NCT05049460

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to examine the effect of four sessions of theta burst stimulation (TBS) versus sham TMS on attentional bias for smoking and opioid cues versus neutral stimuli in a population of patients with tobacco use disorder (TUD) with comorbid opioid use disorder (OUD) that is stable and on treatment with buprenorphine. The investigators will also examine the effect of TBS on craving for cigarettes as well as opioids. Participants will perform a stress induction procedure that mirrors an optimum combination of cues that trigger tonic craving in their environment while exposed to stress. All four sessions of TBS/sham TMS will be performed on the same day, with each session lasting for approximately 10 minutes and separated by 50 minute intervals.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 8, 2021

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 15, 2021

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 20, 2021

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2024

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 22, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

October 22, 2025

Status Verified

October 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

September 8, 2021

Results QC Date

July 29, 2025

Last Update Submit

October 6, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Attentional Bias for Smoking Stimuli

    Attentional bias was measured at baseline using a visual probe task administered (adapted for smoking images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of cigarettes and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on cigarette cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.

    Baseline

  • Attentional Bias for Smoking Stimuli

    Attentional bias was measured using a visual probe task administered (adapted for smoking images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of cigarettes and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on cigarette cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.

    Immediately after intervention (sessions of TBS or sham TMS)

  • Attentional Bias for Opioid Stimuli

    Attentional bias was measured using a visual probe task administered (adapted for opioid images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of opioids and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on opioid cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.

    Baseline

  • Attentional Bias for Opioid Stimuli

    Attentional bias was measured using a visual probe task administered (adapted for opioid images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of opioids and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on opioid cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.

    Immediately after intervention (sessions of TBS or sham TMS)

  • Craving

    The Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-short form (TCQ-SF) consists of 12 items rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 84 with a higher score equating to increased craving.

    Baseline

  • Craving

    The Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-short form (TCQ-SF) consists of 12 items rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 84 with a higher score equating to increased craving.

    Immediately after intervention (sessions of TBS or sham TMS)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants Showing Functional Connectivity Changes

    Baseline and immediately after intervention (sessions of TBS or sham TMS)

Study Arms (2)

Active intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Four sessions of theta burst stimulation, amounting to 7200 pulses at 120% resting motor threshold. Targeting will be done using neuronavigation and processed resting state brain scan.

Device: Theta Burst Stimulation

Sham TMS

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Four sessions of sham TMS. Targeting will be done using neuronavigation and processed resting state brain scan.

Device: Sham TMS

Interventions

Four sessions of theta burst stimulation (TBS) at 120 % RMT and comprising 7200 pulses, given with functional targeting.

Active intervention
Sham TMSDEVICE

Four sessions of sham TMS, done using the A/P MagVenture coil, with subject's head separated from the coil by foam padding.

Sham TMS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients enrolled in the SMART Clinic at University of Kentucky
  • years of age
  • Preferably right hand dominant
  • Currently self-report smoking 10 of more cigarettes per day or a score of \> 5 on the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine
  • Willing and able to abstain from all drug use
  • Exhaled breath on day of study CO \< 10 ppm
  • Stabilized on maintenance buprenorphine if having comorbid opioid use disorder
  • Able to read and speak English
  • Able to provide informed consent to participate.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant, nursing, or becoming pregnant during the study.
  • History of traumatic brain injury or seizures which are contraindications for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
  • Increased risk of seizure for any reason, including prior diagnosis of epilepsy, seizure disorder, increased intracranial pressure, or history of significant head trauma with loss of consciousness for ≥ 5 minutes which are all contraindications for TMS.
  • Presence of intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysms clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes), cardiac pacemakers, or vagus nerve stimulation device which are all contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging.
  • Neurological disorder including, but not limited to: space occupying brain lesion; any history of seizures, history of cerebrovascular accident; fainting, cerebral aneurysm, major neurocognitive disorder, Huntington chorea; multiple sclerosis which are all contraindications for TMS.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

245 Fountain Court

Lexington, Kentucky, 40513, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Rakesh G, Alcorn JL 3rd, Khanal R, Himelhoch SS, Rush CR. Comparing cigarette-cue attentional bias between people with HIV/AIDS and people with opioid use disorder who smoke. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2023 Sep 7;11(1):2255028. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2023.2255028. eCollection 2023.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Opioid-Related DisordersTobacco Use Disorder

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Narcotic-Related DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersChemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Gopalkumar Rakesh MD
Organization
University of Kentucky, Lexington

Study Officials

  • Craig Rush, PhD

    Professor, Department of Behavioral Sciences

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2021

First Posted

September 20, 2021

Study Start

September 15, 2021

Primary Completion

July 31, 2024

Study Completion

July 31, 2024

Last Updated

October 22, 2025

Results First Posted

October 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations