Pain Control Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block vs. Pericapsular Nerve Group Block vs. Local Anesthetic Infiltration vs. Spinal Anesthetic Without Adjuncts for Pain Control Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in elderly patients, with its main indication being end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip1. It is estimated that over 572,000 patients per year will undergo THA in the USA alone by 20301 and postsurgical pain associated with THA remains a significant issue. Postoperative pain is associated with delayed joint mobilization, ambulation, patient satisfaction and can often delay the patient's discharge home1. Multimodal analgesia for the management of postoperative pain following THA is now standard of care2,3. It involves a combination of local anesthetic infiltration (LAI), peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), analgesics such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen and/or other medications, including gabapentinoids and opioids. Using multiple analgesic modalities allows for an easier and faster recovery for THA patients and ultimately allows for reduction in postoperative narcotic use and it's associated negative side effects. Total hip arthroplasty can be performed under either general anesthesia, epidural anesthesia or most commonly under spinal anesthesia, with or without epidural morphine. The adjunctive use of LAI, pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block or suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for postoperative pain management is becoming more widespread, although evidence on their efficacy has been inconsistent4-8. As such, comparative evaluation of these adjuctive analgesic modalities is imperative to optimize postoperative pain management following THA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Nov 2021
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 4, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2024
CompletedAugust 16, 2024
August 1, 2024
2.8 years
September 20, 2021
August 15, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual analog pain scale (VAS)
The primary outcome was chosen as VAS at 4 hours post-op. The investigators debated between VAS score and narcotic consumption, as both have their limitations. VAS score, which is used as primary outcome in most similar studies1, 4-9 can be affected by narcotic consumption and vice-versa. Narcotic consumption is also variable given the need for patients to ask for the medication (with the subjective nature of pain tolerance) and requirement that nursing be available to administer it while in hospital. Some studies have attempted to circumvent these limitations by utilizing patient controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps. The researchers wanted to avoid this because it does not reflect current clinical practice. Therefore, VAS was chosen at 4 hours, a time frame where the spinal effect is likely diminished, the blocks are most effective, the need for breakthrough narcotics is low, being in line with the current literature
At 4 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient satisfaction with pain control
at 4 hours
Study Arms (4)
Suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB)
EXPERIMENTALSuprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is a technique that involves injection of local anesthetics underneath the fascia of the iliacus muscle to block the femoral nerve, the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and, possibly, the obturator nerve.
Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) is a technique that involves injection of local anesthetic in the musculofascial plane between the psoas muscle and the superior pubic ramus.
Local analgesia infiltration (LAI)
SHAM COMPARATORlocal anesthetic infiltration (LAI) into the anterior pericapsular tissues
No adjunct: spinal anaesthesia (control)
SHAM COMPARATORStandard spinal anesthesia technique
Interventions
40cc
10cc
20cc
15mg
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (≥18 years old) who require an inpatient primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia
- Written consent
- Any gender
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who require revision surgery
- Anesthesia other than spinal (general, epidural, other)
- Body mass index (BMI) \> 45 kg/m2
- Allergies to study medication
- Previous fracture to affected area
- Previous surgery to the affected hip
- Diagnosis other than osteoarthritis (avascular necrosis, significant deformity such as post-Perthes, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, dysplasia classified as Crowe 3 or 4, or other diagnoses causing significant deformity of the femoral head or acetabulum)
- THA for hip fractures
- Patients taking daily opiod analgesics pre-operatively
- Anesthetist on day of surgery who does not perform FICB and PENG and no alternate anesthetist available to perform the block
- Patients who do not understand, read or communicate in either French or English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Mary's Hospital Center
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr. Anthony Albers, MDCM, FRCSC
McGill University, Department of Surgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2021
First Posted
September 30, 2021
Study Start
November 4, 2021
Primary Completion
August 15, 2024
Study Completion
August 15, 2024
Last Updated
August 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08