Scale "(MAS) (Harb and Kishner, 2021), the Modified Tardieu scale (MTS) (Patrick and Ada, 2006). Cognitive functions and mood, in both pathological conditions, will be evaluated using the clinical Mini-Mental State Evaluation (MMSE) scale (Folstein et al., 1975) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM\_D) ( Hamilton, 1967). No participant must report pain problems and / or functional limitations affecting the upper limbs. Exclusion criteria: - insufficient degree of passive wrist movement (\<30 ° in flexion and \<40 ° in extension) - tension at rest during NeuroFlexor recordings - hand pathologies (neurological or rheumatological) - upper limb fractures in the previous six months - presence of peacemakers or other stimulators - pregnancy. All patients, and the group of healthy control subjects will have comparable anthropometric and demographic characteristics. Experimental paradigm Participants will be seated comfortably, with the shoulder at 45 ° of abduction, the elbow at 90 ° in flexion, the forearm in pronation and the dominant hand placed on the platform of the Neuroflexor device. Participants will be instructed to relax during the test session, which will consist of the passive extension of the wrist at 7 speeds, one slow (5 ° / s) and 6 rapid (50 ° / s, 100 ° / s, 150 ° / s, 200 ° / s, 236 ° / s, 280 ° / s). The total range of wrist movement will be 50 °, starting from an initial angle of 20 ° in palmar flexion up to 30 ° in extension. Before the start of the experiment, participants will do practical tests in order to become familiar with the device. Two slow and five rapid movements will be made for each speed. The different angular velocities of wrist mobilization will be randomized. Slow movements will be performed before fast movements with an interval of 10 seconds between each test. For each participant, a NC, EC and VC value in Newton will be calculated by a dedicated software. The resistance profiles will also be obtained when the device was running idle (without hand) to allow the biomechanical model to isolate the forces originating from the hand from the intrinsic forces of the device. For each movement, the corresponding surface EMG trace will have been recorded, by placing the electrodes on the skin overlying the belly of the FRC and ERC muscles. An accelerometer, fixed on the back of the hand of the limb to be examined, will be used to synchronize the electromyograph with the NeuroFlexor. The EMG activity recorded by means of surface electrodes with belly-tendon type mounting, will be amplified using the Digitimer, will then be digitized at 5 kHz using the CED, and finally it will be stored on a computer dedicated to offline analysis. EMG recordings will be made at 6 speeds, 50°/ s, 100°/ s, 150°/ s, 200 °/s, 236 °/s, 280 °/s. For each trace the following parameters will be analyzed: latency, peak-to-peak amplitude and area of the EMG response.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2021

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 27, 2021

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2021

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 7, 2021

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 22, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

September 27, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 21, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Analysis of biomechanical properties of muscles

    total force

    100 milliseconds

Study Arms (3)

Healthy Subjects

Device: Robot-assisted examination

Patients with rigidity

Device: Robot-assisted examination

Patients with spasticity

Device: Robot-assisted examination

Interventions

evaluation of muscle tone with Robot-assisted perturbation

Healthy SubjectsPatients with rigidityPatients with spasticity

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Healthy subjects, 20 Patients with rigidity, 20 Patients with spasticity, 20

You may qualify if:

  • Parkinson's disease
  • post-stroke spasticity

You may not qualify if:

  • degenerative arthrosis
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • cognitive impairment (MMSE \<24)
  • depression and other mood disorders (HAMD\> 7)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Irccs Neuromed

Pozzilli, 86077, Italy

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Muscle RigidityMuscle Spasticity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMuscle HypertoniaNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2021

First Posted

October 7, 2021

Study Start

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion

December 30, 2022

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

March 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Locations