Adjunctive Transcranial Stimulation to Reduce Impulsivity in Opiate Use Disorder
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to examine the effect of four sessions of theta burst stimulation (TBS) versus sham TMS on attentional bias for smoking and opioid cues versus neutral stimuli in a population of patients with tobacco use disorder (TUD) with comorbid opioid use disorder (OUD) that is stable and on treatment with buprenorphine. The investigators will also examine the effect of TBS on craving for cigarettes as well as opioids. Participants will perform a stress induction procedure that mirrors an optimum combination of cues that trigger tonic craving in their environment while exposed to stress. All four sessions of TBS/sham TMS will be performed on the same day, with each session lasting for approximately 10 minutes and separated by 50 minute intervals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 22, 2025
CompletedOctober 22, 2025
October 1, 2025
2.9 years
September 8, 2021
July 29, 2025
October 6, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Attentional Bias for Smoking Stimuli
Attentional bias was measured at baseline using a visual probe task administered (adapted for smoking images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of cigarettes and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on cigarette cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.
Baseline
Attentional Bias for Smoking Stimuli
Attentional bias was measured using a visual probe task administered (adapted for smoking images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of cigarettes and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on cigarette cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.
Immediately after intervention (sessions of TBS or sham TMS)
Attentional Bias for Opioid Stimuli
Attentional bias was measured using a visual probe task administered (adapted for opioid images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of opioids and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on opioid cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.
Baseline
Attentional Bias for Opioid Stimuli
Attentional bias was measured using a visual probe task administered (adapted for opioid images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of opioids and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on opioid cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.
Immediately after intervention (sessions of TBS or sham TMS)
Craving
The Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-short form (TCQ-SF) consists of 12 items rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 84 with a higher score equating to increased craving.
Baseline
Craving
The Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-short form (TCQ-SF) consists of 12 items rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 84 with a higher score equating to increased craving.
Immediately after intervention (sessions of TBS or sham TMS)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Showing Functional Connectivity Changes
Baseline and immediately after intervention (sessions of TBS or sham TMS)
Study Arms (2)
Active intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORFour sessions of theta burst stimulation, amounting to 7200 pulses at 120% resting motor threshold. Targeting will be done using neuronavigation and processed resting state brain scan.
Sham TMS
PLACEBO COMPARATORFour sessions of sham TMS. Targeting will be done using neuronavigation and processed resting state brain scan.
Interventions
Four sessions of theta burst stimulation (TBS) at 120 % RMT and comprising 7200 pulses, given with functional targeting.
Four sessions of sham TMS, done using the A/P MagVenture coil, with subject's head separated from the coil by foam padding.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients enrolled in the SMART Clinic at University of Kentucky
- years of age
- Preferably right hand dominant
- Currently self-report smoking 10 of more cigarettes per day or a score of \> 5 on the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine
- Willing and able to abstain from all drug use
- Exhaled breath on day of study CO \< 10 ppm
- Stabilized on maintenance buprenorphine if having comorbid opioid use disorder
- Able to read and speak English
- Able to provide informed consent to participate.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant, nursing, or becoming pregnant during the study.
- History of traumatic brain injury or seizures which are contraindications for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
- Increased risk of seizure for any reason, including prior diagnosis of epilepsy, seizure disorder, increased intracranial pressure, or history of significant head trauma with loss of consciousness for ≥ 5 minutes which are all contraindications for TMS.
- Presence of intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysms clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes), cardiac pacemakers, or vagus nerve stimulation device which are all contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging.
- Neurological disorder including, but not limited to: space occupying brain lesion; any history of seizures, history of cerebrovascular accident; fainting, cerebral aneurysm, major neurocognitive disorder, Huntington chorea; multiple sclerosis which are all contraindications for TMS.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
245 Fountain Court
Lexington, Kentucky, 40513, United States
Related Publications (1)
Rakesh G, Alcorn JL 3rd, Khanal R, Himelhoch SS, Rush CR. Comparing cigarette-cue attentional bias between people with HIV/AIDS and people with opioid use disorder who smoke. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2023 Sep 7;11(1):2255028. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2023.2255028. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37693107DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gopalkumar Rakesh MD
- Organization
- University of Kentucky, Lexington
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Craig Rush, PhD
Professor, Department of Behavioral Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2021
First Posted
September 20, 2021
Study Start
September 15, 2021
Primary Completion
July 31, 2024
Study Completion
July 31, 2024
Last Updated
October 22, 2025
Results First Posted
October 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share