Diagnosis of Respiratory Viruses in Children With Rhinoswab Junior
1 other identifier
interventional
339
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A study to investigate Rhinoswab as an alternative method to combined throat and deep nasal (CTDN) swab for respiratory sample collection in children who present to the Royal Children's Hospital (RCH) for viral testing. Children and their parent/guardian will answer a short survey about their preferences. Laboratory staff will answer a short survey about handling the different samples.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 26, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 26, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 28, 2022
CompletedFebruary 8, 2023
February 1, 2023
5 months
August 26, 2021
February 6, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Sensitivity of Rhinoswab compared with CTDN for 13 viruses on standard respiratory panel (Clinician collected/supervised)
The results (detected/not detected) on all 13 viruses on the standard respiratory panel from both the Rhinoswab and the standard swabs will be obtained, and the sensitivity of the Rhinoswab compared to the CTDN determined. Sensitivity is calculated only in the participants who tested positive for the respective virus using the CTDN swab and is calculated as the proportion patients who tested positive on the Rhinoswab among those who tested positive on the CTDN swab. 95% confidence intervals will be calculated.
5 minutes from administering test
Specificity of Rhinoswab compared with CTDN for 13 viruses on standard respiratory panel (Clinician collected/supervised)
The results (detected/not detected) on all 13 viruses on the standard respiratory panel from both the Rhinoswab and the standard swabs will be obtained, and the specificity of the Rhinoswab compared to the CTDN determined. Specificity is calculated only in participants who tested negative for respiratory viruses and is calculated as the proportion patients who tested negative on Rhinoswab among those who tested negative on CTDN swab. 95% confidence intervals will be calculated.
5 minutes from administering test
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Ct-Value of respiratory viruses on Rhinoswab compared with Ct-value of respiratory viruses on CTDN (Clinician-Collected/Supervised)
5 minutes from administering test
Swab Preference Assessment (Clinician-Collected/Supervised )
5 minutes from administering test
Median Ct-value of SARS-CoV-2 on Rhinoswab vs saliva vs CTDN (Self-collected)
5 minutes from administering test
Sensitivity of Rhinoswab compared with CTDN for SARS-CoV-2 (Self-collected)
5 minutes from administering test
Specificity of Rhinoswab compared with CTDN for SARS-CoV-2 (Self-collected)
5 minutes from administering test
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Arm 1 - Clinician Collected/supervised Rhinoswab first, then CTDN swab
EXPERIMENTALRhinoswab test administered and immediately followed by CTDN. Rhinoswab swab tested on respiratory panel vs CTDN swab tested on respiratory panel (standard of care).
Arm 2 - Clinician Collected/supervised CTDN swab first, then Rhinoswab
EXPERIMENTALCTDN test administered and immediately followed by Rhinoswab. CTDN swab tested on respiratory panel (standard of care) vs Rhinoswab swab tested on respiratory panel.
Arm 3 - Self-collected Rhinoswab, saliva swab, CTDN
EXPERIMENTALIn children 5-18 years, the child/parent/guardian collects the three samples, in order of patient/parent preference. All samples will be tested on the SARS-CoV-2 laboratory panel (Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay - Seegene Inc)
Arm 4 - Self-collected RAT, saliva, CTDN
EXPERIMENTALIn children 1 month -5 years, the child/parent/guardian collects the three samples, in order of patient/parent preference. Saliva and CTDN samples will be tested on the SARS-CoV-2 laboratory panel (Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay - Seegene Inc), RAT test kit will be Abbott PanBio
Interventions
Rhinoswab Junior is a single use self-administered nasal swab intended to collect clinical specimens from the patient's nasal passages
Combined nose and throat swab (standard of care)
Saliva swab
COVID-19 antigen self-test kit for the screening of active COVID-19 infection. It is a single-use, in vitro, visually read rapid immunoassay that uses a human nasal swab specimen for the qualitative detection of nucleocapsid protein SARS-CoV-2 antigen. It is intended to be used manually by untrained lay users (self testing) in a private setting.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic and requiring a COVID-19 test at RCH or confirmed/suspected COVID-19 at home.
- Aged between 1 month -18 years old.
- Parent/guardian present.
- Parents/self are able to provide consent.
You may not qualify if:
- \< 1 month or \>18 years old.
- Recent head or neck surgery
- Inability (e.g. non-English speaking and if no interpreter is available) or unwillingness to consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institutelead
- Rhinomed Pty Ltdcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Shidan Tosif
Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
Related Publications (2)
Tosif S, Lee LY, Nguyen J, Overmars I, Selman C, Grobler AC, McMinn A, Waller G, McNab S, Jarvis T, Steer A, Babl FE, Daley A, Crawford NW. A novel anterior nasal swab to detect respiratory viruses: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. BMC Pediatr. 2023 Apr 28;23(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-03976-5.
PMID: 37106344DERIVEDTosif S, Lee LY, Nguyen J, McMinn A, Selman C, Grobler AC, Daley A, Crawford NW. Stick with the nose...Saliva rapid antigen testing is not a viable method for testing children under 5 years old. J Paediatr Child Health. 2023 Feb;59(2):258-263. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16277. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
PMID: 36401338DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2021
First Posted
September 14, 2021
Study Start
August 26, 2021
Primary Completion
January 26, 2022
Study Completion
August 28, 2022
Last Updated
February 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Beginning 12 months following analysis and article publication
Beginning 12 months following analysis and article publication, the following will be made available long-term for use by future researchers from a recognised research institution whose proposed use of the data has been ethically reviewed and approved by an independent committee and who accept MCRI's conditions for access: • Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article after de-identification (text, tables, figures and appendices).