NCT05042726

Brief Summary

This study aims to observe the effect and safety of cerebellar continuous θ burst stimulation (cTBS) for drug-refractory epilepsy(DRE), in order to provide a new treatment for DRE and improve the quality of life of those patients. A total of 44 patients with DRE will have cTBS via accurate navigation to bilateral cerebellar dentate nuclei. Patients will be randomised into 2 groups in a crossover trial design to have 2 week periods of cTBS separated by 8 week washout periods, following which the patient will cross over to have the opposite condition for a further 2 week. Frequency and symptoms of seizures, scalp EEG, clinical scores, and QOLIE-31 were assessed at baseline and after 1 and 2 month of treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 2, 2021

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 31, 2021

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 13, 2021

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 24, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 26, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

January 5, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

August 31, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 3, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Drug Refractory EpilepsyContinuous θ Burst StimulationCerebellar Dentate Nucleus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • seizure reduction rate in pre- and post-treatment

    A 28-day baseline for seizure frequency will be recorded by the patients themselves or their relatives before therapy and then compare to the frequency at 4-week and 8-week after treatment, finally, the rate of reduction in seizure frequency was obtained

    8 weeks

  • responder rate

    proportion of people with a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency following the treatment period

    8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • QOLIE-31 scale scores

    8 weeks

  • scalp electroencephalogram

    8 weeks

  • IQ

    8 weeks

  • MQ

    8 weeks

  • MoCA

    8 weeks

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

cTBS First

EXPERIMENTAL

The first stage, participants received cTBS treatment for a total of 10 times during two weeks, then followed up for eight weeks; the second stage, participants are treated with pseudo-stimulation for a total of 10 times during two weeks, then followed up for 8 weeks similarly.

Device: cTBS First

Pseudo-stimulation First

EXPERIMENTAL

The first stage, participants received pseudo-stimulation treatment for a total of 10 times during two weeks, then followed up for eight weeks; the second stage, participants are treated with cTBS for a total of 10 times during two weeks, then followed up for 8 weeks similarly.

Device: Pseudo-stimulation First

Interventions

Continuous θ-burst stimulation (cTBS) is characterized by plexus stimulation. The stimulation intensity was 80% resting motor threshold (RMT) at 50Hz of intra plexus pulse while the frequency of inter plexus pulse is 5Hz, the duration was 33.2s, and the number of stimulation pulses was 600. Two groups of stimulation were repeated in each cerebellar dentate nucleus with an interval of 5 min in each group.

cTBS First

The transcranial magnetic stimulator operating system has a built-in control group option, in which the stimulation parameters are set consistent with the research group, which can realize the operation of only sound without stimulation.

Pseudo-stimulation First

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • a) Participants who are in line with the diagnostic criteria for epilepsy,
  • b) Participants who are diagnosed as drug-refractory epilepsy,
  • c) Participants who has duration of epilepsy ≥2 years and seizure frequency ≥2 times per month,
  • d) The type and dosage of anti-epileptic drugs do not change during the experiment,
  • e) Participants or their families reject invasive therapy, such as operation,
  • f) Participants and their families are aware of this study and sign informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • a) Participants who are in status epilepticus,
  • b) Participants who are complicated with serious infection, cerebrovascular disease, malignant tumor and other nervous system diseases, with serious dysfunction of heart, liver, kidney and other organs, and with psychiatric disorders,
  • c) Participants who are diagnosed as syncope, hysteria or other non-epileptic attacks,
  • d) Participants who are in pregnancy or lactating,
  • e) Participants who have incomplete clinical data,
  • f) Patients have contraindications of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Xijing Hospital

Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Theodore WH, Spencer SS, Wiebe S, Langfitt JT, Ali A, Shafer PO, Berg AT, Vickrey BG. Epilepsy in North America: a report prepared under the auspices of the global campaign against epilepsy, the International Bureau for Epilepsy, the International League Against Epilepsy, and the World Health Organization. Epilepsia. 2006 Oct;47(10):1700-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00633.x.

    PMID: 17054693BACKGROUND
  • Forsgren L, Beghi E, Oun A, Sillanpaa M. The epidemiology of epilepsy in Europe - a systematic review. Eur J Neurol. 2005 Apr;12(4):245-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00992.x.

    PMID: 15804240BACKGROUND
  • Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 3;342(5):314-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200002033420503.

    PMID: 10660394BACKGROUND
  • George MS, Aston-Jones G. Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):301-16. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.87.

    PMID: 19693003BACKGROUND
  • Hsu WY, Cheng CH, Lin MW, Shih YH, Liao KK, Lin YY. Antiepileptic effects of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: A meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res. 2011 Oct;96(3):231-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

    PMID: 21715144BACKGROUND
  • Cooper YA, Pianka ST, Alotaibi NM, Babayan D, Salavati B, Weil AG, Ibrahim GM, Wang AC, Fallah A. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of real-world evidence. Epilepsia Open. 2017 Dec 27;3(1):55-65. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12092. eCollection 2018 Mar.

    PMID: 29588988BACKGROUND
  • Chung SW, Hill AT, Rogasch NC, Hoy KE, Fitzgerald PB. Use of theta-burst stimulation in changing excitability of motor cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Apr;63:43-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

    PMID: 26850210BACKGROUND
  • Koc G, Gokcil Z, Bek S, Kasikci T, Eroglu E, Odabasi Z. Effects of continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Dec;77:26-29. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

    PMID: 29073474BACKGROUND
  • Brighina F, Daniele O, Piazza A, Giglia G, Fierro B. Hemispheric cerebellar rTMS to treat drug-resistant epilepsy: case reports. Neurosci Lett. 2006 Apr 24;397(3):229-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.12.050. Epub 2006 Jan 19.

    PMID: 16426754BACKGROUND
  • Krook-Magnuson E, Szabo GG, Armstrong C, Oijala M, Soltesz I. Cerebellar Directed Optogenetic Intervention Inhibits Spontaneous Hippocampal Seizures in a Mouse Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. eNeuro. 2014 Dec;1(1):ENEURO.0005-14.2014. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0005-14.2014.

    PMID: 25599088BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Drug Resistant Epilepsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EpilepsyBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2021

First Posted

September 13, 2021

Study Start

August 2, 2021

Primary Completion

August 24, 2022

Study Completion

August 26, 2022

Last Updated

January 5, 2023

Record last verified: 2022-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations