NCT05046210

Brief Summary

In the present study, the investigators aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of community-based oral exercise with LHA intervention on the oral health-related quality of life, oral function and oral self-care behaviors. This randomized controlled trial included LHA group (EG) and leaflet group (CG), respectively. The EG received a four-week one-on-one session by an LHA. Baseline and follow-up data collection were used to collect the data in oral Self-care behaviors, oral hygiene, oral function and quality of life.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
240

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 10, 2019

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 29, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 3, 2021

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 27, 2021

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 16, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

September 16, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

August 27, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 7, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

AboriginalLay Health AdvisorOral HygieneQuality of LifeOral Function

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (13)

  • Oral health-related quality of life

    OHRQoL was measured using the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) , which was translated into Chinese for the participants (GOHAI-T). For example, "Are you satisfied or happy with the appearance of your teeth, gums or dentures?" Possible responses were range from 1 (always) to 5 (never). The total score ranged from 12 to 60 points. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. Cronbach's alpha was 0.75 for the scale.

    Change from baseline at 3-month and 6-month after intervention

  • Swallowing

    The Repetitive Saliva-Swallowing Test (RSST) was used to evaluate swallowing. Participants were asked to swallow saliva as many times as possible in 30 seconds.

    Change from baseline at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month after intervention

  • syllable /pa/, /ta/ and /ka/

    For oral diadochokinesis (DDK), the participants were asked to repeat the /pa/, /ta/, and /ka/ syllables as quickly as possible, and the number of articulations was counted. Using a digital counter, we separately counted the number of articulations of the /pa/, /ta/, and /ka/ syllables within 10 seconds.

    Change from baseline at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month after intervention

  • Masticatory performance

    Masticatory performance was evaluated using the color-changeable chewing gum (Xylitol, 3.0 g Lotte, Saitama, Japan). This chewing gum contains xylitol, citric acid, and red, yellow, and blue dyes that change color when subjected to masticatory forces from chewing. The red dye is pH sensitive and changes color under neutral or alkaline conditions. Citric acid maintains a low internal pH of the yellowish-green gum before chewing commences. The gum changes to red when chewed because the yellow and blue dyes seep into saliva, and citric acid elution produces the red color. Participants were asked to chew for 2 minutes. Two minutes later, the observer checked the color of the gum by using a color chart of five color gradations ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good).

    Change from baseline at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month after intervention

  • Saliva flow rate

    Saliva flow rate was measured the saliva flow rate in one minute (ml/min). Participants were asked to chew the gauze for two minutes and spited out the gauze and saliva back into the test tube. After centrifuging the saliva of the gauze, pour the saliva into a measuring tube to measure the volume of the saliva.

    Change from baseline at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month after intervention

  • Perceived dysphagia

    Perceived dysphagia, which was defined as a subjective perception of problems swallowing, was measured using the swallowing screening scale developed by Ohkuma and has an internal consistency Cronbachα's alpha coefficient of 0.85. Examples of questions included "Do you ever have difficulty swallowing?" "Do you ever have difficulty as a result of cough up phlegm during or after a meal?" "Does it take you longer to eat a meal than it used to?" "Do you feel that it is becoming difficult to eat solid foods?" and "Do you ever have difficulty sleeping because of coughing during the night?" Possible responses were "obviously" (frequently), "slightly" (sometimes), or "no" (never). Respondents with at least one severe symptom were classified as having dysphagia.

    Change from baseline at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month after intervention

  • Plaque control record (PCR)

    Plaque control record (PCR) was measured the percentage of tooth surface with plaque. PCR range from 0 to 100%.

    Change from baseline at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month after intervention

  • Plaque index (PI)

    Plaque index (PI) was measured the six indicator teeth 12, 16, 24, 32, 36, 44 and the score for each tooth is range from 0 to 3 (0 = no plaque, 1 = a film of plaque adhering to the free gingival margin and adjacent area of the tooth, 2 = moderate accumulation of soft deposit s within the gingival pocket, or the tooth and gingival margin which can be seen with the naked eye, 3 = abundance of soft matter within the gingival pocket and/or on the tooth and gingival margin). Then summing the average of 6 indicators teeth.

    Change from baseline at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month after intervention

  • Winkel tongue coating index (WTCI)

    Winkel tongue coating index (WTCI) was measured the accumulation of coating on the surface of the tongue. The tongue was divided into six areas (three posterior and three anterior), and the coating was scored as 0 = no coating, 1 = light coating, or 2 = severe coating; scores ranged from 0 to 12 points.

    Change from baseline at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month after intervention

  • Regular dental visit

    The question of dental visit, "Do you see a dentist every six months?" Possible responses were "Yes", "No".

    Change from baseline at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month after intervention

  • Brushing ≥2 times/day

    The question of tooth-brushing, "How many times do you brush your teeth a day?" Possible responses were "None", "One time", "Two times" and "More than 3 times".

    Change from baseline at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month after intervention

  • Use of interdental brushes

    The question of interdental brush, "Do you use an interdental brush every day?" Possible responses were "Yes", "No" and "Never heard".

    Change from baseline at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month after intervention

  • Use of dental floss

    The question of flossing, "Do you use dental floss every day?" Possible responses were "Yes", "No" and "Never heard".

    Change from baseline at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month after intervention

Study Arms (2)

LHA group (EG)

EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral: LHA intervention Oral exercise intervention is designed to increase the range of movement in tongue, lips, and jaw as well as salivary gland massages, which will help speech and/or swallow functioning. All participants performed oral exercise before three meals a day, whereas the participants in the EG also received 4 lessons from a LHA over 4 weeks.

Behavioral: LHA interventionBehavioral: Oral exercise intervention

Leaflet group (CG)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Oral exercise intervention is designed to increase the range of movement in tongue, lips, and jaw as well as salivary gland massages, which will help speech and/or swallow functioning. All participants performed oral exercise before three meals a day. The participants in the CG received oral exercise intervention and leaflets only.

Behavioral: Oral exercise intervention

Interventions

The participants in the EG received 4 lessons from a LHA over 4 weeks. Four lessons were taught one-on-one once a week by a certified LHA at the participants' homes. The lessons including understand oral structure, learn oral self-care skills and oral function promotion, understand the status of oral self-care and the relationship between oral diseases and systemic diseases, understand swallowing dysfunction and safe eating skills and review.

LHA group (EG)

Oral exercise intervention is designed to increase the range of movement in tongue, lips, and jaw as well as salivary gland massages, which will help speech and/or swallow functioning. All participants performed oral exercise before three meals a day.

LHA group (EG)Leaflet group (CG)

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 82 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years old or above and indigenous people

You may not qualify if:

  • Disability, have had oral cancer, impaired facial appearance and impaired cognitive function were excluded.
  • Impaired cognitive function was screening by Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kaohsiung Medical University

Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Location

Study Officials

  • Hsiao-Ling Huang

    Kaohsiung Medical University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants from the identified communities were randomly assigned to experimental group or control group using random table.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted. The participants recruited from aboriginal communities in Eastern Taiwan. Data collecting time was from 2019 to 2020. Participants from the identified communities were randomly assigned to experimental group or control group using random table.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2021

First Posted

September 16, 2021

Study Start

September 10, 2019

Primary Completion

July 29, 2020

Study Completion

February 3, 2021

Last Updated

September 16, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations