Chinese Herbal Medicine in Acute INtracerebral Haemorrhage (CHAIN) Trial
An Investigator-initiated and Conducted Multicentre, Prospective, Randomised, Double-blinded Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Herbal Medicine in Patients With Acute Intracerebral Haemorrhage
1 other identifier
interventional
1,504
1 country
1
Brief Summary
TCM is an essential context of the ICH management in Chinese culture. Given the potential benefits of Chinese herbal medicine FYTF-919 in reducing haematoma and bleeding after acute ICH from fundamental research and small clinical studies, more reliable evidence is required to guide ICH treatment using TCM. This study aims to determine the effectiveness and safety of TCM in a larger sample of patients with moderate-severe ICH and provide evidence for TCM clinical guidelines on ICH management. The presumed mechanism of action is in promoting the reabsorption of the haematoma and perihematomal oedema in ICH.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Oct 2021
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 7, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2025
CompletedOctober 4, 2021
September 1, 2021
3.2 years
September 7, 2021
September 24, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Utility-weighted modified Rankin scale scores
Utility-weighted modified Rankin scale scores. The value range from 0 to 10: higher scores mean a better outcome.
90 days after the treatment started
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Utility-weighted mRS scores
180 days after the treatment started
7 levels of mRS
28 days, 90 days and 180 days after the treatment started
Poor prognosis rate
28 days, 90 days and 180 days after the treatment started
NIHSS score
7 days and 28 days after the treatment started
Mortality rate
28 days, 90 days and 180 days
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALChinese herbal medicine FYTF-919: Oral liquid 33ml TID (for patients who are unconscious or dysphagia, a dose of 25ml \* Q6H will be given through nasal feeding)
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo treatment: Oral liquid 33ml TID (or patients who are unconscious or dysphagia, a dose of 25ml \* Q6H will be given through nasal feeding)
Interventions
Oral liquid 33ml TID (for patients who are unconscious or dysphagia, a dose of 25ml \* Q6H will be given through nasal feeding)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years;
- Diagnosis of spontaneous ICH, confirmed by brain imaging;
- Presentation within 48 hours of symptom onset (or last seen well);
- Meet any of the following criteria: a) NIHSS ≥8, or b) GCS 7-14;
- Provide written informed consent by patient (or approved surrogate);
You may not qualify if:
- ICH secondary to a structural abnormality in the brain (e.g. cerebrovascular malformation, arterial aneurysm, tumour, Moyamoya disease, trauma, or previous ischaemic stroke), or secondary to presumed cerebrovascular amyloidosis, or secondary to reperfusion treatment for ischaemic stroke, or secondary to anticoagulant treatment, or secondary to antiplatelet treatment.
- Unlikely to potentially benefit from therapy (e.g. advanced dementia) or judged by responsible treating clinician to have a high likelihood of early death irrespective of treatment;
- Other medical illness that will interfere with outcome assessments and follow-up (e.g. known significant pre-stroke disability \[modified Rankin scale {mRS} scores 4-5\], advanced cancer and renal failure);
- Known definite contraindication to the Chinese herbal medicine;
- Women who are known to be pregnant or lactating;
- Currently participating in another trial which would interfere with outcome assessments.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Related Publications (1)
Guo J, Chen X, Wu M, Wang D, Zhao Y, Li Q, Tang G, Che F, Xia Z, Liang Z, Shi L, Jiang Q, Chen Y, Liu X, Ren X, Ouyang M, Wang B, You S, Billot L, Wang X, Liu Z, Jing H, Meng W, Tian S, Liu E, Xiang Y, Tang X, Xie T, Cui W, Zheng Y, Cao J, Zhang J, Wen Z, Huang T, Wang L, You C, Pan S, Cai Y, Lu Y, Hankey GJ, Al-Shahi Salman R, Anderson CS, Song L; CHAIN investigators. Traditional Chinese medicine FYTF-919 (Zhongfeng Xingnao oral prescription) for the treatment of acute intracerebral haemorrhage: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial. Lancet. 2024 Nov 30;404(10468):2187-2196. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02261-X. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
PMID: 39547249DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Craig Anderson, MD
The George Institute for Global Health, Australia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 7, 2021
First Posted
October 4, 2021
Study Start
October 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
January 1, 2025
Last Updated
October 4, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data sharing will be available from 12 months after the publication of the main results.
- Access Criteria
- 1. The data sharing will be only for the purposes of health and medical research and within the constraints of the consent under which the data were originally gathered. 2. The Custodian of the Collection will not consider any Proposals for data sharing that unblind, or potentially unblind, randomised comparisons in active / ongoing trials. 3. Requesters should be employees of a recognised academic institution, health service organisation, commercial research organisation or from the pharmaceutical industry. Requesters must have experience in medical research. 4. Requesters must be able to demonstrate through their peer review publications in the area of interest their ability to carry out the proposed use of the requested dataset from a Collection. 5. The Requesters must not have a conflict of interest that may potentially influence their interpretation of any analyses.
Data can be shared with bona fide researchers after the publication of the main results, based on a submitted protocol to the research office of The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Australia.