da Vinci SP Robotic Gastrectomy
The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using da Vinci SP for Early Gastric Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Laparoscopic surgery revolutionized the surgical treatment of gastric cancer saving large incsion and associated pain. Robotic surgical system was introduced to enhance the minimally invasive surgery using articulating robotic arm. The da vinci SP system, which enables single-port surgery, can allow surgeon to provide radical gastrectomy with minimal scar and associated pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable gastric-cancer
Started Dec 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable gastric-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 16, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 11, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 11, 2022
CompletedJune 27, 2023
June 1, 2023
11 months
September 10, 2021
June 26, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
major complication
Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3 or more
30 days after gastrectomy
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Operation time
30 days after gastrectomy
bleeding
30 days after gastrectomy
bowel recovery
30 days after gastrectomy
Hospital stay
30 days after gastrectomy
Study Arms (1)
SP group
EXPERIMENTALpatients group underwent gastrectomy using da vinci SP
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma of stomach scheduled to undergo radical gastrectomy
- Between 20-80
- ASA score (American society of anesthesiology) class: I - III
- Signed to informed consent after through explanation about the study
You may not qualify if:
- distant metastasis
- EMR/ESD canddiate
- complicated gastric cancer (obstruction or perforation)
- Active other primary tumor
- Vulerable subject (illiterate, pregnant)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (16)
Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;11(2):69-77. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.69. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
PMID: 22076206BACKGROUNDLee JH, Kim KM, Cheong JH, Noh SH. Current management and future strategies of gastric cancer. Yonsei Med J. 2012 Mar;53(2):248-57. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.248.
PMID: 22318810BACKGROUNDKitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994 Apr;4(2):146-8.
PMID: 8180768BACKGROUNDKim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Song KY. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):417-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b.
PMID: 20160637BACKGROUNDZeng YK, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Lin HS, Cai L. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182583e2e.
PMID: 22664559BACKGROUNDKim YM, Baek SE, Lim JS, Hyung WJ. Clinical application of image-enhanced minimally invasive robotic surgery for gastric cancer: a prospective observational study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb;17(2):304-12. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2094-0. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
PMID: 23207683BACKGROUNDCruz CJ, Huynh F, Kang I, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Initial experiences of robotic SP cholecystectomy: a comparative analysis with robotic Si single-site cholecystectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Jan;100(1):1-7. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.1.1. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
PMID: 33457391BACKGROUNDKang SK, Jang WS, Kim SW, Kim SH, Han SW, Lee YS. Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP(R) system: initial experience with a pediatric patient. J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Oct;15(5):576-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
PMID: 31570233BACKGROUNDGomes MTV, Machado AMN, Podgaec S, Barison GAS. Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017 Oct-Dec;15(4):476-480. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082017AO4134.
PMID: 29364368BACKGROUNDTokunaga M, Sugisawa N, Kondo J, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Early phase II study of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(3):542-7. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0293-3. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
PMID: 24005955BACKGROUNDLee S, Kim JK, Kim YN, Jang DS, Kim YM, Son T, Hyung WJ, Kim HI. Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4002-4009. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5435-y. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
PMID: 28205030BACKGROUNDPark JY, Jo MJ, Nam BH, Kim Y, Eom BW, Yoon HM, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Lee JH. Surgical stress after robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications. Br J Surg. 2012 Nov;99(11):1554-61. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8887.
PMID: 23027072BACKGROUNDKim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Song KY, Ryu SY. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 1;32(7):627-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8551. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
PMID: 24470012BACKGROUNDTokunaga M, Kondo J, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Postoperative intra-abdominal complications assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification following open and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Oct;16(10):1854-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1981-8. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
PMID: 22847575BACKGROUNDKim SM, Ha MH, Seo JE, Kim JE, Choi MG, Sohn TS, Bae JM, Kim S, Lee JH. Comparison of Reduced Port Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (Duet TLDG) and Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;22(8):2567-72. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4333-y. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
PMID: 25564174BACKGROUNDPark SH, Kim YN, Hwang J, Kim KY, Cho M, Kim YM, Hyung WJ, Kim HI. Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial using the da Vinci Single Port(SP) robotic system. Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 30;13(1):18578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45655-6.
PMID: 37903856DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2021
First Posted
September 21, 2021
Study Start
December 16, 2021
Primary Completion
November 11, 2022
Study Completion
December 11, 2022
Last Updated
June 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share