Comparison Dry Foot Skin Between Diabetic and Non-diabetic Subjects and the Effects of Two Cosmetic Foot Care Products
Comparing Dry to Very Dry and Cracked Foot Skin Between Diabetic and Non-diabetic Subjects and the Effects of Two Cosmetic leave-on Foot Products: an Exploratory Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The overall aims of this study are to compare the structure and function of dry to very dry and cracked foot skin between diabetic and nondiabetic subjects and to evaluate the effects of two cosmetic leave-on products on dry and fissured diabetic foot skin. Specific issues are: Are there any differences between the morphological and functional characteristics of dry to very dry and cracked skin foot between diabetic and nondiabetic subjects? What are the effects of a 4-week once daily application of an intensive care foot ointment (urea 10% foot ointment) or foot lotion (10% Urea foot lotion) on the skin barrier and on clinical signs of dryness and fissures?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2021
CompletedSeptember 16, 2021
February 1, 2017
6 months
July 29, 2020
September 13, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from Baseline in Overall Dry Skin Score
Clinical assessment of the presence or severity of skin dryness using a 7 point scale at the sole of the foot (randomized). A score of '0' indicated normal skin/no sign of dryness, whereas a score of '6' indicates large-scale plates, deep erythematous fissures and cracks
Baseline; Day 28±2
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Skin barrier
Day 0, Day 14±1,Day 28±2
Other Outcomes (8)
Stratum corneum hydration
Day 28
Skin surface pH
Day 0 , Day 14, Day 28
Epidermal thickness
D28
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
non diabetic
NO INTERVENTIONControl Group of 20 non-diabetics. Skin measurements, evaluation of skin dryness and sampling of skin particles will be performed
moderate dryness-diabetic
EXPERIMENTALExperimental: Diabetics with moderate dryness. Intervention Group of 20 diabetics with moderate dryness 10% Urea foot lotion During the course of the study participants cleanse one foot (previously randomized) once daily using the mild cleanser "Cetaphil® Restoraderm Body Wash" and apply the product "Excipial® U10 Lipolotion 10% Urea" once daily in the evening by themselves.
severe dryness- diabetic
EXPERIMENTALIntervention Group of 20 diabetics with severe dryness 10% Urea foot ointment During the course of the study participants cleanse their feet once daily using the mild cleanser "Cetaphil® Restoraderm Body Wash" and apply the product "Excipial® Fuss Salbe 10% Urea" on both feet once daily in the evening by themselves.
Interventions
During the course of the study participants cleanse one foot (previously randomized) once daily using the mild cleanser "Cetaphil® Restoraderm Body Wash" and apply the product "Excipial® U10 Lipolotion 10% Urea" once daily in the evening by themselves.
During the course of the study participants cleanse one foot (previously randomized) once daily using the mild cleanser "Cetaphil® Restoraderm Body Wash" and apply the product "Excipial® U10 ointment10% Urea" once daily in the evening by themselves.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- diabetics and non-diabetics
- Any kind of adverse foot condition except xerosis like nail injury, ulceration, (suspected) infection including fungal infection
- History of adverse foot condition except xerosis and tinea pedis, like nail injury, ulceration, pain
- Mild xerosis cutis of feet (categories 1 and 2 according to Rogers et al. 1989)
- Severe xerosis cutis of feet (category 6 according to Rogers et al. 1989)
- Gait problems
- Other non-controlled chronic and/or acute skin disease except xerosis (e.g. atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, tinea pedis)
- Unstable chronic systemic disease (e.g. hypertension, renal insufficiency)
- Acute systemic disease (e.g. infection)
- Body temperature \> 38°C
- Pain anywhere
- Wear of compression stockings at any time
- Use of topical steroids
- Use of skin care leave-on products on the feet in the previous 2 weeks
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to product ingredients
- +11 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Galderma R&Dlead
Study Sites (1)
Charité Universitatsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ulrike Blume -Peytavi, Prof Dr.med
Charité Universitatsmedizin Berlin
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ulrike Blume-Peytavi, Prof Dr.med
Charité Universitatsmedizin Berlin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2020
First Posted
September 16, 2021
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share