Registry of Thiola EC Therapy
Open Label Prospective Observational Registry of Thiola EC Therapy
1 other identifier
observational
25
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Thiola EC represents several modifications of Thiola that promise better, more efficacious therapy of cystinuria. First, pill size has changed from 100 mg to 300 mg, meaning that typical pill burden will be reduced from, on average, 10 pills per day to 3-5 pills per day. This change will be welcomed by patients whose fluid intake and administration of potassium citrate are daily impositions. Second, the preparation is now enteric-coated, formulated to offer delayed release of active tiopronin. Lastly, Thiola EC can be taken with food which is an improvement to the inconvenient dosing regimen of Thiola, which can only be taken one hour before, or two hours after meals. These changes may affect compliance and side effect profiles compared to those of Thiola. In combination with potassium citrate or other alkali preparations, adverse GI effects are relatively common in actively-treated patients with cystinuria. It is possible that GI side effects may be reduced by Thiola EC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Mar 2021
Typical duration for all trials
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2023
CompletedFebruary 29, 2024
February 1, 2024
2.7 years
September 13, 2021
February 28, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Wisconsin Stone Quality Of Life (WiSQoL) Score
The WiSQoL questionnaire is designed to understand the quality of life of patients with a history of kidney stones. There are 7 main questions that each have sub-questions. The questions are answered on a scale from 1 (very true / always or almost always) to 5 (not at all true / not at all, never). The total range of questions is 28-140; the lower the score, the worse the quality of life.
Baseline
Wisconsin Stone Quality Of Life (WiSQoL) Score
The WiSQoL questionnaire is designed to understand the quality of life of patients with a history of kidney stones. There are 7 main questions that each have sub-questions. The questions are answered on a scale from 1 (very true / always or almost always) to 5 (not at all true / not at all, never). The total range of questions is 28-140; the lower the score, the worse the quality of life.
Month 6
Wisconsin Stone Quality Of Life (WiSQoL) Score
The WiSQoL questionnaire is designed to understand the quality of life of patients with a history of kidney stones. There are 7 main questions that each have sub-questions. The questions are answered on a scale from 1 (very true / always or almost always) to 5 (not at all true / not at all, never). The total range of questions is 28-140; the lower the score, the worse the quality of life.
Month 12
Wisconsin Stone Quality Of Life (WiSQoL) Score
The WiSQoL questionnaire is designed to understand the quality of life of patients with a history of kidney stones. There are 7 main questions that each have sub-questions. The questions are answered on a scale from 1 (very true / always or almost always) to 5 (not at all true / not at all, never). The total range of questions is 28-140; the lower the score, the worse the quality of life.
Month 18
Wisconsin Stone Quality Of Life (WiSQoL) Score
The WiSQoL questionnaire is designed to understand the quality of life of patients with a history of kidney stones. There are 7 main questions that each have sub-questions. The questions are answered on a scale from 1 (very true / always or almost always) to 5 (not at all true / not at all, never). The total range of questions is 28-140; the lower the score, the worse the quality of life.
Month 24
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36v2) Score
Scales are standardized with a scoring algorithm or by the SF-36v2 scoring software to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status.
Baseline
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36v2) Score
Scales are standardized with a scoring algorithm or by the SF-36v2 scoring software to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status.
Month 6
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36v2) Score
Scales are standardized with a scoring algorithm or by the SF-36v2 scoring software to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status.
Month 12
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36v2) Score
Scales are standardized with a scoring algorithm or by the SF-36v2 scoring software to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status.
Month 18
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36v2) Score
Scales are standardized with a scoring algorithm or by the SF-36v2 scoring software to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status.
Month 24
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with cystinuria on Thiola EC.
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- Patients with cystinuria and a history of kidney stones
- Taking Thiola EC
- Willing and able to provide consent
You may not qualify if:
- \. Unable to sign informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
NYU Langone Health
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27708, United States
University of Texas Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Goldfarb, MD
NYU Langone Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2021
First Posted
September 17, 2021
Study Start
March 2, 2021
Primary Completion
October 31, 2023
Study Completion
October 31, 2023
Last Updated
February 29, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
- Access Criteria
- The investigator who proposed to use the data, researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, and investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee ("learned intermediary") identified for this purpose will have access to the data upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to david.goldfarb@nyulangone.org. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be shared upon reasonable request.