SP TLF Versus Ho:YAG Laser
Comparative Effectiveness of the Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser (SP TLF) for Laser Lithotripsy of Urinary Calculi
1 other identifier
observational
62
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The investigators aim to compare the performance of the Super Pulse Thulium fiber laser (SP TFL) with that of the standard Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Ho:YAG) laser. The investigators hypothesize that the electronically-modulated laser diodes, of the TFL offers the most comprehensive and flexible range of laser parameters among laser lithotripters leading to more efficient (4 times more) and effective stone dusting resulting in production of finer dust particles obviating the need for postoperative ureteric stenting which remains a major source of patient discomfort.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started May 2021
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 10, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2024
CompletedMarch 24, 2025
March 1, 2025
2.6 years
September 8, 2021
March 19, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To determine the efficiency of SP TFL in dusting stones
We plan to assess the direct impact of SP TFL to efficiently dust 10-30mm stones in the upper urinary tract . Metrics include time needed to ablate the stone i.e. ablation speed (stone volume mm3/sec)
6 months
Mean ablation energy needed to ablate stone volume
We plan to assess the direct impact of SP TFL to effectively dust 10-30mm stones in the upper urinary tract . Metrics include ablation energy needed to ablate the stone volume (Stone volume mm3/Joules)
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of stones cleared.
9 months
Number of participants reporting complications.
9 months
Study Arms (2)
Super Pulse Thulium fiber Laser
Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet Laser
Interventions
Laser lithotripsy of urinary calculi using the Super Pulse Thulium fiber laser (SP TLF)
Laser lithotripsy of urinary calculi using the standard Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Ho:YAG) laser.
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects eligible for this study will be identified via eRecord in the Urology Department (routine access) of patients who were diagnosed with upper urinary tract calculi who underwent surgery utilizing either high powered Ho:YAG or TL-SPL lasers.
You may qualify if:
- Patient is scheduled to undergo mini-PCNL and/or RIRS surgery at the University of Rochester Medical Center for the management of upper urinary tract calculi (i.e. kidney and proximal ureter)
- Stones located in the kidney and proximal ureter
- Stones measuring 10-30mm
- Ability to give informed consent
- Any racial or ethnic origin
- Age 18 years and older
You may not qualify if:
- Active kidney infection
- Patients with prior stenting
- Pregnant patients
- Patients with solitary kidney
- Patients with ureteral tumor or stricture
- Inability to give informed consent
- Not age 18 and older
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed Ghazi, MD
Associate Professor
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2021
First Posted
September 17, 2021
Study Start
May 10, 2021
Primary Completion
January 1, 2024
Study Completion
January 1, 2024
Last Updated
March 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No IPD will be shared with other researchers.