MIDAS Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Implementation Strategies to Optimize Use of Medications in VA Clinical Settings
MIDAS cRCT
Maintaining Implementation Through Dynamic Adaptations (MIDAS) (QUE 20-025)
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Scientific advances are constantly leading to better treatments. However, it is quite challenging for healthcare systems, including VA, to ask very busy providers to change the way they practice. The MIDAS QUERI program will help providers improve the way they treat VA patients for three common conditions, using specific strategies to ensure the reliable delivery of these treatments. The first project will focus on reducing potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use using the VIONE practice, developed in VA. The second project will focus on better use of drugs called direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with a history of severe blood clots or an abnormal heart rhythm. The third project will focus on increasing the use of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia as the first-line treatment for insomnia instead of sleep medications. The investigators will test two implementation approaches to improve medication use within these topics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 3, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 6, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 14, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 15, 2025
CompletedOctober 15, 2025
September 1, 2025
2.8 years
August 17, 2021
May 14, 2025
September 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the Percentage of Patients With Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use (PIMs) Between Pre- and Post-periods, Across Facilities.
Percentage of PIMs across AD vs. LEAP+AD facilities were modelled as the difference between post-period and pre-period, using the average from the 1-6-month pre-baseline period as "pre" and the average 13-18-month post-baseline as "post." Data was collected monthly at patient level and collapsed by clinic-month for patients who are at risk of potentially inappropriate medication use. Clinic-month outcome was computed as: 1) VIONE; proportion of patients who possessed one or more medications from the Beers' list of patients 65 or older, actively following with the clinic, and not in hospice/palliative care; 2) DOACs; proportion of patients with flags for potentially inappropriate use on a DOAC safety dashboard of those using DOACs; 3) CBTI; proportion of patients with a new prescription for a sleep medication for insomnia who have not had CBTI of those who are actively followed by the clinic and not in hospice/palliative care. The outcome was analyzed by pooling across all three-EBPs.
13-18 months post-baseline
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change in Patients With Percentage of Potentially Inappropriate Use of Medications (PIMs) Across Facilities
13-18 months post-baseline
Change in Monthly Medication Costs for All Drugs Across Facilities
13-18 months post-baseline
Change in Number of Medication Reviews Across Facilities
13-18 months post-baseline
Change in Number of Inappropriate Medications at a Patient-level
13-18 months post-baseline
Change in Percentage of Patients With High-risk Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) Use Across Facilities
13-18 months post-baseline
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Change in Employee Engagement in Quality Improvement
18-months Post-baseline
Change in Employee Burnout
18-months post-baseline
Change in Best Places to Work Score
18-months post-baseline
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Academic Detailing (AD) Only
ACTIVE COMPARATOROne-on-one educational outreach to employees and providers.
AD + LEAP Combined
EXPERIMENTALThis arm combines use of AD plus the Learn. Engage. Act. Process (LEAP) program. LEAP is a 6-month quality improvement coaching program plus a 6-month monthly follow-up.
Interventions
The National Resource Center for Academic Detailing (NaRCAD) describes AD as "an innovative, one-on-one outreach education technique that helps clinicians provide evidence-based care to their patients. Using an accurate, up-to-date synthesis of the best clinical evidence in an engaging format, academic detailers ignite clinician behavior change, ultimately improving patient health. A successful AD visit is highly interactive, always a dialogue, and assesses a clinician's individual needs, beliefs, attitudes, issues, and concerns in order to promote better.\[practice\]."
Learn. Engage. Act. Process (LEAP) program is a structured 6-month core curriculum plus 6 monthly collaborative sessions. The LEAP quality improvement program engages frontline teams in sustained incremental improvements of EBPs over a six-month period, allowing space for busy clinicians to learn and immediately apply fundamental QI skills. LEAP encompasses: 1) a structured, accessible curriculum based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI) Model for Improvement and Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles of change; 2) team-based, hands-on learning, and 3) coaching support and a QI network to enhance learning and accountability.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Note- the investigators are recruiting clinics - not individual patients.
- Prior to implementation, the investigators will work with sites to ensure they have met the preconditions necessary to begin sustained optimization of the EBP:
- a team leader or champion
- an identified department with service leadership buy-in and control over the processes/practices impacted by the implementation
- readily accessible data to measure process and impact of the implementation and use of the EBP
- availability of required resources
You may not qualify if:
- N/A
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105-2303, United States
Related Publications (2)
Domlyn AM, Hooks G, Freitag M, Evans L, Stewart M, Damschroder L, Sussman JB. Core and modifiable components of academic detailing: demonstration of implementation strategy development, tailoring, and documentation process. Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 3;5:1521504. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1521504. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 40529793DERIVEDDamschroder LJ, Sussman JB, Pfeiffer PN, Kurlander JE, Freitag MB, Robinson CH, Spoutz P, Christopher MLD, Battar S, Dickerson K, Sedgwick C, Wallace-Lacey AG, Barnes GD, Linsky AM, Ulmer CS, Lowery JC. Maintaining Implementation through Dynamic Adaptations (MIDAS): protocol for a cluster-randomized trial of implementation strategies to optimize and sustain use of evidence-based practices in Veteran Health Administration (VHA) patients. Implement Sci Commun. 2022 May 14;3(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00297-z.
PMID: 35568903DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This evaluation was developed by combining three smaller cluster randomized control trials on different topic areas. In the early post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era, site-level engagement was extremely difficult, perhaps minimizing the impact of the interventions.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jeremy Sussman, MD, MS, Corresponding Principal Investigator
- Organization
- VA Ann Arbor Health Care System
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeremy B. Sussman, MD MS
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ariel Domlyn, PhD
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jacob E Kurlander, MD MS MS
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul N Pfeiffer, MD MS
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2021
First Posted
October 4, 2021
Study Start
May 3, 2021
Primary Completion
March 6, 2024
Study Completion
May 14, 2024
Last Updated
October 15, 2025
Results First Posted
October 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- For 36 months after article is published.
- Access Criteria
- Upon request by researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Further details will be available.
Site-level data that underlie results reported, after de-identification will be available.